Reading comp PrepTest 113 · Section 1 · Question 20

Passage

Questions 14-21  .        Published in 1952, Invisible Man featured a  . protagonist whose activities enabled the novel's author,  . Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Two criticisms of Ellison's Invisible Man (too focused on the individual to spur political action, too European)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of two related criticisms of Ellison's Invisible Man:
      • Ellison was too focused on the individual to spur the political activity demanded by his era (last sentence)
      • Ellison was too focused on European fictional techniques to contribute to an African American novelistic style (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Ellison's response (artists shouldn't ignore their individuality to serve a political or cultural purpose)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Ellison's view:
      • Telling artists to ignore their individual identities and unique perspectives to serve a political or cultural goal is demeaning to artists and their audiences (first through last sentences)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Author's on Invisible Man's similarity to jazz (both transform European forms into personal art)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Comparison, according to the author:
      • Both jazz and Invisible Man were influenced by European forms but expanded on these forms, creating art that is personal and expressive (second and last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "may be of more help" (first sentence), "never" (second sentence), "transform ... unique and personal but also expressive of African American culture" (second sentence), "avoided the mere recapitulation" (last sentence), "using his work to explore and express the issues of identity and character" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • More on Invisible Man's similarity to jazz (protagonist's relationship to cultural inheritance parallels jazz solos)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Comparison, according to the author:
      • The Invisible Man's protagonist is isolated but still connected to a European and African American cultural community, which parallels a soloist in jazz's connection to the band's rhythm section (first through last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "rich mode' (first sentence), "proves" (last sentence), "unique voice" (last sentence)

Main Point: Comparing Ellison's Invisible Man to jazz music provides a model to understand Ellison's artistic goals and accomplishments. 

Meta-Structure?

Correcting the Record: We think the Correcting the Record Meta-Structure best fits this passage's structure.* In a Correcting the Record passage, the author describes a common misconception or false belief. Then, the author explains why the beliefs are false and will occasionally offer an alternative belief. That is exactly what the author does in this passage.

In the first paragraph, the author introduces critics who take issue with Ralph Ellison's novel Invisible Man. These critics argue that Ellison was too preoccupied with the individual to be sufficiently political and too focused on European forms to contribute to a uniquely African American novelistic style.

After quoting Ellison's response to these criticisms, the author corrects the record. The author shows that jazz provides a useful model to assess and understand Invisible Man. The author compares Ellison's use and transformation of European novelistic techniques to jazz's use and transformation of European-influenced music to show how both expanded on their source material to create unique and personal art. The author also compares Ellison's protagonist, who is simultaneously alienated and connected to a cultural community, to jazz soloists.

In a Correcting the Record passage, the main point is either an explanation of why the misconception is false or, if the author provides an alternative belief, the author's opinion about that belief. In this passage, the author provides an alternative belief: that comparing Invisible Man to jazz helps us understand Ellison's artistic mission and accomplishments. So, we've summarized the main point as: "Comparing Ellison's Invisible Man to jazz music provides a model to understand Ellison's artistic goals and accomplishments."

*As is the case with many passages that fall into the Critical Meta-Structure family, several different Meta-Structures could work for this passage. You could easily classify it as a Rebutting Critics or Criticizing a Viewpoint passage, as the author both defends Ellison and shows why his critics' views are mistaken. You could even argue that this is an Innovative [Subject] passage. Ultimately, since the author provided a new way of examining Ellison's novel that "may be of more help than those employed by its critics," we thought a Correcting the Record passage best fit this passage's argument. Still, any of these Meta-Structures would provide a helpful understanding of the passage's main point and organization.

Comparison: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the comparison. The author compares Invisible Man to jazz over the course of two paragraphs. We should highlight or note these similarities, as they are bound to figure into several questions.

Last Thoughts?

This passage is organized in a helpful way! The first paragraph is dedicated to the critics' argument. The second features Ellison's response. The last two outline the author's argument. If any question asks about one of these players' views, we'll know where to look to anticipate the answer.

Question prompt

The primary purpose of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the main point and any major Meta-Structures, then find an answer that best captures the latter with the details from the former

Answer Anticipation

A question that asks for a passage's "primary purpose" asks us to select the answer choice that describes why the author wrote the passage. The correct answer will describe an action: what the author hoped to do in the passage and how the author accomplished that.Now, in a broad sense, every author hopes to convince us that the main point is true. However, different authors employ different means to convince us of that main point. That's why the passage's Meta-Structure can be revealing: it helps us predetermine how this specific author was attempting to convey the main point.In this case, the central Meta-Structure was Correcting the Record. Specifically, the author wanted to defend Ellison's Invisible Man against criticisms by showing that comparing the novel to jazz helps us understand Ellison's artistic mission and accomplishments. So, let's look for an answer choice that says something like, "to correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel."

Answer choices

  1. A
    make a case that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this say something like, "correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel"?

    Nope. The author defends Ellison, but the author never says or implies that Ellison ranks among the most important novelists of the twentieth century.

  2. B
    demonstrate the value of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this say something like, "correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel"?

    Not quite. Although the passage does use jazz to help understand a novel, we don't know if our author thinks such a comparison would be valuable with other books. Furthermore, (B) doesn't reference the criticism that the author responds to.

  3. C
    explain the relevance of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this say something like, "correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel"?

    No. We don't know if the author thinks Invisible Man is relevant to "the political and social issues of the time." In fact, there's reason to think that our author agrees with Ellison's resistance against the expectation that his books speak to those topics. Most importantly, (C) again doesn't talk about the criticism that the author responds to or the new framework the author supplies, so it's out.

  4. D
    defend the work of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) Does this say something like, "correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel"?

    Yes! Although this doesn't mention the framework for understanding the novel the author uses to defend Ellison, this is still an accurate restatement of the author's primary purpose. This answer choice accurately describes why the author wrote the passage ("to defend the work of a certain novelist") and the criticism the author corrects ("it should have addressed political and social issues"). So, we can confidently select (D) and move on!

  5. E
    distinguish clearly between the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this say something like, "correct critics' charges against a novel by providing a new framework for understanding the novel"?

    Nope, so we can eliminate (E). Besides, this answer choice is much broader than the author's focus. The author isn't concerned with "art for art's sake" in general or "art for purposes such as political agendas" in general. The author just wants to defend one book.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 3%
  2. B 5%
  3. C 6%
  4. D Credited 85%
  5. E 2%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion