Reading comp PrepTest 156 · Section 3 · Question 20
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Humanities
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Typical view on jazz’s transition from “swing" to “bebop” (commercialism plays an indirect role, swing became formulaic)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author’s attitude
- The typical view on jazz’s translation from swing to bebop:
- Commercialism played an important but indirect role, as the commercial appeal of swing was still high, but it had become artistically formulaic (first through last sentences)
- The typical view on jazz’s translation from swing to bebop:
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Author's comparison of typical view to "crisis theory" of classical music (dominant musical style's failure to change built up pressure that caused an "eruption")
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author’s attitude
- Comparison, according to the author:
- The writings on jazz's transition to bebop are similar to the wrings on the crisis theory of twentieth-century European classical music (first sentence)
- Cause-and-effect relationship, according to "crisis theory" writers and those who write about jazz's transition to bebop:
- The dominant musical style's failure to progress causes pressure to build up, eventually culminating with an "eruption" of a new, modern musical form (second and last sentences)
- Comparison, according to the author:
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Author on the real cause of bebop, according to the typical account (the commercial incentive to play swing prevented artistic progression; bebop ended commercialism)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author’s attitude
- Author's view:
- Those who write about jazz's transition from swing to bebop really believe that commercialism played a major role in preventing the emergence of a more modern form of jazz (first sentence)
- This version of jazz history assumes that bebop is the logical endpoint of jazz's dalliance with commercialism — the point at which jazz became art and not commerce (fifth and last sentences)
- Cause-and-effect relationship, according to those who write about jazz's transition from swing to bebop:
- Swing's commercial prospects caused many musicians to play swing despite its artistic stagnation (first and second sentences)
- Author's attitude: "clearly suggest" (first sentence); "there is an implicit teleology" (fifth sentence)
- Author's view:
Paragraph 4
- Paragraph note
- Author's criticism of the typical account (even though bebop was new and modern, the musicians still faced commercial realities)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author’s attitude
- Author's view:
- The typical account offered by those who write about jazz's transition from swing to bebop is a false narrative that ignores the commercial reality musicians face (first and second sentences)
- Although bebop was a new style of music, it still emerged in the commercial reality of musical entertainment and is better thought of as a new and more autonomous way to engage with this commercialism (third through last sentences)
- Author's attitude: "it is a poor basis for historical inquiry" (first sentence); "idealizes the circumstances of artistic creation and represses the unpleasant reality that commercial relations permeate all realms of musical entertainment" (second sentence); "indeed willed a new musical subculture" (fourth sentence); "were not trying to disengage from the 'commercial' music world so much as to find a new point of engagement" (last sentence)
- Author's view:
Main Point: Contrary to the account perpetuated by those who write about jazz's transition from swing to bebop, bebop wasn't a reaction to swing's commercial appeal but a new way to engage with the commercial realities of musical entertainment.
Correcting the Record: This passage best fits the Correcting the Record Meta-Structure*. In such a passage, the author will describe a common misconception or false belief. The author will then explain why this belief is false, usually offering an alternative belief. That description fits this passage perfectly, as the author uses the first, second, and third paragraphs to describe a common but erroneous view of how jazz transitioned from swing to bebop. Finally, in the fourth paragraph, the author corrects this belief.
In a Correcting the Record passage, the main point is typically the author's explanation of why the misconception is false or just an assertion that the misconception is false. To identify the main point, we can search for the part of the passage where the author summarizes their explanation. Here, the author summarizes that position in the passage's last sentence. We can use that sentence to answer any question that requires us to know the main point. Alternatively, we can summarize the author's explanation ourselves, which we did for our anticipated main point: "Contrary to the account perpetuated by those who write about jazz's transition from swing to bebop, bebop wasn't a reaction to swing's commercial appeal but a new way to engage with the commercial realities of musical entertainment."
*When a passage falls into the Critical family of Meta-Structures, more than one Meta-Structure will usually work for the passage. You could call this a Criticizing a Viewpoint or Rebutting Critics passage. You could even call this a Phenomenon/Explanation passage, with the people who write about jazz history and the author providing competing explanations of how jazz transitioned from swing to bebop. If you used any of these Meta-Structures to describe this passage, there's a good chance you came up with a similar main point and big-picture understanding of the passage.
