Reading comp PrepTest 150 · Section 1 · Question 14

Passage

Questions 13-19  . Passage A  .       In a 1978 lecture titled "The Detective Story,"  . Jorge Luis Borges observes that, Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Passage A

Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Borges's "special type of reader" in detective fiction
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Definition of the "special type of reader":
      • Confronts literature with suspicions, reads any piece of literature like a detective novel (second sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "insight into the general nature of literature" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Borges: The way books are read determines a book's genre
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Comparisons, according to Borges:
      • The reader's participation in the "aesthetic event" of literature is not external to the literature but instead central to it (second sentence)
      • Readers read books of the same genre in the same way (last sentence)
      • Genre is determined by how readers approach the literary work rather than the work's formal elements (last sentence)

Passage B

Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Author: Classifying genres based on the works' themes is difficult, so a better classification system is based on "reading protocols"
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Comparison, according to the author:
      • Classifying genres based on thematic similarities leads to so many "borderline cases," so a more fruitful way to define genres is based on "reading protocols" (first through third sentences)
    • Definition of "reading protocols":
      • The way we read, respond to sentences, and make sense of the text (third sentence)
    • Point of intersection with passage A:
      • The discussion of "reading protocols" recalls passage A's discussion of detective novels' "special kind of reader," the description of the "aesthetic event" between reader and text, and the passage's conclusion
    • Author's attitude: "taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious" (first sentence); "arises so often" (second sentence); "fails to demarcate genres entirely" (second sentence); "more fruitful" (third sentence); "particularly rich" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Author: Need to determine how literary works promote reading protocols; examples of reading protocols
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Examples of reading protocols, according to the author:
      • When reading poetry, we pay more attention to the sound of words (second sentence)
      • When reading science fiction, we pay special attention to the differences between our world and the "world of the story" (fourth and last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "Our major critical effort must therefore be" (first sentence); "particular attention" (last sentence)

Main Points?

Passage A: Borges argues that the detective novel highlights how a literary work's genre is determined by how readers approach the work, not by the work's formal characteristics.

Passage B: It's better to classify literary genres based on the "reading protocols" the genre promotes, so critics should explore how genres create and encourage these protocols.

Key Lines?

Passage A:

Paragraph 2, Sentence 3 (P2, S3) - Author's conclusion

Passage B:

P1, S3 - Author's subsidiary conclusion

P2, S1 - Author's main conclusion

Meta-Structure? Relationship Between Passages?

Relationship - Similar Viewpoints: The authors of these two passages have very similar views. The authors share the belief that literary genres are primarily defined by how readers interact with the literary works. The author of passage A, parroting Borges, refers to this interaction as an "aesthetic event" that the reader creates when engaging with literature (PA, P2, S1). On the other hand, passage B's author refers to the interaction between reader and text as "reading protocols." Still, both authors believe that readers will interact with different genres' works in different ways. Passage A provides an example of the suspicion a detective-story reader will bring to the text (PA, P1, S2), while passage B provides examples of how poetry and science-fiction readers will confront texts in those genres (PB, P2, S2-5). Because these authors' views are very similar, we should expect several questions that ask us to identify similarities between the passages and the authors' beliefs.

Last Thoughts?

The questions on comparative passages frequently ask about the authors' positions, so it's critical that we have a firm understanding of each author's beliefs. It's not difficult to discern the opinions of passage B's author. However, many test-takers have trouble unpacking whether passage A's author expresses any beliefs. After all, the argument in passage A is mostly attributed to Borges.

However, a few clues help us determine that the author of passage A agrees with Borges. First, the author expresses a little attitude at the end of the first paragraph. The author says Borges's interest in the detective novel "draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature" (PA, P1, S3). By characterizing Borges's claims with a positive term like "insight," the author suggests that they agree with Borges's argument. When the author elaborates on this "insight into the general nature of literature" in the second paragraph, we can infer that the author agrees with these claims. Moreover, even if the author mostly attributes claims made in the second paragraph to Borges, the author drops this attribution in the last sentence: "Thus, what unites works belonging to the same genre is the way those works are read, rather than, say, a set of formal elements found within the works" (PA, P2, S3). By not crediting Borges in this sentence, the author subtly lets us know that they agree with this conclusion.

Question prompt

The authors of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the main point of both passages, use notes or highlighted/underlined text in the passage to recall the authors' attitudes, and find the answer that both authors would agree with

Answer Anticipation

This question asks us about the authors' views but doesn't provide any insight into the topic of the correct answer or where the supporting information might show up in the passages. This means the correct answer is likely to relate back to the authors' main points. As such, we'll need to rely on our big-picture understanding of the passage to answer this question. We should start by reminding ourselves of each author's main point. We can also review any notes about the author's attitude or any text we highlighted because it expressed the author's opinion. After doing that, we can head to the answer choices, tabling those that don't line up with the main point. For those answer choices that conform to the authors' main points, we'll use our notes and the passage to see if it's correct.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Short works of fiction Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this seem consistent with the authors' main points or what you remember reading about the authors' opinions?

    Probably not. Although the main points of both passages discuss categorizing works of fiction by genre, neither describes the length of the literary works. So, we have no reason to believe the authors would agree with this, and we can remove it from contention.

  2. B
    The first works of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this seem consistent with the authors' main points or what you remember reading about the authors' opinions?

    Probably not. Neither main point brings up the authors' intent when writing genre fiction.

  3. C
    There is no scholarly Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this seem consistent with the authors' main points or what you remember reading about the authors' opinions?

    No. Both authors' main points address how to demarcate the boundaries of literary genres. If both authors wrote these passages to prove a point about this demarcation, they must think there is some value in that exercise.

  4. D
    Genre stories are typically Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this seem consistent with the authors' main points or what you remember reading about the authors' opinions?

    Probably not. Neither main point brings up the "literary value" of genre works or defying the conventions of a genre. Indeed, neither author describes genre fiction's literary value at any point in their passages. Therefore, we can cross this off.

  5. E
    Two works of fiction Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem

    (E) Does this seem consistent with the authors' main points or what you remember reading about the authors' opinions?

    Probably! Both passages' main points claim that a literary work's genre is not based on the work's formal characteristics — like the plot, characters, and setting — but on how the reader interacts with the text. This also uses very weak, easy-to-prove language ("could") that we want on this type of question. So, we can see that the authors would agree that two works with similar plots, characters, and settings could belong to different genres if the readers interact with the texts in two different ways.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 2%
  2. B 3%
  3. C 8%
  4. D 11%
  5. E Credited 75%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion