Logical reasoning PrepTest 138 · Section 2 · Question 14
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
Awhether cocker spaniels are Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. There's no discussion of other dogs, so this answer is out of scope. -
Bwhether there are more Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Other breeds are out of scope—the stimulus is about registered cocker spaniels, and a found cocker spaniel. -
Cwhether the city's animal Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The conclusion is about a cocker spaniel found in the area of Flynn Heights, so this answer about dogs found in other areas is out of scope. -
Dwhether the number of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. In talking about pets instead of just dogs (and, really, cocker spaniels), this answer is out of scope. -
Ewhether residents of Flynn Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Argument Evaluation
Stimulus Summary:
Flynn Heights has more registered cocker spaniels than all other neighborhoods combined, so a cocker spaniel found in the area is likely owned by a Flynn Heights resident.
Answer Anticipation:
If there are more cocker spaniels living in Flynn Heights than all other neighborhoods combined, then a cocker spaniel found in the area does likely belong to someone who lives there. So what's the flaw?
Always look at qualifiers! The premise isn't about cocker spaniels living in these areas, but rather about cocker spaniels registered in these areas. In order to analyze the conclusion, then, we'd need to know that the number of registered cocker spaniels is representative of the total number of cocker spaniels. In other words, are FLynn Heights cocker spaniels more likely to be registered than others?
Answer Explanation:
This answer highlights the jump between registered cocker spaniels and the total number of cocker spaniels in this area. If residents of Flynn Heights are equally likely to register their dogs as residents of other areas, then the argument holds together. If they're less likely, it also holds together. If they're more likely, it falls apart.
Key Takeaway:
Pay attention to qualifiers! The premise here wasn't about cocker spaniels—it was about registered cocker spaniels. Qualifying the larger group means that it's only talking about a subset of that group, and thus the argument may be skewed.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Am I off track? 1 reply
Started by Abigail-Okereke
-
Clarification 1 reply
Started by tselimovic