PrepTest 155
[lcid:3718] Prep Test 155 LSAT — Reading Comp — S3
Reading comp
Passage
This passage was adapted from an article published in 2000. Competition to make computer chips smaller and, consequently, faster
Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary Topic:
Science
Paragraph 1
Main Point:
Hu and Belcher's promising research into using peptides to bind to computer-chip materials might allow scientists to work around the current theoretical minimum size of computer chips.
Key Lines?
Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Problem introduced
P2, S3 - Possible solution
P3, S2-4 - Author's evaluation of the solution
Meta-Structure?
Problem/Solution: This passage best fits the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure*. The author describes a problem contemporary — well, actually, 2000s-era — technologists face: how to make computer chips smaller than the laws of physics will allow. The rest of the passage focuses on one potential solution: Belcher and Hu's use of organic compounds known as peptides to bind together computer chip materials.
In a Problem/Solution passage, the author's opinion of the proposed solution is the passage's main point. The author provides their opinion in the last paragraph. The author notes that Belcher and Hu haven't cracked the code yet, but they're making promising advancements. So, we've summarized the main point as, "Hu and Belcher's promising research into using peptides to bind to computer-chip materials might allow scientists to work around the current theoretical minimum size of computer chips."
*Some may see this as an Innovative Subject passage, since Belcher and Hu utilize such a unique approach. If this understanding of the passage makes more sense to you, that's a-OK! The Meta-Structures are here to help us think about a passage's overarching structure and ideas. We don't have to agree on which Meta-Structure a passage has to realize the benefits of the Meta-Structures.
Last Thoughts?
It's important to note, from the last paragraph, that Hu and Belcher haven't solved the problem yet — they're still working on it! The first line of the last paragraph lets us know that they haven't yet been able to assemble a circuit using peptides.
Science
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Problem (making computer chips smaller) and one possible solution (using peptides)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Definition of "transistor": electronic devices that make up computer chips (third sentence)
- Definition of "peptide": amino acid that makes molecular patterns (last sentence)
- Cause-and-effect relationships:
- Competition to make computer chips smaller has caused technologies to advance and economies to grow (first sentence)
- Comparisons:
- With current methods, transistors cannot be smaller than 25 nanometers, but living cells can make complex structures smaller (fourth setnece)
- Most research into making computer chips smaller involves using DNA to assemble smaller computer chips, but Hu/Belcher attempt to use peptides/amino acids (last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "revolution" (first sentence); "may be hope" (fourth sentence)
- Paragraph note
- Belcher and Hu's research (developed new peptides to bind to semiconductor materials)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Cause-and-effect relationship:
- A specific peptide causes calcium carbonate to turn into the structure found on abalone shells (second sentence)
- Comparisons:
- If a peptide can grow calcium carbonate into an abalone shell, a similar peptide could direct the growth of semiconductor materials to transistors (third sentence)
- To find more peptides that could attach to semiconductor materials, Belcher and Hu used a process similar to accelerated evolution (last sentence)
- List of semiconductor materials:
- silicon, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide crystals (fifth sentence)
- Author's attitude: "not only ... but also" (sixth sentence); "initially promising" (last sentence)
- Cause-and-effect relationship:
- Paragraph note
- Belcher and Hu's remaining goals (find more peptides that bind) and progress (promising)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Author's view:
- Belcher and Hu are making promising advancements in finding order to use peptides to bind to semiconductor materials (second through last sentence)
- Comparison:
- New peptides that can bind two different crystals function similarly to a glue (fourth sentence)
- Author's attitude: "making progress" (second sentence); "ballooned into the hundreds" (third sentence); "will take that kind of finesse" (last sentence)
- Author's view:
Main Point:
Hu and Belcher's promising research into using peptides to bind to computer-chip materials might allow scientists to work around the current theoretical minimum size of computer chips.
Key Lines?
Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Problem introduced
P2, S3 - Possible solution
P3, S2-4 - Author's evaluation of the solution
Meta-Structure?
Problem/Solution: This passage best fits the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure*. The author describes a problem contemporary — well, actually, 2000s-era — technologists face: how to make computer chips smaller than the laws of physics will allow. The rest of the passage focuses on one potential solution: Belcher and Hu's use of organic compounds known as peptides to bind together computer chip materials.
In a Problem/Solution passage, the author's opinion of the proposed solution is the passage's main point. The author provides their opinion in the last paragraph. The author notes that Belcher and Hu haven't cracked the code yet, but they're making promising advancements. So, we've summarized the main point as, "Hu and Belcher's promising research into using peptides to bind to computer-chip materials might allow scientists to work around the current theoretical minimum size of computer chips."
*Some may see this as an Innovative Subject passage, since Belcher and Hu utilize such a unique approach. If this understanding of the passage makes more sense to you, that's a-OK! The Meta-Structures are here to help us think about a passage's overarching structure and ideas. We don't have to agree on which Meta-Structure a passage has to realize the benefits of the Meta-Structures.
Last Thoughts?
It's important to note, from the last paragraph, that Hu and Belcher haven't solved the problem yet — they're still working on it! The first line of the last paragraph lets us know that they haven't yet been able to assemble a circuit using peptides.
Question prompt
Which one of the
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Science
Answer choices
-
AAlthough preliminary results suggest Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Does this answer choice include the same ideas as our anticipation?
Nope. This answer is too negative, stating that the research is "unlikely" to lead to a workable solution. As the passage notes, Hu and Belcher are "making progress" still (P4, S2). -
BAdvances in computer chip Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Does this answer choice include the same ideas as our anticipation?
This is a very tempting answer! However, this fails to focus on the research of Belcher and Hu, as the passage does. Instead, this answer choice says that they're just one of many researchers working on the project. While this is true, the passage's point is that their research is promising, not that it's just one of many potential solutions. This answer also doesn't address that there has been some success in their research. -
CBelcher and Hu's research Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
Question Type:
Major Point/Main Point
Strategy Overview:
Reiterate the main point as we summarized it after reading through the passage, then find the answer that best matches it
Answer Anticipation:
As discussed in the Meta-Structure section above, this passage utilizes a Problem/Solution Meta-Structure. In such a Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's opinion on the solution. The author summarized this opinion in the last paragraph. So, the main point is: "Hu and Belcher's promising research into using peptides to bind to computer-chip materials might allow scientists to work around the current theoretical minimum size of computer chips.." Let's find an answer choice that includes these ideas.
Answer Choice Explanation:
Does this answer choice include the same ideas as our anticipation?
Yes! This answer focuses on Belcher and Hu's research, noting that their research shows some promise ("might eventually be applied") at solving the problem identified at the top of the passage. It encapsulates the author's opinion on the passage's central solution, so this is the correct answer. We can justifiably select it and move on to the next question.
Key Takeaway:
Always be sure to pick a Main Point answer that reflects the entirety of the passage and gets the author's tone down. -
DBelcher and Hu's discovery Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Does this answer choice include the same ideas as our anticipation?
No. This answer doesn't mention the problem Belcher and Hu's research is trying to solve, so this answer choice mischaracterizes the passage's overall argument. -
EThe application of Belcher's Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Does this answer choice include the same ideas as our anticipation?
Nope. First, the passage provides no indication that the research into abalones was pure scientific research — Belcher may have wanted to develop some type of material by studying their shells. Second, this answer completely ignores the actual focus of the passage — using peptides to create computer chips.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Why is C correct and B wrong? 3 replies
Started by filozinni