Reading comp PrepTest 145 · Section 1 · Question 26
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- A theory is outlined, ridiculed, and potentially redeemed
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Lamarck - Pre-Darwin, said animals adapt to environment and pass on
- Biologists - That's ridiculous
- Steele - Lamarckism happens in the immune system
- Paragraph note
- A question is posed and answered
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Question - How does the immune system adapt to so many and new diseases?
- Answer - One type of cell's RNA mutates a lot and gets tested against new diseases until one works
- Paragraph note
- Process/Question - How can this RNA then become DNA and get passed on?
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Process - Reverse transcription - RNA alters DNA to have disease fighting ability
- Question - How does this get passed on?
- Answer (Steele) - Viruses carry DNA to reproductive cells to pass on (theoretical, but based on known processes)
- Paragraph note
- A question is asked, evidence is presented, and a disagreement is noted
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Question - Does Steele's process actually happen?
- Author - Can "never" observe directly; must use circumstantial evidence
- Steele - Yes, and we have evidence in genes
- Other biologists - Probably not, there are less radical explanations
While biologists remain skeptical, Steele and others have proposed a Lamarckian means by which learned immunity could be passed down to the next generation.
Key Lines:
Lines 12-16 - The hypothesis to be explored is introduced
Lines 17-21 - Questions are presented (relevant to Steele's hypothesis)
Lines 24-29 - An answer is presented
Lines 34-38 - Another question is asked (directly related to Steele's hypothesis)
Lines 41-43 - Steele's answers presented
Lines 44-45 - Another question is asked (about Steele's hypothesis)
Lines 48-51 - Steele's answer/evidence is noted
Lines 55-58 - Skepticism towards Steele is noted
Meta-Structure:
Question/Answer - This passage has a Question/Answer structure, but it's a little different than other passages with that structure. Instead of having a central question that the passage attempts to answer, this one walks through a series of questions, each which has at least one answer presented to it. As such, we can't rely on the questions and answers to define the main point—we need to infer that main point by bringing all the questions together.
Old Theory/New Theory - Much like this passage doesn't have a traditional Question/Answer structure, it doesn't have a traditional Old Theory/New Theory structure. Normally, there would be an old theory that's being supplanted by a new one, and the Author's thoughts on the new theory define the main point. Here, there's an old theory (Lamarckism) that's replaced by a new one (Darwinism), but then some scientists try to revive the old theory (at least with respect to a certain area—immune systems), but there's still a debate over it.
Last Thoughts:
This is a tough passage in that it brings up genes, DNA, and RNA. But remember—you don't need to know any science for the LSAT! Any science they want you to know, they've written into the passage. So focus on the Question/Answer structure, and the viewpoints, and you'll be fine!
Also, note that the Author doesn't take sides in this debate! She presents Steele's view/evidence, and she presents the skeptical biologists who aren't swayed by Steele's argument, but she never gives any indication as to which side she thinks is more persuasive.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AScientists have succeeded in Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Question Type:
Strengthen
Strategy Overview:
Review Steele's argument and identify information/evidence that would back up his claims
Answer Anticipation/Relevant Lines:
Much like Strengthen questions in LR, we should identify the conclusion and premises, then try to strengthen their connection.
Let's start with Steele's conclusion—Adapted elements of the immune system can be passed down to later generations—thus validating Lamarckian evolution (Lines 12-16).
What's this based on? Well, Steele "hypothesizes" that altered RNA is reverse transcribed into DNA (Lines 30-33), but he's never seen that himself. He believes that this occurs via a virus carrying altered DNA to reproductive cells (Lines 41-43), but that's "speculative" (Line 39). And he has discovered a distinct pattern of mutations in genes that control the immune system that he believes indicates they were inherited (Lines 49-55), but other biologists believe there is a "less radical explanation" (Lines 55-56).
In short, each piece of evidence that Steele cites is qualified in some way—either because he hasn't witnessed it directly or because there are other explanations for it. So let's find an answer that establishes one of these things that he hasn't directly witnessed can happen, or that rules out an alternative explanation for the pattern.
Answer Explanation:
(Lines 41-43) Steele puts forward a theory as to how altered DNA in the immune system could end up in reproductive cells and thus be able to be passed down. The Author asks "does it ever actually occur?" Well, according to this answer, it does—it's happened in lab experiments with mice. While this answer doesn't prove that it happens in humans with their immune adaptations, it does establish that the process Steele puts forward is possible, thus strengthening the argument that it happens a bit. That's enough to make this answer correct.
Key Takeaway:
Much like in LR, examples of something happening strengthen that it could happen in a related context. Here, the mice reproductive cells being altered with DNA from viruses suggested that the same might happen to pass on acquired immunity in humans. -
BThe patterns of mutations Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 48-55) Steele's argument is that the patterns suggest the information is carried in the reproductive cells, not brain cells. If anything, finding the pattern in other parts of the body might suggest that this pattern has nothing to do with adapted features of the immune system and is just a part of the human genome! -
CThe process by which Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 27-29) When discussing the function of the immune system, the Author suggests that this is the case for at least some immune cells. However, that argument wasn't a unique part of Steele's theory—it appears to be an accepted fact of immunology. -
DFossil remains show that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer doesn't establish that the evolution towards having a long neck was done by individuals adapting and then passing that trait on. As such, it's compatible with Lamarck's and Darwin's theories, and so it doesn't support either of them—let alone Steele's limited revival of Lamarck's theory! -
EIt is known that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 41-43) This is a very tempting answer, showing an example of a species passing on acquired immunities to the next generation. However, it notes an alternative means of doing so—not DNA, but rather via the yolk sacs. Since the mechanism is different here than in Steele's theory, this answer actually weakens it, suggesting there might be another mechanism at play in humans.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Help with E and A 1 reply
Started by fable
-
Question 26 A VS E 4 replies
Started by nikkim
-
A vs E 1 reply
Started by Kathleen