Logical reasoning PrepTest 135 · Section 4 · Question 20
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
ATwo pieces of paper Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
The conclusion of the argument is that colored paper is better than paint at teaching about color. Therefore, it’s only necessary that colored paper of the exact same color has a more similar effect than paint in the same context. Additionally, there’s a difference between texture of applied paint being different (it’s a matter of application, which is easier to alter) than of paper being different (it’s a matter of production, and thus more easily reproduced). -
BA slight difference in Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
The argument establishes that colored paper’s color can be exactly reproduced, so the argument doesn’t need to assume anything about paper of slightly different shades. -
CChanging light conditions have Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
The conclusion is that colored paper is better than paint, and that’s based on the reproducibility of the color. If all other things are equal (and reproducibility is a good thing), then the conclusion holds. Therefore, this answer that changing light conditions have less of an effect on color perception for paper than paint is more than necessary for the argument to work - if they were equally affected by light, then the argument could still hold since paper has been established to have another relevant difference that could, on its own, justify the conclusion. -
DObserving the impacts of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
This answer matches our anticipation - that an argument making a recommendation of one option over the other needs a premise establishing how that decision will be made. In this argument, it was never established that reproducibility of the color in order to allow for comparisons between contexts was important. This answer choice establishes that it is. If the ability to compare the impact of a color across contexts doesn’t help art students learn about the use of color, then the comparison made in the stimulus is unrelated to the conclusion. -
EIt is important that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
The point isn’t to teach students how the use of paper and paint is different, but rather about the use of color. The paint/paper is simply a means of conveying color. Therefore, the effects of the materials are out of scope outside of things that impact color..
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Why is the answer D and not E? 1 reply
Started by dkl6bg
-
Answer Choice A 0 replies
Started by Roy
-
HELLO 0 replies
Started by noname