Logical reasoning PrepTest 134 · Section 1 · Question 1

Incorrect. This answer goes a step beyond the argument—there's never a statement advising against seeking a second opinion.

Incorrect. First, there's no discussion of a second opinion being "necessary," just "advisable." Second, the discussion of the first doctor feeling judged was a reason to believe these opinions could be awkward.

Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument

Valid or Flawed:
Valid

Question Type:
Main Point

Stimulus Summary:
Second opinions are good, but:
(1) The patient worries they'll alienate their doctor
(2) The first doctor knows they're being second-guessed
(3) The second doctor is analyzing the first
So it can be a bit awkward.

Answer Anticipation:
The argument starts by bringing up a course of action before pivoting to it being awkward. Pivots are often conclusions, and this one gives the author's opinion of the course of action, so there's a great chance it's the main point.

That's backed up by it being followed with a "since," showing that the next statement is a premise backing up what came before it. In fact, the entire rest of the argument is a list of how getting a second opinion can be awkward for each of the parties involved, so that pivot statement is, in fact, the main point.

Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects the author's opinion on the topic of second opinions, which is both structurally and logically indicated to be the conclusion.

Key Takeaway:
Pivot statements are frequently conclusions, especially when they offer an opinion.

Incorrect. This answer provides a reason to believe that second opinions can be awkward by describing the awkwardness of the second doctor.

Incorrect. This answer provides a reason to believe that second opinions can be awkward by describing the awkwardness of the patient.