Logical reasoning PrepTest 138 · Section 2 · Question 5
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
ASince there are relatively Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen (Principle)
Stimulus Summary:
P: Person's actions don't threaten wild animal populations → Law designed to protect wild animals shouldn't be enforced against them
A: A law designed to protect wild snake populations shouldn't be enforced against snake charmers
Answer Anticipation:
In most of these Principle/Application questions, the Application will fail to establish that the sufficient condition of the Principle is met. Here, the principle's sufficient condition is that a person's actions don't threaten a wild animal population. Since the Application wants to apply this Principle to snake charmers, it would need to establish that the snake charmers aren't a threat to these snake populations, so let's find that in the answer choices.
Answer Explanation:
This answer establishes that the snake charmers aren't a threat to the wild snake populations. If that's the case, the Principle applies to them and the law shouldn't be enforced against them, justifying the application.
Key Takeaway:
Principle/Application questions generally feature an Application that fails to meet the sufficient condition of the Principle. When that's the case, find the answer that connects the details that are established in the Principle to that sufficient condition. -
BMany attempts to prosecute Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. The success in prosecution, the knowledge of the prosecutors, and the procedures used to capture snakes are all out of scope of the Principle. -
CVery few, if any, Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The knowledge of the snake charmers as to the law is out of scope of the Principle, which is just about the threat to wild animal populations. -
DSnake populations are much Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The law designed to protect wild snake populations is on the books, so it doesn't matter how threatened they are compared to other animals. Also, as a relative statement, this doesn't determine if wild snakes are very, somewhat, or not at all threatened, so this answer doesn't provide much information. -
ESnake charmers capture wild Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. The motives behind the snake charmers in capturing snakes are out of scope of the Principle.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.