Reading comp PrepTest 118 · Section 2 · Question 18
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Science
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Background on lichen; Question; New study/Answer
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Lichen = fungi + alga
- Most fungi branches known
- Question - What are the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi?
- New study/Answer - Related to previously known fungi (explains similar appearance)
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Difficulties in studying (Problem/Solution); New study
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Fungi are parasites/symbiotes = hard to separate from associated organism
- Lichen-forming fungi - Particularly hard to separate → Unknown evolutionary background
- New study addressed problem → These fungi related to others
- Prediction - Yet more lichen-forming fungi will be placed on existing fungi family tree branches
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Implication - Old Theory(Assumption)/New Theory
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Old theory - Parasites evolve to be more benign over time
- New theory - Fungi can go in both directions (get benign, then become parasites)
Main Point: While the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming DNA used to be a mystery, a new DNA study has shown that they are close relatives of previously known branches of the fungus family tree, which has implications for certain evolutionary assumptions about parasitic interactions.
Key Lines?Lines 4-6 - A scientific mystery (question) is introduced
Lines 6-11 - A new study resolves the mystery (answers the question)
Lines 16-24 - Why the mystery existed (a problem)
Lines 32-35 - How that problem was solved
Lines 45-50 - An implication of the study (overturns assumption)
Meta-Structure?New Discovery//Question/Answer - The passage introduces a scientific mystery in Lines 4-6 - the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi. A mystery implies a question - what are the evolutionary origins of this fungi? When such a question is posed, the rest of the passage generally dives into answers, with the Author’s preferred or supported answer serving as the main point, and that answer serving as a new discovery (which are frequently discussed in Science passages). Here, the Author jumps right into discussing a new DNA study that has answered the question (Lines 6-11) - these fungi are related to other common fungi that have already been placed on the evolutionary tree. While such an early answer might suggest the passage has a broader main point, here, Paragraph 2 walks through why the mystery existed and how it was resolved, with more specifics on the discovery/answer. And Paragraph 3 talks about an implication of the new discovery. So that answer is the main point of the passage, and the implication will likely be mentioned in the correct answer to the Main Point question, though it doesn’t have to be.
Problem/Solution - Paragraph 2 describes the problem with studying lichen-forming DNA that led to the mystery. This paragraph established that examining fungal DNA is hard because they’re usually parasites/symbiotes, and it’s hard to separate their DNA from the DNA of the associated organism (Lines 16-19). And this is particularly difficult for lichen-forming fungi, for a variety of reasons (Lines 19-28). The passage does show that this problem has been solved by “using new analytical tools” that let researchers isolate fungal DNA, though it’s light on details. Since this is a limited part of the passage, expect at most a question on it.
Old Theory/New Theory (Assumption) - Paragraph 3 discusses an implication of the new research, and that implication overturns a “long-standing evolutionary assumption” (in other words, an old theory - Lines 45-50). That assumption stated parasites evolve to be more benign, but, for fungi, that assumption doesn’t hold. This implication replaces an old theory/assumption with a new theory. Since implications, assumptions, and Old Theory/New Theory structures all tend to show up in questions, there’s a good chance that we’re going to get at least one question on this information.
List - There are a couple short lists in the passage. Lines 11-12 present a list of common fungi of which lichen-forming fungi are close relatives. Lines 20-28 present a list of characteristics of lichen-forming fungi that have made them hard to study, leading to the central mystery in the passage. Both of these are very limited, so expect at most one question on either.
Last Thoughts?There were some numbers in Paragraph 2, but we can always go back to them, so you shouldn’t have spent much time trying to digest them. There’s also some science in the reasons that lichen-forming fungi are hard to study in Paragraph 2, so noting where that shows up is more important than fully understanding what all of it means. This is one of those passages where it’s likely that we’re going to have to head back to the passage for some detail-based questions, and for those, it’s important that we don’t get bogged down in those details while reading so we have time to look for relevant ones while doing the questions!
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AThe DNA of lichen–forming Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
(A) (Lines 16-20; Lines 1-2) The passage establishes that one difficulty in studying fungi is that they’re “usually parasitic or symbiotic,” and so researchers can’t always separate the DNA of the fungi from the associated organism. In lichen, the associated organism is an alga. This answer captures that difficulty, so this is the correct answer.
-
BLichen–forming fungi are difficult Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) (Lines 9-14) The Author does conclude Paragraph 1 by stating that there are visible similarities between lichen and other fungi, but that’s not noted as a difficulty in studying lichen-forming fungi. Rather, it’s something that is accounted for by the results of the new study.
-
CLichen–forming fungi were grouped Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
(C) (Lines 3-5) This answer reflects the mystery that the research was designed to solve, not a difficulty the research needed to overcome in determining the evolutionary origins of these fungi.
-
DLichen–forming fungi are far Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) (Lines 9-12) It’s a bit of a stretch to say that the passage establishes the common fungi listed at the end of Paragraph 1 are said to be more common than lichen. However, even if we say that it is established there, it’s not cited as a problem to researching lichen.
-
EThe DNA of lichen–forming Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) (Lines 19-28) The Author provides a list of reasons that lichen-forming fungi are particularly difficult to study, even as far as fungi are considered. In that list, there’s no mention of the complexity of their DNA.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Started by Dsh
-
Understanding the stimulus 1 reply
Started by amarachicynthia
-
answer choice here 1 reply
Started by Lucas