Reading comp PrepTest 138 · Section 1 · Question 8

Passage

Questions 8-14  .        The characteristic smell or taste of a plant, to  . insects as well as to humans, Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Distinction between primary substances (required for plant growth) and secondary substances (give plants taste/smell)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of two different chemicals in plants, according to the author:
      • Primary substances: required for growth and functioning, found in all plants (third sentence)
      • Secondary substances: No known internal function, different in different plant families, give plants taste and smell (fourth through last sentences)
    • Examples of primary substances, according to the author:
      • Proteins, carbs, vitamins, hormones (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "depends" (first sentence); "required" (third sentence); "found in all plants" (third sentence); "diverse and multitudinous array of chemicals" (fourth sentence); "no known role" (fourth sentence); "Only a few" (fifth sentence); "give plants their distinctive tastes and smells" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Insects' role in the diversity of secondary substances developed (some attract helpful insets, others defend against harmful insects)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationships, according to the author:
      • Mutations cause the emergence of secondary substances (second sentence)
      • Some secondary substances' ability to attract pollinating insects causes the secondary substances to survive via natural selection (fourth sentence)
      • Some secondary substances' biochemical defenses against harmful insects cause the secondary substances to survive via natural selection (sixth sentence)
      • Some secondary substances cause harm or death to insects (seventh sentence)
      • Some secondary substances cause insects to avoid feeding on the plant (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "appear to have played a major role" (first sentence); "undoubtedly" (second sentence); "must pass the muster of natural selection" (third sentence); "must increase" (third sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Progression of evolution after insects (insects evade defenses and become associated with few plants)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • Plants' defenses cause insects to either develop ways avoid defenses (second sentence)
      • These defenses cause insects to become associated with very few plants (fourth and last sentences)
    • Examples of ways insects avoid plants' defenses, according to the author:
      • Detoxification and storing toxins so the insects aren't harmed (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "there has been an evolutionary competition" (first sentence); "must" (second sentence); "fewer and fewer" (last sentence)

Main Point: While secondary substances in plants start out from random mutations, it's a back-and-forth evolutionary "battle" with insects that has resulted in a variety of secondary substances across species of plants.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentences 4 (P1, S4) - Definition of "secondary substances"

P2, S3 - How secondary substances emerge

P2, S4 - How secondary substances survive

P2, S6 - How secondary substances survive

P3, S5 - Outcome of secondary substances

Meta-Structure?

Phenomenon/Explanation: This passage uses a Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure.* The passage spends Paragraph 1 building up to the statement about diverse secondary substances, which give plants their taste and smell but don't help the plant function. That poses a question that needs explaining — if they don't help a plant function, then why do they exist? The passage answers that question/explains the phenomenon in the rest of the passage. Secondary substances exist because random mutations cause them to develop, and then an evolutionary competition with insects causes the beneficial ones (either because they hurt insects or attract pollinating insects) to proliferate.

When a passage falls into the Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure, the author's explanation serves as the passage's main point. Here, the author provides a multi-faceted explanation, which is how we got to our main point above.

*You could also characterize this passage as a Question/Answer passage (Q: How do secondary structures emerge and survive in plants? A: Through natural selection and by attracting/defending insects).

Cause and Effect: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the cause-and-effect relationship, most prominently featured in the second paragraph. Make sure you understand these cause-and-effect relationships because we're bound to get a question or two about them — perhaps even a difficult Strengthen or Weaken question.

Last Thoughts?

This passage includes a lot of science, but we can simplify it to a few basic cause-and-effect relationships to help us understand what's going on. If you don't find memorizing a few basic facts too onerous, keeping these in mind can save you some fact-finding missions as you answer the questions:

  • Mutations cause secondary substances to first appear
  • Some secondary substances survive because they attract pollinating insects
  • Some secondary substances survive because they defend against harmful insects
  • Plants' evolutions and insects' adaptations cause insects to become associated with very few plants

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Reiterate the main point as we summarized it after reading through the passage, then find the answer that best matches it

Answer Anticipation

As discussed in the Meta-Structure section above, this passage utilizes a Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure. In such a Meta-Structure, the author's explanation generally serves as the passage's main point. Here, the author provides a multi-faceted explanation, which is how we got to our main point: "While secondary substances in plants start out from random mutations, it's a back-and-forth evolutionary "battle" with insects that has resulted in a variety of secondary substances across species of plants."Let's look for an answer choice that captures those ideas.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Although the secondary substances Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not quite. This answer choice is missing our anticipation's emphasis on the author's explanation of how secondary substances emerge and survive in plants. Instead, it just states a couple facts about secondary substances. For this reason, we can eliminate (A) and move straight to the next answer choice.

    Besides, this answer choice doesn't even accurately describe secondary substances. The passage brings up multiple mechanisms by which secondary substances help plants in their "battle" against insects. While one is by operating as a natural defense against harmful insects, another is by attracting pollinating insects. This answer ignores that aspect of the author's definition of secondary substances.

  2. B
    Long–term competition between plants Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    This gets very close! But there's one claim in (B) that's not in our anticipation: that there has been a "narrowing of the range of secondary substances present in plants."

    When an answer choice adds a claim that wasn't in our anticipation, we need to check whether that added claim is accurate. In this case, although the passage notes that any individual plant species has only a subset of secondary substances (P1, S5), the competition with insects has led plants to have a "diverse and multitudinous array" of secondary substances (P1, S4). So, this answer is wrong in saying that there has been a narrowing of the range of secondary substances. In fact, they continue to appear!

  3. C
    The particular secondary substances Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem

    (C) Does this contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Yes! This answer choice captures all the crucial beats of our anticipated main point. It tells us that there has been a back-and-forth evolutionary "battle" with insects ("an evolutionary process of interaction between plants and insects") and that this "battle" has resulted in a variety of secondary substances across species of plants ("The particular secondary substances possessed by different plants ... result in large part from an evolutionary process").

    Now, this answer choice doesn't mention that "secondary substances in plants start out from random mutations." But that's almost certainly OK since the passage spent all of one sentence making that point (P2, S2). And this answer choice adds the claim that secondary substances give plants their "distinctive tastes and smells." When an answer choice adds a claim that wasn't in our anticipation, we need to confirm that the additional claim is accurate. And a quick glance at our note for the first paragraph ("Distinction between primary substances (required for plant growth) and secondary substances (give plants taste/smell)") provides that confirmation. We can justifiably select (C) and advance to the following question.

  4. D
    Due to long–term evolutionary Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    This gets very close! But this claim focuses way too much on the similarity of substances between related species, as that was a minor point in the passage. Additionally, the passage notes that the secondary substances first appear (and continue to appear) because of random mutations (P2, S2), so it's not even clear that insects are the primary cause here! If they were gone, it seems as if secondary substances would still be developing.

  5. E
    Because plant mutations have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not quite. The passage suggests that plants and insects would be engaged in this evolutionary competition even without secondary substances. After all, insects would still eat and pollinate plants, they just would do so without the influence of (and their influence on) these substances! This answer gets the causality mixed up.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 8%
  2. B 11%
  3. C Credited 73%
  4. D 2%
  5. E 6%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.