Reading comp PrepTest 101 · Section 1 · Question 13
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Social Sciences
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Background on Pico Korea Union (championed by Korean Americans, who were affected by PKU's dispute)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Author's view:
- The Pico Korea Union's dispute was supported by an extraordinary collection of Korean-American groups and had a profound effect on the Korean-American community (last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "championed" (last sentence); "deeply affected" (last sentence)
- Author's view:
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- How the PKU’s dispute affected KA community (increased young KAs' interest in politics/culture, expanded KA’s political base)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- List of ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute affected the Korean-American community, according to the author:
- Unified a diverse Korean-American community (first sentence)
- Increased the political awareness of second-generation Korean Americans (second sentence)
- Promoted second-generation Korean American's interest in their cultural identity (third and fourth sentences)
- Expanded the political base of the Korean-American community to include recent working-class immigrants, who gave the community a more global perspective on working conditions (fifth and sixth sentences)
- Created new alliances between the Korean-American community and progressive labor and social justice groups (last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "rallying focus for a diverse community often divided" (first sentence); "Most notably" (second sentence); "mobilized" (second sentence); "can help to globalize the perspective" (sixth sentence); "can help to establish international ties on a more personal level" (sixth sentence); "especially warm" (sixth sentence); "as evidenced" (last sentence)
- List of ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute affected the Korean-American community, according to the author:
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Why PKU dispute affected KA community (strong human component of PKU's demands)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
- The strong human component and a lack of an ideological bent to the Pico Korea Union's demands caused members of the Korean-American community to put aside their differences and focus on the Union's demands for social justice and workers' rights (first and second sentences)
- Author's attitude: "strong human component" (second sentence); "larger concerns" (second sentence); "unencumbered" (third sentence); "economic exploitation" (last sentence); "underscored the common interests" (last sentence)
- Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
Paragraph 4
- Paragraph note
- Lesson of PKU's dispute (joining labor/social struggle in original country can unify immigrant community)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Author's view:
- The Pico Korea Union's visit shows that the most effective way to unify and empower an immigrant community may be joining a fight for economic and social justice in their country of origin (first through last sentences)
- Author's attitude: "offers an important lesson" (first sentence); "need more than just knowledge" (second sentence); "perhaps the most effective means" (last sentence); "may be" (last sentence)
- Author's view:
Main Point: The Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages mobilized and unified the diverse Korean-American community against the economic exploitation of these workers and offers an important lesson on how to empower immigrant communities.
Key Lines?Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Author summarizes how PKU affected KA community
P4, S3 - Author summarizes lesson to take away from PKU's dispute
Meta-Structure?Importance of Subject: This passage utilizes the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure. In this passage, the author describes why the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and eventual visit to the U.S. was historically significant, particularly in how it impacted the Korean-American community.
When a passage utilizes an Importance of Subject Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's opinions on why the subject is important. The author's has two takes on why the dispute was important, which the author describes at length in the second and fourth paragraphs. The author uses the second paragraph to enumerate the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. mobilized and unified the Korean-American community. The author uses the fourth paragraph to describe what lessons we should take away from the Union's dispute. We summarized both of these points in our anticipated main point.
List: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the list of all the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. affected the Korean-American community. We've listed each effect in the Passage Summary above. Expect this list to figure into at least one of the questions.
Last Thoughts?This question has a balanced mixed of author’s attitude and minor Meta-Structures. Therefore, we should expect a balanced mix of Major Point, Minor Point, Argument Structure, and Tone questions.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AIt explains why the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
(A) Does this say something like, "it explains why the Pico workers' dispute was able to unify and mobilize the Korean-American community"?
No. Nothing in our note for the third paragraph suggests that the author explains why Pico workers brought their case to the U.S. So, we can eliminate (A) without checking the passage.
If we did need to check the passage, we'd find that the first paragraph implies that the Pico workers brought their case to the U.S. because a U.S. company owned the factory they worked at (P1, S1). So, if there's an explanation of what the Pico workers brought the case to the U.S., it's in the first paragraph.
-
BIt explains how the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) Does this say something like, "it explains why the Pico workers' dispute was able to unify and mobilize the Korean-American community"?
Not quite. Nothing in our note for the third paragraph suggests that the author discusses "other causes that had previously mobilized the Korean American community" or how those causes differed from the Pico workers' dispute. For this reason, we can cross off (B) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't learn about any other causes that had mobilized Korean Americans even if we re-read the entire passage. In fact, the author says that the mobilization in response to the Pico workers' dispute was "unprecedented" (P1, S2), implying that no other cause had ever mobilized the Korean-American community to this extent.
-
CIt explains why the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
(C) Does this say something like, "it explains why the Pico workers' dispute was able to unify and mobilize the Korean-American community"?
Yeah, this gets close to that idea. The author uses the third paragraph to show why the Pico workers were supported by such a broad and diverse coalition of Korean Americans. According to the author, the strong human component and a lack of an ideological bent to the Pico Korea Union's demands caused members of the Korean-American community to put aside their differences and focus on the Union's demands for social justice and workers' rights (P3, S1-2). So, it's accurate to say that the third paragraph explains why the Pico union workers "were accorded such broad support." We can justifiably select (C) and wrap up this passage.
-
DIt explains how other Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) Does this say something like, "it explains why the Pico workers' dispute was able to unify and mobilize the Korean-American community"?
No. Nothing in our note for the third paragraph suggests that the author discusses "other ethnic groups" or how they "profited from the example of the Pico workers." Consequently, we can cross off (D) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't learn about how other groups benefited from the Korean-American example if we re-read the entire passage. The author suggests other groups could benefit from this example, but that discussion is in the fourth paragraph.
-
EIt explains why different Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) Does this say something like, "it explains why the Pico workers' dispute was able to unify and mobilize the Korean-American community"?
No. Quite the opposite, in fact — the author uses the third paragraph to show how different generations of Korean Americans had a unified reaction to the Pico cause. (E) directly contradicts our note for the third paragraph, so we can cross it off.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.