Reading comp PrepTest 138 · Section 1 · Question 13

Passage

Questions 8-14  .        The characteristic smell or taste of a plant, to  . insects as well as to humans, Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Distinction between primary substances (required for plant growth) and secondary substances (give plants taste/smell)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of two different chemicals in plants, according to the author:
      • Primary substances: required for growth and functioning, found in all plants (third sentence)
      • Secondary substances: No known internal function, different in different plant families, give plants taste and smell (fourth through last sentences)
    • Examples of primary substances, according to the author:
      • Proteins, carbs, vitamins, hormones (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "depends" (first sentence); "required" (third sentence); "found in all plants" (third sentence); "diverse and multitudinous array of chemicals" (fourth sentence); "no known role" (fourth sentence); "Only a few" (fifth sentence); "give plants their distinctive tastes and smells" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Insects' role in the diversity of secondary substances developed (some attract helpful insets, others defend against harmful insects)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationships, according to the author:
      • Mutations cause the emergence of secondary substances (second sentence)
      • Some secondary substances' ability to attract pollinating insects causes the secondary substances to survive via natural selection (fourth sentence)
      • Some secondary substances' biochemical defenses against harmful insects cause the secondary substances to survive via natural selection (sixth sentence)
      • Some secondary substances cause harm or death to insects (seventh sentence)
      • Some secondary substances cause insects to avoid feeding on the plant (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "appear to have played a major role" (first sentence); "undoubtedly" (second sentence); "must pass the muster of natural selection" (third sentence); "must increase" (third sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Progression of evolution after insects (insects evade defenses and become associated with few plants)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • Plants' defenses cause insects to either develop ways avoid defenses (second sentence)
      • These defenses cause insects to become associated with very few plants (fourth and last sentences)
    • Examples of ways insects avoid plants' defenses, according to the author:
      • Detoxification and storing toxins so the insects aren't harmed (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "there has been an evolutionary competition" (first sentence); "must" (second sentence); "fewer and fewer" (last sentence)

Main Point: While secondary substances in plants start out from random mutations, it's a back-and-forth evolutionary "battle" with insects that has resulted in a variety of secondary substances across species of plants.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentences 4 (P1, S4) - Definition of "secondary substances"

P2, S3 - How secondary substances emerge

P2, S4 - How secondary substances survive

P2, S6 - How secondary substances survive

P3, S5 - Outcome of secondary substances

Meta-Structure?

Phenomenon/Explanation: This passage uses a Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure.* The passage spends Paragraph 1 building up to the statement about diverse secondary substances, which give plants their taste and smell but don't help the plant function. That poses a question that needs explaining — if they don't help a plant function, then why do they exist? The passage answers that question/explains the phenomenon in the rest of the passage. Secondary substances exist because random mutations cause them to develop, and then an evolutionary competition with insects causes the beneficial ones (either because they hurt insects or attract pollinating insects) to proliferate.

When a passage falls into the Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure, the author's explanation serves as the passage's main point. Here, the author provides a multi-faceted explanation, which is how we got to our main point above.

*You could also characterize this passage as a Question/Answer passage (Q: How do secondary structures emerge and survive in plants? A: Through natural selection and by attracting/defending insects).

Cause and Effect: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the cause-and-effect relationship, most prominently featured in the second paragraph. Make sure you understand these cause-and-effect relationships because we're bound to get a question or two about them — perhaps even a difficult Strengthen or Weaken question.

Last Thoughts?

This passage includes a lot of science, but we can simplify it to a few basic cause-and-effect relationships to help us understand what's going on. If you don't find memorizing a few basic facts too onerous, keeping these in mind can save you some fact-finding missions as you answer the questions:

  • Mutations cause secondary substances to first appear
  • Some secondary substances survive because they attract pollinating insects
  • Some secondary substances survive because they defend against harmful insects
  • Plants' evolutions and insects' adaptations cause insects to become associated with very few plants

Question prompt

The passage most strongly Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Remind ourselves of the main point of the passage, then head to the answers, focusing on those that line up with the main point and then using our notes/the passage to find the correct answer