Some test-takers may get tripped up by the subtlety of the author's correction. It's easy to assume that one side thinks that commercialism played a major role in jazz's transition to swing, while the other side thinks that commercialism played no role in jazz's transition. Several wrong answer choices will tempt test-takers with this erroneous belief. Instead, the typical, wrong account of jazz's transition from swing to bebop is that bebop represents jazz musicians' sudden (but long-gestating) rejection of swing's commercialism. The author claims that jazz musicians didn't suddenly start operating outside of capitalism when they began playing bebop. Instead, bebop was just a new way to play in the commercial space where all musical entertainment operates.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AThey continued to believe Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Is this consistent with our anticipations that 1940s swing musicians didn't innovate artistically or that the commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating?
Nope. This suggests that there were artistic developments while swing was the dominant form of jazz, but our notes on the proponents' beliefs suggest otherwise. As our note for the third paragraph says, the "commercial incentive to play swing prevented artistic progression." For this reason, we can safely eliminate — or at least table — (A) and move on to the next answer choice.
But if we had to review the passage to eliminate (A), we'd see that the passage doesn't support the claim that 1940s swing musicians thought they were innovative. As the author says, relating the proponents' view, swing's commercial prospects "seduced musicians into going through the motions long after they had any legitimate artistic reason to do so" (P3, S2). The description of these musicians "going through the motions" suggests that they knew they weren't innovating.
-
BThey resented critics' insinuations Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Is this consistent with our anticipations that 1940s swing musicians didn't innovate artistically or that the commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating?
No. Our notes don't suggest that 1940s swing musicians resented any critics' accusations. For this reason, we should resist the urge to review the passage, table (B), and move on to the next answer choice.
Besides, we wouldn't find any support for this answer choice if we re-read the entire passage. According to the proponents, bebop musicians shed jazz's associations with entertainment (P3, S6). But that doesn't mean these musicians' predecessors resented accusations that jazz was a form of popular entertainment.
-
CThey recorded and performed Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
Is this consistent with our anticipations that 1940s swing musicians didn't innovate artistically or that the commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating?
Yes, this is consistent with the belief that commercial pressures to play swing kept 1940s swing musicians from innovating. That doesn't necessarily imply that these swing musicians no longer thought swing was "artistically compelling." But this answer choice is close enough to our anticipation that we should review the passage to see if it's supported.
Given that our note that "commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating" was for the third paragraph, we should review that paragraph to see if (C) is supported. Upon review, we'll see that the proponents claim that swing's commercial prospects led "musicians into going through the motions long after they had any legitimate artistic reason to do so" (P3, S2). Let's focus on the phrase "going through the motions" and the claim that the musicians didn't have "any legitimate artistic reason" to play swing. These suggest that the 1940s swing musicians weren't thrilled that they were playing swing and that there wasn't an "artistically compelling" reason to keep playing that style. This shows that the proponents would almost certainly agree with (C).
Since the text doesn't explicitly say that many 1940s swing musicians "no longer found [swing] to be artistically compelling," we should review the remaining answer choices before selecting (C). But once we eliminate the field, we can select (C) confidently.
-
DThey believed they had Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Is this consistent with our anticipations that 1940s swing musicians didn't innovate artistically or that the commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating?
Nope. Our notes don't suggest that 1940s swing musicians thought they had a responsibility to preserve older jazz traditions. In fact, our notes on the proponents' views suggest that this wasn't their motivation at all. The proponents argue that 1940s swing musicians kept playing swing because they wanted to make money, not because they wanted to preserve earlier jazz traditions. For this reason, we can eliminate (D).
-
EThey sought unsuccessfully to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Is this consistent with our anticipations that 1940s swing musicians didn't innovate artistically or that the commercial pressures to play swing kept them from innovating?
No. Our notes don't suggest that 1940s swing musicians attempted to "liberate their music" from commercialism. In fact, our notes say that they didn't attempt to innovate or liberate at all — they just continued to produce swing music. It was the bebop musicians — not the swing musicians — who eventually "ended commercialism," according to our notes on the proponents' views. For this reason, we can cross off (E).
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.