Logical reasoning PrepTest 151 · Section 3 · Question 12
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AThe only paleontologists who Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This argument deals in facts, not beliefs, so this answer about which paleontologists believed something is out of scope. -
BIf the fossil is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise
Stimulus Summary:
A fossil is evidence of X only if it's all from one animal. This fossil is from all over the discover site, so it's not evidence of X.
Answer Anticipation:
A conditional rule is given:
Fossil is evidence → From one animal
The conclusion is that the fossil isn't evidence, so the contrapositive is more useful:
Not from one animal → Fossil isn't evidence
To reach the conclusion, the argument needs to establish that the fossil isn't from one animal. Instead, it establishes that the bones are from all over the discovery site. It's possible the fossil of a single animal ended up spread out in one area, either through predation or natural forces over the millions of years since the dino died.
Answer Explanation:
Here's our answer. The argument establishes that the fossil is a composite. If that's sufficient to mean it's from more than one animal, the conditional in the argument triggers and the conclusion is valid.
Key Takeaway:
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise questions will frequently provide an argument with a conditional rule that isn't triggered. Instead, it will present a piece of information that seems related to the trigger—the correct answer will directly relate the known information to the sufficient condition of the conditional. -
CThere are other fossils Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The conclusion of this argument is about a particular fossil being evidence of a theory, so other pieces of evidence are out of scope. -
DIf the entire fossil Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The argument never discusses well-preserved specimens, so this answer is out of scope. This answer also mentions the entire fossil being from the same animal, which isn't established in the argument (in fact, it's assume that it isn't). -
EThe fossil was stolen Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. It belongs in a museum! The history of this fossil is out of scope to determining if it's from one or more than one dinosaur.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.