Answer Anticipation

This question stem indicates that the correct answer will deal with secondary substances, but that was the topic of the passage as a whole (outside of a discussion of primary substances in a couple lines up front), so we don't have much to go on. In essence, this question asks us to infer, based on the entire passage, a statement that must be true. Such questions can be very challenging. These questions provide little indication as to the topic of the correct answer or where it’ll show up in the passage. Moreover, the correct answer probably won't restate something from the passage. Instead, the question will likely require us to draw a connection between a few different pieces of information.We’ll need to rely on our big-picture understanding of the passage to answer these questions. We should start by reminding ourselves of the main point (either by reviewing what we said after reading the passage or by rereading our answer to the main point question). From there, we can head to the answer choices. If something in an answer choice doesn't seem familiar and isn’t reflected in our notes on each paragraph, we shouldn’t check the passage to see if it was mentioned. Instead, we’ll table it and move on to the next answer choice. If something seems inconsistent with the main point, we can eliminate it. If something seems familiar, consistent with the main point, or reflected in our notes, we’ll use our notes/highlights/underlines to find the part of the passage that proves the answer choice must be true. If we can find that confirmation, we’ll select that answer choice and move on.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Some of them are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem

    (A) Is this consistent with the passage's main point or reflected in our notes?

    Well, our anticipated main point says that "secondary substances in plants start out from random mutations." Plus, this answer choice has weak, easy-to-support language ("Some") that we like to see in the answer choices of Must Be True questions. Since this answer choice is consistent with our main point and uses easily supportable language, we should review the passage to confirm that it is supported.

    The causal relationship we highlighted in the second paragraph should prompt us to review that part of the passage. Upon review, we'll see that a base cause of these secondary substances is random mutation and that these "continue to appear" (P2, S2). So, it must be true that some secondary substances are recent and that they are the results of natural mutations. This confirms that (A) is the correct answer. We can select it and advance to the following question.

  2. B
    They typically contribute to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Is this consistent with the passage's main point or reflected in our notes?

    No. Our note for the first paragraph just says secondary substances "give plants taste/smell." It didn't say that they only contribute to only one of those two. Plus, this answer choice has bold, SCOTUS-y language that expresses a high degree of exclusivity ("but not both"). For these reasons, it's probably best to defer on (B) and check out the remaining answer choices.

    If we had to review the passage, we'd see that (B) is not supported. The passage notes that secondary substances give plants distinctive tastes and smells, but at no point does it state that each one contributes to only one of those two.

  3. C
    Some of them undergo Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Is this consistent with the passage's main point or reflected in our notes?

    Nope. Neither our notes nor our main point discusses whether secondary substances and substances from insects undergo chemical reactions. So, it is probably best to defer on (C) and check out the remaining answer choices.

    If we had to review the passage, we'd see that (C) is not supported. The passage does note that interactions between plants and insects led to the evolution of plants, including the secondary substances they have (P2, S1). And harmful substances need to be dealt with in some way by the insects (P3, S2). But there's no indication that one way they deal with those chemicals is by producing their own chemicals that react with the plant chemicals and changing the plants — that's a whole lot of causality that we didn't note in the passage!

  4. D
    Some species of plants Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Is this consistent with the passage's main point or reflected in our notes?

    No. Neither our notes nor our main point discus suggests that some plants only have one secondary substance. Plus, this answer choice has bold, SCOTUS-y language that expresses a high degree of exclusivity ("only"), even if it's somewhat modulated with the word "some." For these reasons, it's probably best to defer on (D) and check out the remaining answer choices.

    If we had to review the passage, we'd see that Paragraph 1 discussed the presence of secondary substances in plants. While the relevant section is quite a mouthful, it does state that "only a few" of the substances are present in any species of plant (P1, S5), suggesting that each plant has a few, not just one.

  5. E
    A few of them Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Is this consistent with the passage's main point or reflected in our notes?

    Nope. Our note for the first paragraph does not suggest this relationship between primary and secondary substances. In fact, our review for the previous question reminded us that secondary substances have "no known role" in internal plant functioning (P1, S4). For this reason, we can eliminate (E).

    But if you did review the passage, you probably saw that the passage states that secondary substances have no known role in the internal processes of plants, and primary substances are related to those processes. As such, we can infer that secondary substances don't regulate the production of primary substances, as that would mean secondary substances play a role in an internal process.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 81%
  2. B 2%
  3. C 10%
  4. D 6%
  5. E 1%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

View all discussions Start a discussion