PrepTest 158

[lcid:3728] Prep Test 158 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1 Reading comp

Passage

 A major problem facing industrial societies is their exponentially increasing production of toxic waste. Environmental regulations and expenses for landfills Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary Topic:
Science

Paragraph 1
  • Paragraph note
    • Background to Problem: Deep-well injection of waste
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Background info on deep-well injection: Drill hole into rock layer already filled with salt water, inject waste into salt water, typically between 300 and 1800 meters underground (fourth through seventh sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "major problem" (first sentence), "serious problems" (last sentence)
Paragraph 2
  • Paragraph note
    • Two problems with injection: leaks and human errors
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of potential issues, item 1: leak due to mechanical failure (second sentence)
    • List of potential issues, item 2: leak due to human error (third sentence)
    • Example of leak due to human error: a gap in a 500-meter deep well (fourth and fifth sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "best conditions" (first sentence), "significant amount of noxious chemicals" (second sentence), "dangerous levels of water materials for long periods of time before the problem is even discovered" (last sentence)
Paragraph 3
  • Paragraph note
    • Third problem with injection: unpredictable water flow
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of potential issues, item 3: unpredictable water flow (first sentence)
    • Comparison: surface water vs. underground water (second sentence)
      • Surface water's flow only affected by gravity, underground water's flow is influenced by other factors, like pressure gradients
    • Author's attitude: "nearly impossible" (first sentence)
Paragraph 4
  • Paragraph note
    • Author's conclusion
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's conclusion: "The significant uncertainty about where injected wastes will flow, along with the possibilities of mechanical failure and human error, makes deep-well injection a risky means of managing hazardous wastes" (first sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "significant uncertainty" (first sentence), "possibilities of mechanical failure and human error" (first sentence), "risky means of managing hazardous wastes" (first sentence), "Unfortunately" (second sentence)


Main Point:
The increasing use of deep-well injection of hazardous waste presents a risk of severe water contamination due to mechanical failure, human error, and significant uncertainty about where the injected waste will flow.

Key Lines?
Paragraph 1, Sentence 3 (P1, S3) - Problem introduced
P1, S4-6: How deep-well drilling works
P1, S8 - Controversy surrounding problem described
P4, S1 - Author's conclusion

Meta-Structure?
Problem/Solution: The author identifies a problem in the first paragraph, suggesting that this passage utilizes a Problem/Solution Meta-Structure. In the first paragraph, the author defines the problem: industries increasingly use deep-well injection to dispose of hazardous waste (P1, S3). The author also describes the ensuing controversy: people reliant on underground water sources aren't cool with toxic waste being pumped near their drinking water (P1, S8). However, the author doesn't really provide any solutions in this passage. The author uses the second and third paragraphs to describe why deep-well injection is a worrisome problem. The author then recaps their position in the final paragraph. So, this is less a Problem/Solution passage than just a Problem passage. As such, the main point will be the author's opinion on the problem, which is conveniently summarized by the final paragraph. That paragraph asserts that the increasing use of deep-well injection of hazardous waste presents a risk of severe water contamination due to mechanical failure, human error, and significant uncertainty about where the injected waste will flow.

List: This passage is also organized around a list. Lists are sometimes hard to identify in Reading Comp. However, claims like "there are three serious problems with this method of waste disposal" (P1, S9) provide a strong hint that we're about to get a list of three items. The first two items are enumerated in the second paragraph — the wells may leak due to mechanical failure (P2, S2) or human error (P2, S3-S4). The third item is described in the third paragraph: water flows unpredictably underground, which increases the risk of extensive but unknown contamination (P3, S1-3). When the author organizes part of the passage around items on a list, we'll probably get at least one question about the list. Therefore, it's a good idea to note, remember, or highlight where each item was discussed in each paragraph.

Last Thoughts?
This is a tremendously detail-oriented passage. The first paragraph — the longest — describes deep-well injection in a manner that is ... excuse the pun ... very in-depth. The following two paragraphs enumerate, in detail, three reasons why the author thinks deep-well injection is problematic. Even the author's main point — offered in the last paragraph — just reiterates each item in that list. This passage drills us with details, so we should expect a higher-than-normal amount of Minor Point questions.

Question prompt

Based on the passage, Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Answer choices

  1. A
    At 300 meters or Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    We are looking for an answer choice that describes this arrangement, in order from top to bottom: (1) Surface; (2) (300 meters); (3) Impermeable rock; (4) WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water; (5) (1,800 meters). This answer choice is hard to follow, but does it describe that?

