Reading comp PrepTest 118 · Section 2 · Question 15

Passage

Questions 15-19  .        A lichen consists of a fungus living in symbiosis  . (i.e., a mutually beneficial relationship) with Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Background on lichen; Question; New study/Answer
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Lichen = fungi + alga
    • Most fungi branches known
    • Question - What are the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi?
    • New study/Answer - Related to previously known fungi (explains similar appearance)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Difficulties in studying (Problem/Solution); New study
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Fungi are parasites/symbiotes = hard to separate from associated organism
    • Lichen-forming fungi - Particularly hard to separate → Unknown evolutionary background
    • New study addressed problem → These fungi related to others
    • Prediction - Yet more lichen-forming fungi will be placed on existing fungi family tree branches

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Implication - Old Theory(Assumption)/New Theory
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Old theory - Parasites evolve to be more benign over time
    • New theory - Fungi can go in both directions (get benign, then become parasites)

Main Point: While the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming DNA used to be a mystery, a new DNA study has shown that they are close relatives of previously known branches of the fungus family tree, which has implications for certain evolutionary assumptions about parasitic interactions.

Key Lines?

Lines 4-6 - A scientific mystery (question) is introduced

Lines 6-11 - A new study resolves the mystery (answers the question)

Lines 16-24 - Why the mystery existed (a problem)

Lines 32-35 - How that problem was solved

Lines 45-50 - An implication of the study (overturns assumption)

Meta-Structure?

New Discovery//Question/Answer - The passage introduces a scientific mystery in Lines 4-6 - the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi. A mystery implies a question - what are the evolutionary origins of this fungi? When such a question is posed, the rest of the passage generally dives into answers, with the Author’s preferred or supported answer serving as the main point, and that answer serving as a new discovery (which are frequently discussed in Science passages). Here, the Author jumps right into discussing a new DNA study that has answered the question (Lines 6-11) - these fungi are related to other common fungi that have already been placed on the evolutionary tree. While such an early answer might suggest the passage has a broader main point, here, Paragraph 2 walks through why the mystery existed and how it was resolved, with more specifics on the discovery/answer. And Paragraph 3 talks about an implication of the new discovery. So that answer is the main point of the passage, and the implication will likely be mentioned in the correct answer to the Main Point question, though it doesn’t have to be.

Problem/Solution - Paragraph 2 describes the problem with studying lichen-forming DNA that led to the mystery. This paragraph established that examining fungal DNA is hard because they’re usually parasites/symbiotes, and it’s hard to separate their DNA from the DNA of the associated organism (Lines 16-19). And this is particularly difficult for lichen-forming fungi, for a variety of reasons (Lines 19-28). The passage does show that this problem has been solved by “using new analytical tools” that let researchers isolate fungal DNA, though it’s light on details. Since this is a limited part of the passage, expect at most a question on it.

Old Theory/New Theory (Assumption) - Paragraph 3 discusses an implication of the new research, and that implication overturns a “long-standing evolutionary assumption” (in other words, an old theory - Lines 45-50). That assumption stated parasites evolve to be more benign, but, for fungi, that assumption doesn’t hold. This implication replaces an old theory/assumption with a new theory. Since implications, assumptions, and Old Theory/New Theory structures all tend to show up in questions, there’s a good chance that we’re going to get at least one question on this information.

List - There are a couple short lists in the passage. Lines 11-12 present a list of common fungi of which lichen-forming fungi are close relatives. Lines 20-28 present a list of characteristics of lichen-forming fungi that have made them hard to study, leading to the central mystery in the passage. Both of these are very limited, so expect at most one question on either.

Last Thoughts?

There were some numbers in Paragraph 2, but we can always go back to them, so you shouldn’t have spent much time trying to digest them. There’s also some science in the reasons that lichen-forming fungi are hard to study in Paragraph 2, so noting where that shows up is more important than fully understanding what all of it means. This is one of those passages where it’s likely that we’re going to have to head back to the passage for some detail-based questions, and for those, it’s important that we don’t get bogged down in those details while reading so we have time to look for relevant ones while doing the questions!

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Reiterate the main point as we summarized it after reading through the passage, then find the answer that best matches with it

Answer Anticipation

The passage introduces a scientific mystery in Lines 4-6 - the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi. A mystery implies a question - what are the evolutionary origins of this fungi?When such a question is posed, the rest of the passage generally dives into answers, with the Author’s preferred or supported answer serving as the main point, and that answer serving as a new discovery (which are frequently discussed in Science passages). Here, the Author jumps right into discussing a new DNA study that has answered the question (Lines 6-11) - these fungi are related to other common fungi that have already been placed on the evolutionary tree.While such an early answer might suggest the passage has a broader main point, here, Paragraph 2 walks through why the mystery existed and how it was resolved, with more specifics on the discovery/answer. And Paragraph 3 talks about an implication of the new discovery. So that answer/new discovery is the main point of the passage, and the implication will likely be mentioned in the correct answer to the Main Point question, though it doesn’t have to be:While the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming DNA used to be a mystery, a new DNA study has shown that they are close relatives of previously known branches of the fungus family tree, which has implications for certain evolutionary assumptions about parasitic interactions.

Answer choices

  1. A
    New research suggests that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) (Line 16; Lines 4-11) The passage establishes that fungi are usually parasitic or symbiotic in discussing the difficulties in studying them, leading to the mystery of certain fungi’s evolutionary origins. The new research helped to resolve this problem, leading to the placement of those fungi on the fungal family tree. This answer mischaracterizes the new research and doesn’t discuss the evolutionary origins, so it’s incorrect.

  2. B
    New research has revealed Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) (Lines 9-12; Lines 35-38) The passage does state that the new research involved discovering the DNA sequences of 10 species of lichen-forming fungi, but there’s no indication that they weren’t viewed as separate species before the new research was done. In fact, in treating the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi as a mystery, it’s suggested that they were already viewed as distinct. The new study allowed these fungi to be placed on the family tree, not to be determined as a separate species, so this answer is incorrect. (Additionally, the passage notes that lichen-forming fungi make up at least 10 distinct species, not 1 as this answer suggests.)

  3. C
    New research into the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) (Lines 9-11) The new research has shown that these lichen-forming fungi are closely related to common types of fungi, not species of algae.

  4. D
    New research has isolated Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) (Lines 6-12) This answer captures the new discovery that resolves/answers the mystery of the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi, and that was the central topic of the passage. While it fails to capture the implication of this new discovery, it does correctly describe the new discovery, so it’s the main point of the passage.

  5. E
    New research into the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) (Lines 12-14) This answer focuses on an extraneous part of the passage - the visual similarity between lichen and other fungi. While the passage does compare them on this metric after establishing them as having a common evolutionary origin, resolving why they’re visually similar wasn’t the purpose of the study, nor is it the discovery that the Author focuses on. Rather, she uses that as secondary support - she shows that it makes sense they’re evolutionarily closely related since they look alike.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 10%
  2. B 6%
  3. C 5%
  4. D Credited 68%
  5. E 11%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion