Reading comp PrepTest 125 · Section 3 · Question 7

Passage

Questions 1-7  .        Most of what has been written about Thurgood  . Marshall, a former United States Supreme Court Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Current focus of scholarship and author’s interest in Marshall’s strategy/methodology
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Traditional scholarship on Marshall:
      • Marshall’s time as Supreme Court Justice
    • Author’s focus:
      • Marshall’s technical legacy — how his work with the NAACP was strategically/methodologically innovative
      • Marshall’s innovation — how he predetermined and carefully crafted/coordinated legal strategy
    • Author’s attitude: “reveals a strategic and methodological legacy” (lines 9-10); “forever changed the landscape of public interest law” (lines 14-15); “meticulously crafted and carefully coordinated” (lines 19-20)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • One aspect of Marshall’s innovative strategy (the test case strategy)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 1: Test case strategy — picking cases that have a good chance of changing law and feature sympathetic litigants
    • Author’s attitude: “careful evaluation” (line 23); “essential element” (line 27); “carefully selected” (line 31)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Another aspect of Marshall’s innovation (use of sociological and psychological stats) and criticism of it
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 2: Sociological and psychological stats to show public harms in violation of constitutional principles
    • Example of stats Marshall used:
      • The harm of segregation
    • Criticism of Marshall’s use of stats:
      • Gives judges non-legal reasons to reach fuzzy legal decisions

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Marshall’s legacy on public interest law
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author’s view:
      • Public interest firms have increased and used these strategies
      • The legacy is somewhat unexpected, since Marshall’s strategy is used for both consumer advocacy and conservative purposes
      • But Marshall’s strategies are the norm today
    • Author’s attitude: “grown substantially” (line 48); “widely adopted” (lines 48-49); “might seem surprising” (line 57); “have become the norm” (line 61)

Main Point: Focusing on Thurgood Marshall’s work with the NAACP highlights innovative strategies he developed in the field of public interest law that have become standard in that practice today.

Key Lines?

Lines 17-20 - Marshall’s innovation

Lines 21-25, 30-32 - One aspect of the innovation

Lines 34-35 - Another aspect of the innovation

Lines 40-42 - A criticism of this second aspect

Lines 57-59 - A surprising aspect of his legacy

Lines 61-62 - His legacy

Meta-Structure?

Innovative Subject: While much more common in Humanities passages, a discussion of a subject’s innovation is one of the most common Meta-Structures in the RC section. Here, the passage focuses explicitly on innovations spearheaded by Marshall and the NAACP in the public interest space. The innovation is described in Lines 17-20, two aspects are then explored through Paragraphs 2 and 3, and the legacy of these innovations (including a surprising one) is discussed in Paragraph 4. When a passage falls into the Innovative Subject Meta-Structure, the main point focuses on that innovation, as reflected in our main point above.

Examples: The passage provides a couple of examples in a few places. First, the author discusses examples of the type of sociological and psychological statistics used by Marshall in his innovative strategy (Lines 35-37). Later, the author presents examples of groups that have used this strategy in more recent times (Lines 51-54). Both of these are fairly limited in scope and back up minor points made by the author, so we should expect a question or two on them, but they won’t be a major focus of the questions.

Last Thoughts?

One element that has a solid chance of being the feature of a question is the “surprising” use of Marshall’s strategy by conservative public interest lawyers. When an author notes that something is surprising or unexpected, it almost always gets asked about, so be sure to note such features when they show up!

Question prompt

According to the passage, Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Find where criticism by legal scholars is presented, then find an answer reflecting their viewpoint

Answer Anticipation

We should always note criticisms and viewpoints. So, we should absolutely have noted criticism raised by legal scholars. Thus, we should be able to find this view in Paragraph 3, where Marshall’s use of certain statistics was mentioned. There, the legal scholars criticized the use of sociological and psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions. Let’s find an answer reflecting that criticism.

Answer choices

  1. A
    the ideology Marshall used Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice say that legal scholars criticized the use of sociological or psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions?

    Nope. The “ideological content” of Marshall’s work as a lawyer is mentioned in Paragraph 1, but there’s no criticism leveled against his views.

  2. B
    recent public interest campaigns
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice say that legal scholars criticized the use of sociological or psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions?

    No. The only recent public interest campaign is mentioned in Paragraph 4, with no criticism by legal scholars attached.

  3. C
    the use of Marshall's Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice say that legal scholars criticized the use of sociological or psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions?

    Negative. The author notes that it’s “surprising” that politically conservative lawyers are using the strategies pioneered by Marshall, but she doesn’t criticize that use, nor does she bring up how legal scholars feel about it.

  4. D
    the use of psychological Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) Does this answer choice say that legal scholars criticized the use of sociological or psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions?

    Yes! Paragraph 3 discusses Marshall’s use of psychological statistics in court cases. Legal scholars criticize this for providing a nonlegal basis for judicial decisions. This answer is therefore correct.

  5. E
    the set of criteria Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice say that legal scholars criticized the use of sociological or psychological statistics as providing nonlegal material as a basis for judicial decisions?

    Nope. The criteria are discussed in Paragraph 2, where the test case strategy is outlined, but no criticism is offered in that section of the passage.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 5%
  2. B 1%
  3. C 2%
  4. D Credited 91%
  5. E 2%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion