Reading comp PrepTest 125 · Section 3 · Question 3

Passage

Questions 1-7  .        Most of what has been written about Thurgood  . Marshall, a former United States Supreme Court Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Current focus of scholarship and author’s interest in Marshall’s strategy/methodology
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Traditional scholarship on Marshall:
      • Marshall’s time as Supreme Court Justice
    • Author’s focus:
      • Marshall’s technical legacy — how his work with the NAACP was strategically/methodologically innovative
      • Marshall’s innovation — how he predetermined and carefully crafted/coordinated legal strategy
    • Author’s attitude: “reveals a strategic and methodological legacy” (lines 9-10); “forever changed the landscape of public interest law” (lines 14-15); “meticulously crafted and carefully coordinated” (lines 19-20)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • One aspect of Marshall’s innovative strategy (the test case strategy)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 1: Test case strategy — picking cases that have a good chance of changing law and feature sympathetic litigants
    • Author’s attitude: “careful evaluation” (line 23); “essential element” (line 27); “carefully selected” (line 31)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Another aspect of Marshall’s innovation (use of sociological and psychological stats) and criticism of it
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 2: Sociological and psychological stats to show public harms in violation of constitutional principles
    • Example of stats Marshall used:
      • The harm of segregation
    • Criticism of Marshall’s use of stats:
      • Gives judges non-legal reasons to reach fuzzy legal decisions

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Marshall’s legacy on public interest law
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author’s view:
      • Public interest firms have increased and used these strategies
      • The legacy is somewhat unexpected, since Marshall’s strategy is used for both consumer advocacy and conservative purposes
      • But Marshall’s strategies are the norm today
    • Author’s attitude: “grown substantially” (line 48); “widely adopted” (lines 48-49); “might seem surprising” (line 57); “have become the norm” (line 61)

Main Point: Focusing on Thurgood Marshall’s work with the NAACP highlights innovative strategies he developed in the field of public interest law that have become standard in that practice today.

Key Lines?

Lines 17-20 - Marshall’s innovation

Lines 21-25, 30-32 - One aspect of the innovation

Lines 34-35 - Another aspect of the innovation

Lines 40-42 - A criticism of this second aspect

Lines 57-59 - A surprising aspect of his legacy

Lines 61-62 - His legacy

Meta-Structure?

Innovative Subject: While much more common in Humanities passages, a discussion of a subject’s innovation is one of the most common Meta-Structures in the RC section. Here, the passage focuses explicitly on innovations spearheaded by Marshall and the NAACP in the public interest space. The innovation is described in Lines 17-20, two aspects are then explored through Paragraphs 2 and 3, and the legacy of these innovations (including a surprising one) is discussed in Paragraph 4. When a passage falls into the Innovative Subject Meta-Structure, the main point focuses on that innovation, as reflected in our main point above.

Examples: The passage provides a couple of examples in a few places. First, the author discusses examples of the type of sociological and psychological statistics used by Marshall in his innovative strategy (Lines 35-37). Later, the author presents examples of groups that have used this strategy in more recent times (Lines 51-54). Both of these are fairly limited in scope and back up minor points made by the author, so we should expect a question or two on them, but they won’t be a major focus of the questions.

Last Thoughts?

One element that has a solid chance of being the feature of a question is the “surprising” use of Marshall’s strategy by conservative public interest lawyers. When an author notes that something is surprising or unexpected, it almost always gets asked about, so be sure to note such features when they show up!

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Review the strategies used by the NAACP/Marshall, then find an answer that presents them in an environmental context

Answer Anticipation

These Application/Analogous Situation questions closely resemble Parallel Reasoning questions in Logical Reasoning. We want to find the answer choice that is structurally similar to the element we're asked to analogize. The correct answer won't have the same subject matter as the passage; instead, it will feature similar characteristics or themes as the element from the passage. Therefore, we should start by reviewing the key features of the element we're asked to parallel.In this case, the question asks us to analogize from the “strategies” used by Marshall, suggesting that the correct answer might be supported by information throughout the passage. However, the question stem specifically asks about a “pair[]” of tactics, and we know that the author introduced two aspects of Marshall’s strategy — one in Paragraph 2, and one in Paragraph 3. Thus, it’s likely that the answers will each feature two tactics, and the correct answer will have one that matches up with each aspect of the strategy discussed in the passage.So, let’s review those tactics. In Paragraph 2, the author discusses Marshall’s “test case strategy.” In this aspect, Marshall found cases with sympathetic and committed litigants who were involved in cases with important precedential nuances. In Paragraph 3, the author discusses Marshall’s use of sociological and psychological statistics.Let’s find an answer where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case.

Answer choices

  1. A
    a decision to pursue Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem

    (A) Does this present a situation where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case?

    Yep. The two tactics outlined in this answer choice each line up with one of the aspects of Marshall’s strategy as described in the passage. The first tactic reflects the test case strategy, where the case is selected if it has a good chance of changing law and features sympathetic litigants. The second tactic reflects Marshall’s reliance on statistical information to show the harm caused in a case. Since this answer has tactics that are analogous to the ones used by Marshall, it’s the correct answer. We can justifiably select it and move on to the next question without assessing the remaining answer choices.

  2. B
    acceptance of a pollution Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this present a situation where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case?

    Not really. The practical urgency of the case sounds more like taking a case as the opportunity arises, but let’s say that there is some value in choosing to take a practically urgent case. Even then, there’s no indication that Marshall assigned cases to lawyers based on their level of fame, as this second tactic suggests!

  3. C
    preference for pursuing a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this present a situation where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case?

    Nope. Marshall carefully selected cases and litigants, not specific courts or judges, as this answer discusses.

  4. D
    acceptance of a pollution Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this present a situation where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case?

    No. This suggests that the environmental-advocacy firm is drumming up public interest in the case. The author never suggested that Marshall did that. The author also never says that Marshall accepted cases based on the needs of the plaintiff.

  5. E
    thorough and painstaking research Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this present a situation where an environmental-advocacy firm carefully selects the cases they bring and uses statistical data to make their case?

    Not quite. A painstaking review of precedents arguably aligns with taking on cases after a “careful evaluation of precedential nuances,” but consulting with the defense for a pretrial settlement was never mentioned as a part of Marshall’s strategy.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 68%
  2. B 3%
  3. C 14%
  4. D 12%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • Why A? 0 replies

    Started by Nishant-Varma

  • Why not A? 2 replies

    Started by Ryan-Scirocco

  • Mental functions 2 replies

    Started by RKHanda13