Logical reasoning PrepTest 134 · Section 1 · Question 8

Question prompt

According to the "bottom–up" Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Weaken Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    In an effort to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer highlights the plants—the bottom of the ecosystem—determining the outcome for something higher up on the food chain, so this answer reinforces the theory.
  2. B
    After hunting virtually eliminated Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Weaken

    Stimulus Summary:
    Bottom-Up Theory - Plants determine herbivores determine predators, so plants are the driver of population
    Implication - Reduction in predator populations won't change much

    Answer Anticipation:
    The stimulus lays out a prediction based on the Bottom-Up Theory—if the predator population changes, then there should be little impact on the rest of the ecosystem. In order to weaken the theory, then, the correct answer will likely bring up a scenario that shows that prediction not happening—a predator population going down without it affecting the rest of the ecosystem.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer shows a predator population changing, and the ecosystem also changing as a result. That violates the prediction made that predator population decreases should have "little impact" on the rest of the ecosystem, so it weakens the theory that makes that prediction.

    Key Takeaway:
    Theories/hypotheses are meant to describe phenomenon, and they're used to predict outcomes. If those predictions don't come true, then that theory/hypothesis is weakened.
  3. C
    After many of the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer shows a change in the population from the bottom of the food chain having effects higher up on the food chain, so it reinforces the Bottom-Up Theory.
  4. D
    After a new species Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. If anything, this answer aligns with the Bottom-Up Theory by showing that a change not affecting the availability of edible plants didn't change herbivore populations.
  5. E
    Plants that are a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. Since there's been no change to the predator population, this answer doesn't undercut the theory. It's unclear what effect it has on the theory but, if anything, it aligns with it by showing that a thriving edible plant population can stabilize a population of animals that eat them despite extensive hunting.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 3%
  2. B Credited 84%
  3. C 4%
  4. D 4%
  5. E 6%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion