Reading comp PrepTest 142 · Section 3 · Question 4
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- A question/conundrum is presented and explored
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Art experts spend a lot of time on paintings/music/etc, but not on perfume - a mistake
- Similarity - They all stimulate senses
- Paragraph note
- Similarities between painting and perfume are discussed - focus on painting
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Similarity - Painters and perfumers combine chemical compounds (for paint and perfume, respectively)
- Painting process is described in detail
- Paragraph note
- The similarity is continued - focus on perfume
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Perfumers layer scents with different evaporation speeds to evoke images and memories
- Focus on perfumes
- Paragraph note
- A potential answer is presented
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Answer - Big companies have taken over perfumes and required cheap substitutes; can't split these from fine perfume
Great perfumes should be considered works of art, as are great paintings/music/literature/etc . . . , even if some have been coopted by corporate profit-seeking.
Key Lines:
Line 7 - A question is introduced Lines 13-18 - Similarities between perfumes and oil paintings are discussed
Lines 29-33 - The comparison is continued
Lines 44-47 - The question is answered
Meta-Structure:
Question/Answer - The Author asks a question in Paragraph 1 that is then answered in Paragraph 4. While the answer to a question is generally the main point of the passage, here, it takes a secondary seat to the comparison between great perfume and great works of art in other media, and the argument that great perfume should be regarded as a work of art. That makes up the bulk of the passage and also serves as a necessary part of the question. Even the answer to the question reflects on this argument.
Comparisons - The passage reaches a comparative conclusion (great perfume should be treated similarly to great works of art in other media), and it does so by bringing up similarities between the compared elements. As such, we should expect questions on these points of comparison.
Last Thoughts:
This passage is interesting in that it presents a Question/Answer structure, but the argument is more about a point that goes into setting that question up. One key way we can tell that that's the case is the certainty between the two parts of the argument.
The Author, without a doubt, believes that great perfume should be considered great art, and studied as such. That's a very certain conclusion. However, in answering the question of why it isn't, she says only that "[p]erhaps" the reason is that perfume is manufactured by corporations looking to make money, and they're messing with the formulas. The uncertainty presented in that answer suggests that it's a secondary point.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AA work of art Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Question Type:
Must Be True
Strategy Overview:
Reiterate the Author's main point, then use notes and the passage to check individual answers that align with it
Answer Anticipation/Relevant Lines:
While this answer seems to be about a specific topic, that topic—art—permeated the entire passage. Paragraph 1 was about those who study art; 2 was about painters and their art; 3 was about perfume, which the Author argues should be viewed as art. In reality, only Paragraph 4 is not focused as much on art, so we should focus our anticipation on the first three paragraphs.
So what did the Author say about art in each of these paragraphs? Paragraph 1 connected art to the stimulation of senses (Lines 5-6). Paragraph 2 talked about the process by which paintings are created. Paragraph 3 talked about how perfumes are created by a similar process, combining sensations (Lines 31-32) to evoke emotion and memory (Lines 40-43).
Let's find an answer aligning with these views.
Answer Explanation:
(Lines 40-43) The Author argues that a brilliant perfumer can devise "an imaginary world" where we discover a "memory of childhood" or a "long-forgotten experience." Since the Author believes that perfumes should be considered art, she believes that art can evoke memories, making this the correct answer.
Key Takeaway:
Be careful about pigeonholing your approach to a question such as this! It'd be easy to decide that a question about art would focus on Paragraph 1, since that spoke about art generally. However, Paragraphs 2 and 3 were about specific types of art, and thus they were in play, as well. And even Paragraph 4, which we downplayed, connected art with the commercial world, so a correct answer could have come from there.
At the same time, be careful in doing so! We saw some answers that were general, but they relied on paragraphs that dealt with specific forms of art. Know the scope of each paragraph, and pick answers that reflect that scope.. -
BIn any work of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 29-32) The Author believes that this is true of perfumes, so she'd agree that it's true of some art. However, there's no indication that the Author believes the harmonious combination of many small sensations is present in any art—she might believe that some art uses a single element to evoke one large sensation. -
CA work of art Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 54-57) The Author states that "fine" perfume is entangled with commerciality, suggesting that there may be some perfumes that count as works of art that are still commercially successful. -
DThe best works of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 26-28; Lines 33-37) The Author noted that paintings become more transparent with time, but she doesn't note that this makes them better. She also notes that perfumes have elements that evaporate at different speeds, but that's not really as they age, since that would presumably happen over an evening. Even then, that discusses only two types of art, and there's no indication that—even if we read those two sections to say the best paintings/perfumes get better with age, which we shouldn't—this is generally true of all art. -
ESome forms of art Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 8-9) The Author decries that some forms of art are deemed better than perfumes, so there's no indication that she herself believes some forms are better than others. In fact, quite the opposite.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Hi I was stuck between a and b 1 reply
Started by Aidyn-Carlson