Reading comp PrepTest 131 · Section 4 · Question 19
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Humanities
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Background on Noguchi (deeply original, creative, followed a unique path) and preview of sculpture example
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Author's view:
- Noguchi asked and responded to deeply original questions in his art; he charted a unique path in his career (first and second sentences)
- Comparison, according to the author:
- Noguchi was like a scientist and could have become one (second sentence)
- Example of Noguchi's creativity, according to the author:
- The story behind a sculpture (last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "intuitively asked—and responded to—deeply original questions" (first sentence); "repeatedly veered off at wide angles" (second sentence); "creativeness" (last sentence)
- Author's view:
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Noguchi's background (early promise; Brancusi's stonecutter) and observation (sculptors have only used negative light/shadow)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Comparison, according to Noguchi:
- Sculptors have used negative light (i.e., shadow) because only gold is reliably shiny (last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "exquisite comprehension" (first sentence); "deft conceptual realization" (first sentence); "scientist's mind" (last sentence)
- Comparison, according to Noguchi:
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Noguchi's goal (purely reflective sculpture) and suggested approach (chrome-nickel steel, a permanently reflective surface now available due to Ford)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Noguchi's view:
- Wanted to create a purely reflective, positive-light sculpture (first sentence)
- Comparisons, according to the author/Fuller:
- Like nonoxidizing gold, chrome-nickel steel is permanently reflective; unlike nonoxidizing gold, chrome-nickel steel is cheap and available in mass quantities (third and last sentences)
- Noguchi's view:
Paragraph 4
- Paragraph note
- Description of sculpture ("invisible" surface that is noticed only when other objects change in reflection) and analogy (still waters)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Noguchi's view:
- A positive-light sculpture would be "invisible," seen only when objects surrounding it change (fourth through last sentences)
- Comparison, according to the author/Noguchi:
- The surface of Noguchi's sculpture is like the surface of still water — it is only seen in reflection (second sentence)
- Noguchi's view:
Paragraph 5
- Paragraph note
- After the sculpture (praised but Noguchi moved on)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Author's view
- Even after Noguchi received praise for his discovery, he kept on innovating/evolving (first and last sentence)
- Author's attitude: "stunning discovery" (first sentence); "inquisitive nature" (first sentence); "the genius of his original and fundamental conception" (second sentence); "next phase of his evolution" (second sentence)
- Author's view
Main Point: Noguchi confronted original questions and continually innovated in his sculptures, as is illustrated by a particular reflective sculpture of Fuller.
Meta-Structure?Generalization/Example: Check out the last sentence of the first paragraph. There, we're essentially told that the author is going to use the Generalization/Example Meta-Structure as a central feature of the passage.* The author opens the passage by claiming that Noguchi was innovative throughout his career and then closes out that paragraph by saying that one work exemplifies this general characterization of the sculptor. That example is discussed throughout the rest of the passage (except the last paragraph, but even that's used to reinforce the general point about Noguchi's boundless and restless innovation).
When a passage relies on a Generalization/Example Meta-Structure, the main piont is the author's generalization or a variation of, "[The specific example] illustrates [the generalization]. ") So, we used that template for our anticipated main point.
*That said, other Meta-Structures could apply to this passage. Most obviously, this passage conforms to the Innovative [Subject] Meta-Structure, with the place holder "[Subject]" standing in for "Artist" (Noguchi) or "Sculpture" (Fuller sculpture). We could also think of this as a Problem/Solution passage, where Noguchi looks for a way to rely on positive light in a sculpture (the problem) and eventually lands on chrome-nickel steel (the solution).
Last Thoughts?That fourth paragraph is dense and hard to understand. However, it describes the innovative sculpture, so it's important to have some handle on what it's talking about. The analogy is there to help you wrap your head around it (pun completely intended). From that paragraph, we know that the sculpture is "invisible" in that it can only be seen through the reflections in the metal. And in that way, it's like the surface of a lake - you can't really see that surface, but you can see the trees, sun, and clouds reflected in it to know where it is. Let's keep that image in mind since it's likely more familiar than a portrait of Fuller sculpted out of chrome-nickel steel!
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AA building-materials dealer decides Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
(A) Does this answer choice describe a situation where person A uses something originally created by person B for a different purpose?
No. The building-materials dealer here is closest to Ford, who was the one who marketed the new material. The person praising the material is closest to Fuller, however, who suggested the material to Noguchi (P3, S3). So, this answer is more analogous to the relationship between Fuller and Ford than Ford and Noguchi!
-
BAn expert skier begins Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) Does this answer choice describe a situation where person A uses something originally created by person B for a different purpose?
Nope. The skier here is analogous to Noguchi, as they're experimenting with a new material (P3, S4). However, the shoe manufacturer here takes on the role of Fuller suggesting the material (P3, S3) — we don't know that this manufacturer originally created the new material — so this answer is slightly off. Moreover, using a material created initially for shoes in ski boots isn't that different of a purpose.
-
CA producer of shipping Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
(C) Does this answer choice describe a situation where person A uses something originally created by person B for a different purpose?
The producer of shipping containers started to use a new material here, making them analogous to Ford, who was the one who started using chrome-nickel steel (P3, S3). The rock climber here took that material and used it for a different purpose — much like Noguchi took chrome-nickel steel and used it for sculpture instead of automotive applications (P3, S4). This answer captures the relationship between Noguchi and Ford, so it's the correct answer.
While it's a bit scary to pick the first answer choice that fits our anticipation on an Analogous Situation question, we'd be justified in doing so here.
-
DA consultant to a Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) Does this answer choice describe a situation where person A uses something originally created by person B for a different purpose?
Nope. The book editor — who uses a new product — is analogous to Noguchi (P3, S4). But the consultant who recommends the software is analogous to Fuller, who recommended a new material to Noguchi (P3, S3). So, this answer choice parallels the relationship between Fuller and Noguchi more than Ford and Noguchi. Moreover, Fuller's suggestion didn't inspire Noguchi to use a similar alternative, as this answer choice suggests.
-
EA friend of a Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) Does this answer choice describe a situation where person A uses something originally created by person B for a different purpose?
Nope. This is functionally equivalent to (D). The friend making the recommendation is analogous to Fuller, who recommended a new material to Noguchi (P3, S3). And the landscaper is somewhat analogous to Noguchi, but we don't even know if the landscaper uses the new material!
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Video Explanation 3 replies
Started by maonuo
-
Help about this question needed 7 replies
Started by gursahib1
-
Started by AmyLou