Reading comp PrepTest 107 · Section 2 · Question 27

Passage

Questions 22-27  .        Until about 1970, anyone who wanted to write a  . comprehensive history of medieval English law Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • There is a lack of scholarship based on court records to show how medieval English law affected women.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Court records are vital to ascertaining how law actually affected women in medieval period (second sentence)
      • Examples of what could be ascertained by study of court records:
        • show how often women evaded statutory limitations (fourth sentence)
        • Show how often special statutory privileges were enjoyed (fourth sentence)
        • show how general law not directed specifically at women affected them compared to men (fifth sentence)
      • Only quantitative studies of large numbers of cases would allow any steps towards ascertaining these facts (sixth sentence)
    • Treatises, commentaries, statutes - used by scholars of 19th and early 20th century to ascertain how law was thought or intended to affect women (second-third sentences)
    • Author’s attitude: “dearth” (first sentence); “serious deficiency” (second sentence); “vital importance” (second sentence); “of little help” (fourth sentence); “only quantitative studies” (sixth sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Scholars have not explored court records not only because it would be cumbersome to do so, but principally because there has been little scholarly interest in women’s legal history generally.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Studying court records from Medieval period is cumbersome: language antiquated, never been published, many long pages of records (second-third sentences)
    • Real reason these studies have not been undertaken is that few academics have been interested in women’s legal history (fourth sentence)
    • Most scholars active in this field have begun with an interest in another area and come upon women’s legal history incidentally, not as their primary concern (fifth sentence)
    • Knowledge of English medieval law as it affected women is fragmentary but slowly growing (seventh sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “easily imagine” (first sentence); “daunting” (second sentence); “difficulty” (fourth sentence); “the fact is” (fourth sentence); “very few legal historians” (sixth sentence); “fragmentary at best” (seventh sentence); “slowly improving” (seventh sentence)

Main Point: The dearth of scholarship based on actual court records regarding how medieval English law affected women is due to a lack of academic interest in women’s legal history.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 1(P1 S1) - Statement of phenomenon

P1 S2 - Importance of phenomenon

P2 S2-3 - Superficial explanation

P2 S3 - Author’s explanation

Meta-Structure?

Phenomenon/Explanation: This passage uses a Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure. The phenomenon to be explained is the distinct lack of scholarship on how medieval English law actually affected women. Scholarly work on this topic in the 19th-early 20th centuries has been based on commentaries and treatises and other sources other than court records, which makes this scholarly work a poor gauge of how the law affected women in practice. The superficial explanation of this lack of study is the difficulty of going through the old, voluminous, and challenging source material, but the author argues that this is not the real explanation for why there is a dearth of scholarship. The real reason, the author argues, is a lack of scholarly interest in women’s legal history, including in the medieval period. Legal historians are simply not interested in approaching the subject in the way the author has framed it, so scholarship on how medieval English laws affected women is scarce but growing.

Last Thoughts?

This is a legal passage with a distinctly academic bent, however, the points the author makes about why it is important to look at actual court records instead of commentaries or treatises when studying how medieval English law affected women are interesting ones. The subject may be esoteric, but some of the author’s arguments are based on common sense, and are actually quite accessible.

Question prompt

It can be inferred Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Remind ourselves of the main point of the passage, then head to the answers, focusing on those that line up with the main point and then using our notes/the passage to find the correct answer.

Answer Anticipation

This question asks us to infer, based on the entire passage, a statement that must be true. Such questions can be very challenging. These questions provide little indication as to the topic of the correct answer or where it’ll show up in the passage. Moreover, the correct answer probably won't restate something from the passage. Instead, the question will likely require us to draw a connection between a few different pieces of information.We’ll need to rely on our big-picture understanding of the passage to answer these questions. We should start by reminding ourselves of the main point (either by reviewing what we said after reading the passage or by rereading our answer to the main point question). From there, we can head to the answer choices. If something in an answer choice doesn't seem familiar and isn’t reflected in our notes on each paragraph, we shouldn’t check the passage to see if it was mentioned. Instead, we’ll table it and move on to the next answer choice. If something seems inconsistent with the main point, we can eliminate it. If something seems familiar, consistent with the main point, or reflected in our notes, we’ll use our notes/highlights/underlines to find the part of the passage that proves the answer choice must be true. If we can find that confirmation, we’ll select that answer choice and move on.From our review of the notes we made with respect to each paragraph, we can see that our note for the second paragraph reads: “Scholars have not explored court records not only because it would be cumbersome to do so, but principally because there has been little scholarly interest in women’s legal history generally.” This summary gives us the answer to this question, which is found in P2 S4. Let’s look for this idea in the answer choices.

Answer choices

  1. A
    most modern legal historians' Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem

    (A) Does this answer choice express the author’s opinion regarding the factor that is most responsible for our lack of knowledge about how medieval English law affected women?

    Yes. P2 S4 has given us the answer: “few historians have wanted to write anything approaching women’s legal history in the first place.” This is a slam dunk answer choice that matches our notes, matches our anticipation, and matches the plain text of the passage.

  2. B
    the linguistic and practical Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice express the author’s opinion regarding the factor that is most responsible for our lack of knowledge about how medieval English law affected women?

    No. This answer choice is contradicted by the text. Although the author acknowledges that going through long court documents in foreign languages is cumbersome and difficult, P2 S4 makes clear that the author believes these difficulties are NOT the main factor responsible for the fact that scholars have not reviewed the records. It is a lack of scholarly interest in the subject of women’s legal history that is to blame, not practical difficulties about reviewing records (P2 S4).

  3. C
    a tendency on the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice express the author’s opinion regarding the factor that is most responsible for our lack of knowledge about how medieval English law affected women?

    No. The author acknowledges that earlier scholars of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries did have a tendency to rely on sources that showed only how the law was intended to affect women or was thought to affect women (P1 S2-3), but it is not to this factor that the author attributes our current lack of knowledge. As made clear by P2 S4, the author believes the “relevant scholarship” of looking through court records has not been done because there has been too little scholarly interest in the topic.

  4. D
    the mistaken view that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice express the author’s opinion regarding the factor that is most responsible for our lack of knowledge about how medieval English law affected women?

    No. This answer choice has no support whatever in the passage. It is a complete non sequitur.

  5. E
    the relative scarcity of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice express the author’s opinion regarding the factor that is most responsible for our lack of knowledge about how medieval English law affected women?

    No. Though the author says that there is a distinct lack of scholarly interest in studying and writing about women’s legal history (P2 S4), this lack is not due to the fact that there are no previous studies on the topic. Scholars can and frequently are interested by topics on which there has been little or no previous study. And the author does not say that there would have been more scholarship on women’s medieval legal history if there were more studies done on the more general topic of women’s legal history.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 77%
  2. B 7%
  3. C 3%
  4. D 6%
  5. E 8%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.