Logical reasoning PrepTest 126 · Section 1 · Question 2
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
APlumper beans enhance the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Necessary Premise
Stimulus Summary:
Presoak beans - Lower cooking time
not Presoak beans - Plumper
Therefore - When quality is more important than speed, not presoak beans
Answer Anticipation:
This argument brings up several points of comparison, but, as always, we should focus on the comparison in the conclusion to see where the gap in the logic is.
The conclusion recommends not presoaking beans in a specific situation—when quality is more important than speed of cooking. The premises establish that not presoaking beans results in a plumper bean. Does that align with the condition on the conclusion—when quality trumps speed of cooking?
Nope! There's no indication that a plump bean is a higher quality bean. The argument is assuming that that is true, so the correct answer should establish that connection.
Answer Explanation:
This answer makes the connection required for the argument to work. If plumper beans don't result in a higher quality dish, then there's no reason to avoid presoaking beans when aiming for a high-quality dish.
Key Takeaway:
Always look for new concepts in the conclusions of Strengthen with Necessary Premise questions. When one is present, the correct answer will likely connect that concept to a concept established in the premises. -
BThere are no dishes Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. The stimulus is about beans, so this answer about all dishes—those with or without beans—is too broad. -
CA dish's appearance is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Appearance is never mentioned in the stimulus, nor is it inherently related to any concepts there, so this answer is out of scope. -
DNone of the other Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Other ingredients are out of scope of the conclusion, which limits itself to recommending that beans shouldn't be presoaked. If the conclusion said something like, "ingredients should not be presoaked," then this answer would be relevant. -
EThe plumper the bean, Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Flavor is, surprisingly, out of scope of this argument. There's no indication that flavor is related to quality. Additionally, even if we say that quality and flavor are inherently related where food is concerned, there doesn't need to be a proportional relationship between plumpness and flavor. It's possible that there's a limit to how plump a bean can get while still maintaining good flavor, or that there's a limit to how good you can make a bean taste and any additional plumpness doesn't affect that taste.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.