Reading comp PrepTest 125 · Section 3 · Question 1

Passage

Questions 1-7  .        Most of what has been written about Thurgood  . Marshall, a former United States Supreme Court Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Current focus of scholarship and author’s interest in Marshall’s strategy/methodology
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Traditional scholarship on Marshall:
      • Marshall’s time as Supreme Court Justice
    • Author’s focus:
      • Marshall’s technical legacy — how his work with the NAACP was strategically/methodologically innovative
      • Marshall’s innovation — how he predetermined and carefully crafted/coordinated legal strategy
    • Author’s attitude: “reveals a strategic and methodological legacy” (lines 9-10); “forever changed the landscape of public interest law” (lines 14-15); “meticulously crafted and carefully coordinated” (lines 19-20)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • One aspect of Marshall’s innovative strategy (the test case strategy)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 1: Test case strategy — picking cases that have a good chance of changing law and feature sympathetic litigants
    • Author’s attitude: “careful evaluation” (line 23); “essential element” (line 27); “carefully selected” (line 31)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Another aspect of Marshall’s innovation (use of sociological and psychological stats) and criticism of it
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of Marshall's innovations:
      • Item 2: Sociological and psychological stats to show public harms in violation of constitutional principles
    • Example of stats Marshall used:
      • The harm of segregation
    • Criticism of Marshall’s use of stats:
      • Gives judges non-legal reasons to reach fuzzy legal decisions

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Marshall’s legacy on public interest law
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author’s view:
      • Public interest firms have increased and used these strategies
      • The legacy is somewhat unexpected, since Marshall’s strategy is used for both consumer advocacy and conservative purposes
      • But Marshall’s strategies are the norm today
    • Author’s attitude: “grown substantially” (line 48); “widely adopted” (lines 48-49); “might seem surprising” (line 57); “have become the norm” (line 61)

Main Point: Focusing on Thurgood Marshall’s work with the NAACP highlights innovative strategies he developed in the field of public interest law that have become standard in that practice today.

Key Lines?

Lines 17-20 - Marshall’s innovation

Lines 21-25, 30-32 - One aspect of the innovation

Lines 34-35 - Another aspect of the innovation

Lines 40-42 - A criticism of this second aspect

Lines 57-59 - A surprising aspect of his legacy

Lines 61-62 - His legacy

Meta-Structure?

Innovative Subject: While much more common in Humanities passages, a discussion of a subject’s innovation is one of the most common Meta-Structures in the RC section. Here, the passage focuses explicitly on innovations spearheaded by Marshall and the NAACP in the public interest space. The innovation is described in Lines 17-20, two aspects are then explored through Paragraphs 2 and 3, and the legacy of these innovations (including a surprising one) is discussed in Paragraph 4. When a passage falls into the Innovative Subject Meta-Structure, the main point focuses on that innovation, as reflected in our main point above.

Examples: The passage provides a couple of examples in a few places. First, the author discusses examples of the type of sociological and psychological statistics used by Marshall in his innovative strategy (Lines 35-37). Later, the author presents examples of groups that have used this strategy in more recent times (Lines 51-54). Both of these are fairly limited in scope and back up minor points made by the author, so we should expect a question or two on them, but they won’t be a major focus of the questions.

Last Thoughts?

One element that has a solid chance of being the feature of a question is the “surprising” use of Marshall’s strategy by conservative public interest lawyers. When an author notes that something is surprising or unexpected, it almost always gets asked about, so be sure to note such features when they show up!

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Reiterate the main point as we summarized it after reading through the passage, then find the answer that best matches with it

Answer Anticipation

As discussed in the Meta-Structure section above, this passage utilizes an Innovative Subject Meta-Structure. In such a Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author’s opinion on the innovative subject. So the main point is:“Focusing on Thurgood Marshall’s work with the NAACP highlights innovative strategies he developed in the field of public interest law that have become standard in that practice today.”Let’s look for an answer choice that embodies these ideas.

Answer choices

  1. A
    In his role as Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not quite, but this is a very tempting answer! Marshall did work with the NAACP to develop strategies that were effective in arguing against state-sanctioned racial segregation. And it’s fair to call some of the strategies controversial, based on the criticism that they were considered to be a “radical departure” from accepted conventions.

    However, this answer falls just short of reflecting the main point of the passage in limiting the discussion to the success of Marshall’s strategies rather than their legacy. In Paragraph 1, the author talks about how these innovative strategies left a “legacy” that “forever changed” public interest law. And the author ends the passage by talking about how Marshall’s strategies have “become the norm” for public interest litigation. In failing to mention this legacy, the answer misses the main point of the passage.

  2. B
    The litigation strategies that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this answer choice contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Yes! This answer mentions the innovative strategies developed by Thurgood Marshall during his time at the NAACP and their long-standing legacy. In addressing both the innovations and the legacy of Marshall, this answer captures all important elements of the author’s argument, making it the correct answer. We would be justified in selecting (B) and advancing to the next question.

  3. C
    Although commentary on Marshall Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not quite. The author does say that a shift in focus can be helpful in evaluating Marshall’s career. However, the shift the author recommends is a shift away from Marshall’s time as a judge and the ideological focus of his time as a lawyer to the technical aspects of his time as a litigator/director at the NAACP. The author doesn’t recommend a reevaluation of his time as a judge, as this answer states.

  4. D
    In his work with Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not exactly, but this answer is another very tempting trap answer! However, it goes wrong in one key way. The main point of the passage — and the Meta-Structure defining it — is that Marshall’s strategies were innovative. In other words, they hadn’t been done before. This answer treats them as if the tactics he adopted were previously used, and he “adapted” them in a way that allowed them to become accepted conventions. That’s not quite right. He didn’t adopt someone else’s radical tactics and make them acceptable. He developed these tactics that others considered a “radical departure from accepted conventions” when he used them.

  5. E
    Contrary to the impression Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice contain the same ideas as our anticipated main point?

    Not quite. The author does focus on Marshall’s “strategic and methodological legacy” to the field of public interest law, but the author never states that this is more impactful than his legacy as a Supreme Court Justice.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 7%
  2. B Credited 73%
  3. C 3%
  4. D 13%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion