Reading comp PrepTest 106 · Section 4 · Question 26

Passage

Questions 22-26  .        As one of the most pervasive and influential  . popular arts, the movies feed into and Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • The movie industry has developed a mutually beneficial marketing relationship with the other mass media.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Origins: Hollywood star system, in which actors were under contract to a movie studio, was a result of the public’s interest in actors’ private lives (second sentence)
      • Public relations agents informed press about stars’ lives, and press promoted movies on the basis of this information (third sentence)
      • Press benefited financially from this, because the public went to the movies based on their publicity and found that movies were created by talented storytellers (fourth sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “pervasive and influential” (first sentence); “feed into and off of” (first sentence); “whetting the public’s appetite” (third sentence); “additional virtue” (third sentence); “art of storytelling” (third sentence); “cultural cross-fertilization” (fourth sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Movies and mass media are interdependent and sustain themselves with the notion that there are always movies worth promoting.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Other media do most of movie promotion for the studios (third sentence)
      • Many media outlets are already promoting movies, so there is a ready-made audience already interested (fourth sentence)
      • TV, radio, magazines, product ads (third sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “mushroomed” (first sentence), “intricately interdependent” (first sentence), “sustains itself” (second sentence); “vast portion” (third sentence); “good business” (fourth sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Problem: mass media promotion model has made movies less emotionally satisfying
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Need to generate publicity has affected creation of movies (first sentence)
      • Studio execs choose subject matter and actors instead of writers and directors (second sentence)
    • Movies are made with an eye toward publicity rather than good art (fourth sentence)
    • This trend is likely to continue because it makes more money than producing emotionally engaging movies (fifth sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “new danger” (fourth sentence), “audience’s curiosity” (fourth sentence), “engaging experience” (fourth sentence), “on the strength of media publicity” (fifth sentence), “word of mouth” (fifth sentence), “intimate relationship” (fifth sentence), “lost” (fifth sentence), “affect audiences emotionally” (sixth sentence), “increasingly rare” (sixth sentence)

Main Point: The system by which the mass media promote movies has created incentives for the film industry to make films that are easy to publicize rather than emotionally engaging.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 4 (P1 S4) - Mass media benefits by promoting movies

P2 S2 - Mass media constantly promoting something

P3 S1 - System of mass media promotion has affected creation of films

P3 S4 - Incentives to produce easily-promotable films rather than good ones

P3 S6 - Films that affect audiences emotionally becoming rare

Meta-Structure?

Importance of Subject: This passage describes why the system by which the mass media came to promote movies is important. The author describes the origins of this system in the 1920s and traces the ways in which the system has grown and shaped the film industry. According to the author, the dependence of the film industry on the mass media promotion machine, and movie studios’ focus on turning the largest profit possible, have led them to focus on creating films that generate a large publicity buzz rather than films that engage emotionally with their audience. The author sees this as a problem and implies that the quality of films has suffered over the years. Moreover, the author says, this trend will likely continue into the future..

The minor Meta-Structure of this passage is Causality. It is the monetary incentive to create films that are easily-promotable that drives the film industry, the author argues, rather than the artistic motive to create films that connect emotionally with their audiences. Back in the 1920s, when the mass media just happened to begin promoting films because people were interested in the lives of movie stars, studios were still interested in creating films that could be considered vital pieces of popular art, but now, when the film industry and the mass media are so interdependent, studios focus on creating films that get viewers into seats just based on the publicity rather than on the content of the film.

Last Thoughts?

This passage is rather hard to classify, because the author clearly points out a problem, but they don’t offer any solutions. The passage traces how the problem of the film industry’s dependence on the mass media arose, and how that problem leads to lower-quality movies, but it does not offer any ways of fixing the issue. This means it can’t really be classified as a Problem/Solution passage. It is simply an explanatory passage where the author has a definite viewpoint that they support using evidence.

Question prompt

The author's position in Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review P3 S1-4, where the author claims that the need to earn the biggest possible profit has led to a movie industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging for the audience. Next, determine weaknesses in that claim to anticipate how to weaken it, and select the answer choice that makes the claim less convincing.

