Logical reasoning PrepTest 138 · Section 2 · Question 18

Question prompt

Every delegate to the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Must Be True Questions / Quantifiers Questions / Sufficient & Necessary Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Every party member at Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This is an illegal reversal of the first conditional.
  2. B
    At least some speakers Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no way to make inferences about people who aren't delegates or party members, as that would involve the contrapositive of the first statement, but that couldn't be combined with the some statement since we can't contrapose those.
  3. C
    At least some speakers Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Must Be True

    Stimulus Summary:
    (1) Delegate to convention → Party Member
    (2) Delegate to convention-some-Government official at convention
    (3) Government official at convention → Speaker at convention

    Answer Anticipation:
    A Must Be True question with a mix of conditionals and quantified statements? Time to dust off our skills on making inferences using them.

    Taking a look, each of the conditionals has a sufficient condition that overlaps with a term in the some statement. That's a combination that's allowed—after all, if all of a group has a feature, and some of that group has another feature, then some members of the group must have both. The question is going to be if we can combine all three to reach an inference, as that's likely to be the correct answer if possible. So let's start by combining 1 and 2:
    Party member-some-Government official at convention

    Taking a look at that, it shares a term with the third statement, and it's the sufficient condition of the conditional that shows up in the some statement. That's the same pattern as our initial inference, so we can make the same type of inference:
    Party member-some-Speaker at convention

    Answer Explanation:
    Just as we anticipated! This answer draws an inference by combining all three statements.

    Key Takeaway:
    Learn how to make valid inferences from conditionals and quantified statements—it's worth a couple points on the exam!
  4. D
    All speakers at the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer is an illegal reversal of the second conditional.
  5. E
    Every government official at Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer would require chaining only conditionals to get another conditional ("Every"), but the conditionals don't directly overlap.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 3%
  2. B 5%
  3. C Credited 80%
  4. D 2%
  5. E 10%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • Map Out 3 replies

    Started by teddyteddted