    Let's break it down. This answer choice says it should be 300 meters or more beneath the surface, so elements (1) and (2) are met. It then says there's a layer of impermeable rock "below which there are no permeable layers." This mixes up elements (3) and (4). We know element (4), permeable rock, is beneath element (3), impermeable rock. So, there does have to be a permeable rock layer beneath the impermeable layer.
  2. B
    At 300 meters or Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem
    Question Type:
    Minor Point/Must Be True

    Strategy Overview:
    Refer to notes or what you highlighted/underlined to locate where the passage discusses the "ideal" characteristics for an underground area suitable for deep-well injection, and refer to the relevant part of the passage as needed to find that answer choice that must be true

    Answer Anticipation:
    This is the fourth consecutive question that asks us to identify a specific piece of information. However, this time, the question stem asks us to find which answer choice "most accurately describes" the ideal characteristics of an underground area suitable for deep-well injection. When the question stem uses modifiers like "most likely" or "most accurately," the answer probably won't restate something from the passage. Instead, answering the question will likely require us to draw a connection between a few different pieces of information.

    Like Questions 4, 5, and 6, this is asking a very general question about deep-well drilling. So, part of the correct answer is likely to come from the first paragraph since that provides the most background information. In the fourth through sixth sentences, the author explains that wells are drilled into “permeable rock strata that are already saturated with salt water" located "at least 300 meters" deep, so they're beneath “any aquifers that contain drinkable water (P1, S4-6).

    While we're reviewing the first paragraph, we might notice the reference to "the best conditions" at the beginning of the second paragraph. This should remind us of the "ideal conditions" brought up by the question stem. This sentence tells us that the best conditions involve injecting waste into rock strata that are "separated by impermeable rock strata from aquifers containing drinkable water (P2, S1). We know these aquifers are above 300 meters, so the ideal conditions of an underground area would be rock strata with salt water, located 300 meters or more beneath the surface, with a tight seal of rocks in between the salt water strata below and any drinkable water aquifer above. The first paragraph also clarifies that the permeable rock strata with salt water shouldn't be more than 1,800 meters deep, since drilling that far would be too expensive (P1, S7). In other words, we're looking for:

    ——Surface——
    Possible aquifers
    (300 meters)
    Impermeable rock
    [WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water]
    (1,800 meters)

    Answer Choice Explanation:
    We are looking for an answer choice that describes this arrangement, in order from top to bottom: (1) Surface; (2) (300 meters); (3) Impermeable rock; (4) WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water; (5) (1,800 meters). This answer choice is hard to follow, but does it describe that?

    Let's break it down. This answer choice says the site should be 300 meters or more beneath the surface, so it satisfies elements (1) and (2). It also says the well should be in a layer of permeable rock. This satisfies element (4). And it says there should be a layer of impermeable above the layer of permeable rock, so element (3) is also met. This answer choice doesn't specify that the site should be no deeper than 1,800 meters, but the description is otherwise spot on. Therefore, this is the correct answer.

    Key Takeaway:
    The passage didn't make it very easy to understand where the ideal site for deep-well injection is relative to permeable and impermeable rock strata, drinkable and salt water, and 300 and 1,800 meters. And the answer choices certainly weren't easy to understand. When the language gets tricky, we must have as clear an anticipation as possible. Actually drawing a quick diagram, as we did in the Answer Anticipation above, can only help you make sense of the answer choices.
  3. C
    The area contains one Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    We are looking for an answer choice that describes this arrangement, in order from top to bottom: (1) Surface; (2) (300 meters); (3) Impermeable rock; (4) WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water; (5) (1,800 meters). Does this answer choice describe that?

    Nope. This answer choice says that the area is well will contain rock strata that extend from the surface to a depth of 300 meters. So, this doesn't satisfy element (2) — we know the well will need to be lower than 300 meters. It also doesn't satisfy element (4), as we know the site will need to contain permeable — not impermeable rock strata. These issues make (C) incorrect.
  4. D
    At a depth of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    We are looking for an answer choice that describes this arrangement, in order from top to bottom: (1) Surface; (2) (300 meters); (3) Impermeable rock; (4) WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water; (5) (1,800 meters). Does this answer choice describe that?

    No. This answer choice says the site is less than 300 meters deep, violating element (2). According to the passage, the well will need to be lower than 300 meters so the waste won't touch any aquifers.
  5. E
    The area contains a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    We are looking for an answer choice that describes this arrangement, in order from top to bottom: (1) Surface; (2) (300 meters); (3) Impermeable rock; (4) WELL: Permeable rock strata with salt water; (5) (1,800 meters). Does this answer choice describe that?

    Not at all. This answer choice says the site will be more than 1,800 meters deep, violating element (5). The passage states that the well should be less than 1,800 meters deep. Therefore, this answer choice is incorrect.

What this tests

Discussion