Logical reasoning PrepTest 134 · Section 1 · Question 8
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AIn an effort to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer highlights the plants—the bottom of the ecosystem—determining the outcome for something higher up on the food chain, so this answer reinforces the theory. -
BAfter hunting virtually eliminated Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Weaken
Stimulus Summary:
Bottom-Up Theory - Plants determine herbivores determine predators, so plants are the driver of population
Implication - Reduction in predator populations won't change much
Answer Anticipation:
The stimulus lays out a prediction based on the Bottom-Up Theory—if the predator population changes, then there should be little impact on the rest of the ecosystem. In order to weaken the theory, then, the correct answer will likely bring up a scenario that shows that prediction not happening—a predator population going down without it affecting the rest of the ecosystem.
Answer Explanation:
This answer shows a predator population changing, and the ecosystem also changing as a result. That violates the prediction made that predator population decreases should have "little impact" on the rest of the ecosystem, so it weakens the theory that makes that prediction.
Key Takeaway:
Theories/hypotheses are meant to describe phenomenon, and they're used to predict outcomes. If those predictions don't come true, then that theory/hypothesis is weakened. -
CAfter many of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer shows a change in the population from the bottom of the food chain having effects higher up on the food chain, so it reinforces the Bottom-Up Theory. -
DAfter a new species Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. If anything, this answer aligns with the Bottom-Up Theory by showing that a change not affecting the availability of edible plants didn't change herbivore populations. -
EPlants that are a Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Since there's been no change to the predator population, this answer doesn't undercut the theory. It's unclear what effect it has on the theory but, if anything, it aligns with it by showing that a thriving edible plant population can stabilize a population of animals that eat them despite extensive hunting.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Answer choices B and E 2 replies
Started by shafieiava