Reading comp PrepTest 101 · Section 1 · Question 12

Passage

Questions 7-13  .        In April 1990 representatives of the Pico Korea  . Union of electronics workers in Buchon City, Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Sciences


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Background on Pico Korea Union (championed by Korean Americans, who were affected by PKU's dispute)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The Pico Korea Union's dispute was supported by an extraordinary collection of Korean-American groups and had a profound effect on the Korean-American community (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "championed" (last sentence); "deeply affected" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • How the PKU’s dispute affected KA community (increased young KAs' interest in politics/culture, expanded KA’s political base)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute affected the Korean-American community, according to the author:
      • Unified a diverse Korean-American community (first sentence)
      • Increased the political awareness of second-generation Korean Americans (second sentence)
      • Promoted second-generation Korean American's interest in their cultural identity (third and fourth sentences)
      • Expanded the political base of the Korean-American community to include recent working-class immigrants, who gave the community a more global perspective on working conditions (fifth and sixth sentences)
      • Created new alliances between the Korean-American community and progressive labor and social justice groups (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "rallying focus for a diverse community often divided" (first sentence); "Most notably" (second sentence); "mobilized" (second sentence); "can help to globalize the perspective" (sixth sentence); "can help to establish international ties on a more personal level" (sixth sentence); "especially warm" (sixth sentence); "as evidenced" (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Why PKU dispute affected KA community (strong human component of PKU's demands)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • The strong human component and a lack of an ideological bent to the Pico Korea Union's demands caused members of the Korean-American community to put aside their differences and focus on the Union's demands for social justice and workers' rights (first and second sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "strong human component" (second sentence); "larger concerns" (second sentence); "unencumbered" (third sentence); "economic exploitation" (last sentence); "underscored the common interests" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Lesson of PKU's dispute (joining labor/social struggle in original country can unify immigrant community)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The Pico Korea Union's visit shows that the most effective way to unify and empower an immigrant community may be joining a fight for economic and social justice in their country of origin (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "offers an important lesson" (first sentence); "need more than just knowledge" (second sentence); "perhaps the most effective means" (last sentence); "may be" (last sentence)

Main Point: The Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages mobilized and unified the diverse Korean-American community against the economic exploitation of these workers and offers an important lesson on how to empower immigrant communities.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Author summarizes how PKU affected KA community

P4, S3 - Author summarizes lesson to take away from PKU's dispute

Meta-Structure?

Importance of Subject: This passage utilizes the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure. In this passage, the author describes why the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and eventual visit to the U.S. was historically significant, particularly in how it impacted the Korean-American community.

When a passage utilizes an Importance of Subject Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's opinions on why the subject is important. The author's has two takes on why the dispute was important, which the author describes at length in the second and fourth paragraphs. The author uses the second paragraph to enumerate the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. mobilized and unified the Korean-American community. The author uses the fourth paragraph to describe what lessons we should take away from the Union's dispute. We summarized both of these points in our anticipated main point.

List: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the list of all the ways the Pico Korea Union's dispute and eventual visit to the U.S. affected the Korean-American community. We've listed each effect in the Passage Summary above. Expect this list to figure into at least one of the questions.

Last Thoughts?

This question has a balanced mixed of author’s attitude and minor Meta-Structures. Therefore, we should expect a balanced mix of Major Point, Minor Point, Argument Structure, and Tone questions.

Question prompt

The primary purpose of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Strategy Overview

Review the main point and any major Meta-Structures, then find an answer that best captures the latter with the details from the former

Answer Anticipation

A question that asks for a passage's "primary purpose" asks us to select the answer choice that describes why the author wrote the passage. The correct answer will describe an action: what the author hoped to do in the passage and how the author accomplished that.Now, in a broad sense, every author hopes to convince us that the main point is true. However, different authors employ different means to convince us of that main point. That's why the passage's Meta-Structure can be revealing: it helps us predetermine how this specific author was attempting to convey the main point.In this case, the central Meta-Structure was Importance of Subject. Specifically, the author describes why the Pico Korea Union's dispute over unpaid wages and their eventual visit to the U.S. was historically significant, particularly in how it impacted the Korean-American community. The author uses the union’s dispute to make two points about the dispute’s importance. The author says the Pico Korea Union's dispute mobilized and unified the Korean-American community and offers an important lesson on empowering immigrant communities.So, the correct answer choice should say something like "to argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities." Let's look for that.

Answer choices

  1. A
    describe recent developments in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this say something like, "argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities"?

    No. The passage doesn't get into how changes in the Korean-American community affected "other ethnic communities of immigrant derivation." So, (A) misdescribes why the author wrote the passage.

  2. B
    describe a situation in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this say something like, "argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities"?

    This gets pretty close to that anticipation! Indeed, this passage describes a "situation in the Korean American community" (how it changed following its participation in the Pico workers' labor dispute) and argues that this situation "presents a model for the empowerment of ethnic communities of immigrant derivation" (arguing that participating in a labor/social struggle in the community's original country can unify and empower the community). (B) matches the general idea we anticipated and conforms to the argument the author made in the passage. We can select it and advance straight to the next question.

  3. C
    detail the problems faced Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this say something like, "argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities"?

    No — this sounds like a Problem/Solution passage. The passage didn't dwell on the "problems faced by" the Korean-American community. The only problems discussed in the passage were among the Pico workers from Korea. So, (C) mischaracterizes why the author wrote this passage.

  4. D
    argue against economic and Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this say something like, "argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities"?

    No. The author seems to sympathize with the Pico workers' struggle, but the author didn't write this passage to criticize the economic and social injustices in Korea or anywhere else. The author uses the Pico workers' struggle to discuss how an immigrant community's engagement with such a struggle can empower the community and connect members to their cultural roots.

  5. E
    assess the impact of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this say something like, "argue that a labor dispute was important because it transformed an immigrant community and offers a lesson on empowering other immigrant communities"?

    Not quite. This makes it seem like the passage is about the "unionization movement" in general. The passage, however, only discusses one union's struggle. For this reason, (E) mischaracterizes the author's argument.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 5%
  2. B Credited 79%
  3. C 3%
  4. D 1%
  5. E 12%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • Answer E 4 replies

    Started by Hunter

  • Help 2 replies

    Started by Batman