Reading comp PrepTest 101 · Section 1 · Question 7

Passage

Questions 7-13  .        In April 1990 representatives of the Pico Korea  . Union of electronics workers in Buchon City, Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Sciences


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Background on Pico Korea Union (championed by Korean Americans, who were affected by PKU's dispute)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The Pico Korea Union's dispute was supported by an extraordinary collection of Korean-American groups and had a profound effect on the Korean-American community (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "championed" (last sentence); "deeply affected" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • How the PKU’s dispute affected KA community (increased young KAs' interest in politics/culture, expanded KA’s political base)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute affected the Korean-American community, according to the author:
      • Unified a diverse Korean-American community (first sentence)
      • Increased the political awareness of second-generation Korean Americans (second sentence)
      • Promoted second-generation Korean American's interest in their cultural identity (third and fourth sentences)
      • Expanded the political base of the Korean-American community to include recent working-class immigrants, who gave the community a more global perspective on working conditions (fifth and sixth sentences)
      • Created new alliances between the Korean-American community and progressive labor and social justice groups (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "rallying focus for a diverse community often divided" (first sentence); "Most notably" (second sentence); "mobilized" (second sentence); "can help to globalize the perspective" (sixth sentence); "can help to establish international ties on a more personal level" (sixth sentence); "especially warm" (sixth sentence); "as evidenced" (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Why PKU dispute affected KA community (strong human component of PKU's demands)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • The strong human component and a lack of an ideological bent to the Pico Korea Union's demands caused members of the Korean-American community to put aside their differences and focus on the Union's demands for social justice and workers' rights (first and second sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "strong human component" (second sentence); "larger concerns" (second sentence); "unencumbered" (third sentence); "economic exploitation" (last sentence); "underscored the common interests" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Lesson of PKU's dispute (joining labor/social struggle in original country can unify immigrant community)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The Pico Korea Union's visit shows that the most effective way to unify and empower an immigrant community may be joining a fight for economic and social justice in their country of origin (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "offers an important lesson" (first sentence); "need more than just knowledge" (second sentence); "perhaps the most effective means" (last sentence); "may be" (last sentence)

Main Point: The Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages mobilized and unified the diverse Korean-American community against the economic exploitation of these workers and offers an important lesson on how to empower immigrant communities.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Author summarizes how PKU affected KA community

P4, S3 - Author summarizes lesson to take away from PKU's dispute

Meta-Structure?

Importance of Subject: This passage utilizes the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure. In this passage, the author describes why the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and eventual visit to the U.S. was historically significant, particularly in how it impacted the Korean-American community.

When a passage utilizes an Importance of Subject Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's opinions on why the subject is important. The author's has two takes on why the dispute was important, which the author describes at length in the second and fourth paragraphs. The author uses the second paragraph to enumerate the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. mobilized and unified the Korean-American community. The author uses the fourth paragraph to describe what lessons we should take away from the Union's dispute. We summarized both of these points in our anticipated main point.

List: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the list of all the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. affected the Korean-American community. We've listed each effect in the Passage Summary above. Expect this list to figure into at least one of the questions.

Last Thoughts?

This question has a balanced mixed of author’s attitude and minor Meta-Structures. Therefore, we should expect a balanced mix of Major Point, Minor Point, Argument Structure, and Tone questions.

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Strategy Overview

Reiterate the main point as we summarized it after reading through the passage, then find the answer that best matches it

Answer Anticipation

This is a variation of a Main Point question. Instead of asking us to articulate the passage's main point, it's asking us to describe the passage's "main topic." What's the difference between the main point and main topic? The main point will necessarily include the passage's subject and the author's take on that subject. The main topic will need to include the passage's subject, but it doesn't have to include the author's take.Still, we can use the passage's main point to help us anticipate its main topic. As discussed in the Meta-Structure section above, this passage utilizes an Importance of Subject Meta-Structure. In such a passage, the main point is generally the author's opinion on why the subject is important. In this passage, the author has two takes on why the Pico Kore Union's visit was important, which we summaried in our anticipated main point: "The Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages mobilized and unified the diverse Korean-American community against the economic exploitation of these workers and offers an important lesson on how to empower immigrant communities."Now, we just have to take the opinion-y parts out of that main point. We can take out tonal words like "mobilized," "exploitation," and "important lesson." We're left with the "Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages" and its effect on "the Korean-American community." Let's look for these ideas in the answer choices.

Answer choices

  1. A
    the contribution of the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice say the main topic is the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and its effect on the Korean-American community?

    Nope. This gets the cause-and-effect backward. The topic is how the Pico Korea Union changed the Korean-American community, not how the Korean-American community changed the Pico Korea Union.

  2. B
    the change brought about Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice say the main topic is the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and its effect on the Korean-American community?

    This is close! But the phrase "contacts with Koreans visiting the United States" is a little off. Although the Pico Korea Union eventually visited the U.S., this answer choice makes it sound like Korean Americans happened to run into Korean tourists visiting the U.S. or something like that. It also doesn't specify that the passage was about just one visit in 1990. This makes it sound like Korean visitors may have changed the Korean-American community over many years or even decades!

    Since (B) doesn't specify that change resulted from one visit concerning a labor dispute between a union and the parent company of the union members' employers, we probably shouldn't select (B) until we've read all the answer choices. We can keep it as a contender, but we should see if anything else more closely matches our anticipation.

    Ultimately, we'll find an answer choice that is a closer match to our anticipation. The issues identified above are enough to make (B) the wrong answer.

  3. C
    the contribution of recent Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice say the main topic is the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and its effect on the Korean-American community?

    No. This gets the cause wrong. The passage wasn't about how Korean immigrants changed the Korean-American community. It was about how joining a Korean's union's dispute changed the Korean-American community. Sure, one of those changes involved expanding the Korean-American community's political base to include recent working-class immigrants (P2, S5). Still, joining the union's dispute caused this change (and others).

  4. D
    the effects on the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) Does this answer choice say the main topic is the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and its effect on the Korean-American community?

    Yes, this gets quite close to our anticipation! (Ultimately, it's much closer to our anticipation than (B) or any other answer choice.) Some test-takers may wonder if the dispute was between Korean union workers and a "United States company," but a quick review of the first paragraph will show that a U.S. company owned these Korean union worker's employer (P1, S1). So, that part of (D) checks out. We can select it and advance to the next question.

  5. E
    the effect of the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice say the main topic is the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and its effect on the Korean-American community?

    Nope. This answer choice mistakes an effect for a cause. The passage focuses on how joining a fight over unpaid wages caused changes within the Korean-American community. One of the effects was the politicization of second-generation Korean Americans. This answer choice, however, makes it seem like the passage focused on the changes caused by the politicization of second-generation Korean Americans. That's not true, so (E) is wrong.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 9%
  2. B 7%
  3. C 12%
  4. D Credited 65%
  5. E 7%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.