PrepTest 119
[lcid:3573] Prep Test 119 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Studies have shown that
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Argument
Valid or Flawed
Flawed
Question Type
Weaken Questions
Stimulus Summary
Sports food vs. Common food - Same nutrients, but 2-3x more expensive
Conclusion - The only reason to buy them is because of expensive marketing campaigns
Answer Anticipation
The argument compares sports foods to common foods. It brings up a similarity (nutrition) and a difference (cost) before concluding the reason that people purchase them - expensive marketing campaigns.
It’s clear that people aren’t buying them because of nutritional differences or cost (when there are acceptable alternatives that are multiple times less expensive). However, those reasons (and falling for marketing campaigns) aren’t the only ones that could potentially lead someone to buy these foods.
This argument brings two ideas together to lead to an anticipation here - it concludes an explanation based on a comparison. As such, we can anticipate that the answer will bring up an alternative explanation for the purchase - and it’ll likely highlight a difference between the sports food and the common food that makes the former preferable to athletes despite the higher cost and lack of nutritional benefit.
Answer choices
-
ASports foods are occasionally Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
“Occasionally” makes this answer pretty weak. Additionally, this answer doesn’t establish that these athletes don’t also eat common foods, which would be necessary to pose it as an alternative explanation for athlete behavior. -
BMany grocery stores carry Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
This answer brings up another similarity - they’re about as easy to get as each other from a grocery store. If that’s the case, then easier access isn’t a reason that sports foods sell so well, and thus, if anything, this answer strengthens the argument. -
CSports foods are easier Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
This answer brings up a difference between sports foods and regular foods that would make the former preferable to athletes, thus providing an explanation for why they’d purchase it that doesn’t have to do with expensive advertising campaigns. In providing an alternative explanation while differentiating sports foods from common foods, this answer weakens the argument. -
DRegular foods contain vitamins Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
It was already established that regular and sports foods contain the same nutrients in the same questions, so bringing up what those nutrients are won’t do much of anything to the argument. -
ESports foods can nutritionally Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
This is more or less already stated in the stimulus when it says that sports foods and common foods have the same nutrients in the same quantities, so this answer doesn’t have an effect on the argument.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Instructor's Speech Issues 0 replies
Started by Yuzhuo-Cao
-
Started by JazaneElaine
-
Why not M/P? 4 replies
Started by jbenav246@gmail.com