Logical reasoning PrepTest 150 · Section 2 · Question 1

Question prompt

Philosopher: I have been Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Errors in Reasoning Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    uses the term "interest" Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The word "interest" is used twice, but there's no indication that the meaning has shifted. In both cases, it appears to mean that they're intellectually curious to hear about the topic.
  2. B
    treats a group as Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Errors in Reasoning

    Stimulus Summary:
    The students who go to a philosophy professor's lectures love philosophy, so therefore most students must have an interest in philosophy.

    Answer Anticipation:
    The philosopher is using her personal experience to extrapolate to all students. That's a sampling flaw if we've ever heard one! Of course the students who go to a philosophy lecture love philosophy, just like people who go to a jazz concert love jazz. Why would someone go to one of those events without already having an interest in them? The sample here is likely to be unrepresentative, and the correct answer will likely reflect that.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer is correct, reflecting the sampling flaw. There is reason to believe that this group is more interested in philosophy than the general population of students—they went to a lecture on philosophy.

    Key Takeaway:
    Whenever an argument generalizes from a subset to a whole group, be sure that there is no reason to believe the subset is unrepresentative of the group. If the subset has made a choice, such as to attend an event, then they're no longer necessarily representative.
  3. C
    appeals to the popularity Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Correct. The argument is about student interest, not the worth of the subject, so this answer doesn't reflect the argument.
  4. D
    takes for granted that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. First, the argument is about whether there is interest in a subject, not whether the interest is increasing. Second, the philosopher does present some evidence that there is interest—the lecture attendance. It may not be conclusive evidence, but it's evidence, nonetheless. This answer reflects an absence of evidence flaw.
  5. E
    takes for granted that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no mention in the argument of whether any interest is good or bad, just whether it exists.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 3%
  2. B Credited 92%
  3. C 2%
  4. D 1%
  5. E 2%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.