Logical reasoning PrepTest 143 · Section 4 · Question 6

Question prompt

Musicologist: Many critics complain Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Main Point Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Handel's da capo arias Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This is the complaint leveled by many critics, so it's not the Musicologist's main point.
  2. B
    Handel's da capo arias Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The debate featured in the stimulus is over whether the extensive text is necessary, not over whether these areas are among the best.
  3. C
    At least one frequent Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Main Point

    Stimulus Summary:
    Some complain about the text in Handel's da capo, but it frees the audience to focus on the music, so it serves a vital function.

    Answer Anticipation:
    This argument starts with a complaint by "[m]any critics" about a piece of music, and when an argument starts with such an attribution, it's almost always an opposing point. This is backed up by the pivot halfway through the argument ("Yet"), and the argument pivots to an opinion on that opposing point—it is refuted by a certain consideration, which is then raised. An opinion on an opposing point is almost always the main point, and the consideration supports that it can be used to refute the opposing point, so the pivot clause is the main point of this argument.

    The correct answer will either directly restate the conclusion—certain criticism of Handel's da capo can be refuted—or it will flesh out that idea with the specifics—the criticism of da capo's extensive text is refuted by the text's vital function.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer paraphrases the conclusion—that the criticism "is refuted," which means that it's not valid criticism and thus is undeserved.

    Key Takeaway:
    When an opening statement in an argument attributes the argument to "some/many" members of a group, that's almost certainly an opposing point. When the argument pivots, it's generally pivoting to the author's argument. When an author states an opinion on the opposing point, that's almost always the conclusion.
  4. D
    At least some of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The author believes that these repetitions serve a "vital function" in the only arias discussed, so this answer isn't even supported let alone the main point.
  5. E
    Most criticism of Handel's Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The Musicologist only addresses one criticism of the arias, not most criticism.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 4%
  2. B 7%
  3. C Credited 73%
  4. D 4%
  5. E 11%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.