Answer Anticipation

We'll approach Weaken questions in Reading Comprehension in a very similar manner as we would in Logical Reasoning. We can review the excerpt from the passage, just like we'd carefully read an argument in LR. We’ll then interrogate the claim for any weaknesses, as the correct answer on both RC and LR will probably weaken the claim by exploiting a problem. Additionally, causation flaws are commonplace on Weaken questions in both RC and LR, so we should be especially mindful of those.In the section cited in the question stem, the author makes a causal claim. The author is saying that, since mass media promotion of films turns the biggest possible profit for movie studios, those studios now turn out films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging for the audience. The most common way to weaken a causal claim on the LSAT is by undermining the correlation. In this case, the correct answer might show other instances in which the movie studios are focused on turning the biggest possible profit, but they still prioritize creating films with emotional resonance. This technique is often called "cause without the effect." Alternatively, the correct answer could show an effect produced without the supposed cause preceding it. In this case, that might involve movie studios turning out films without emotional resonance even if the mass media’s promotion of new movies does not turn out to lead to the greatest profit for studios. This technique is often called "effect without the cause." Either would undermine the correlation linking the movie studios’ need to generate the biggest possible profit with the production of films lacking emotional resonance.That said, many things could feasibly weaken the causal relationship the author posits ,: so we should keep an open mind as we progress through the answer choices. We'll start by asking ourselves, "Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?"

Answer choices

  1. A
    Many Hollywood studio executives Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?

    No. Even if many studio execs consider a film’s ability to satisfy moviegoers emotionally, that need not outweigh the need to turn the biggest profit for the studio by maximizing the publicity surrounding the film. Indeed, the author would argue that, in the vast majority of cases, that consideration does not outweigh the need to turn a profit, and that’s why the movie industry keeps producing films optimized for publicity rather than optimized for emotional engagement.

  2. B
    Many Hollywood studio executives Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?

    No. Just because studio execs were once on the creative side themselves, it does not mean that they will disregard the profit motive and produce films that satisfy audiences emotionally. As before, with (A), the author would argue that the execs’ past experience does not outweigh the need to turn the biggest profit possible by optimizing films’ publicity potential at the expense of their emotional resonance.

  3. C
    Most writers, producers, and Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?

    No. Just because writers, producers, and directors have “a say” doesn’t mean that they have a significant say in the creative decisions about the production of films. Even if those writers, producers, and directors are interested in making emotionally resonant films, they may well be drowned out by the execs.

    Also, those writers, producers, and directors may not be interested in making emotionally resonant films in the first place. Perhaps they have as big of an eye on the profit a movie makes as their bosses in the studios. In this case, the fact that they have a say in creative decisions would not necessarily make for more emotionally engaging movies.

  4. D
    The decisions made by Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?

    Yes. This answer choice breaks up the correlation that the author claims there is between the need for a film to make a profit and the creation of movies optimized for publicity rather than emotional engagement. According to this answer choice, even if studio execs are focused on earning a profit, the steps they will take to do that will also add to the movie’s ability to engage an audience emotionally. The steps to earn a profit, the answer choice implies, will not lead to less emotional engagement but rather more. Thus, this answer choice is a good example of the cause being present without the effect.

    This answer choice would definitely weaken the causal relationship that the author sets up in the first part of the third paragraph between studio execs’ need to take all possible steps to earn a profit and the adoption of filmmaking methods that decrease a movie’s emotional resonance.

  5. E
    Often the U.S. mass Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice make the claim that the movie studios’ pursuit of the biggest profit has led to an industry that makes films optimized for publicity rather than films that are emotionally engaging less convincing?

    No. This answer choice doesn’t appear to have anything to do with the causal relationship that the author sets up between the need for studio execs to earn a profit and the production of films lacking emotional resonance. The mass media’s influence over the content of films may mean that the films end up being more emotionally resonant or less emotionally resonant. There is no way of saying which way that factor would swing the causal connection the author posits.

    So this is not the right answer choice.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 10%
  2. B 11%
  3. C 17%
  4. D Credited 59%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • C vs D 4 replies

    Started by Abigail-Okereke