Logical reasoning PrepTest 124 · Section 2 · Question 25

Question prompt

Most serious students are Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Must Be True Questions / Quantifiers Questions / Sufficient & Necessary Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Most overworked students are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. Since overworked" is the necessary condition of the conditional, we only know about some overworked students and we'll never be able to draw an inference about most of them based on this set of facts. (Yes, the sufficient condition is about all of the noted group, and the necessary condition is about some of that gro
  2. B
    Some happy students are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Must be True

    Stimulus Summary:
    (1) Serious students—most—Happy students
    (2) Serious students—most—Grad students
    (3) Grad students → Overworked

    Answer Anticipation:
    Must be True question with a mix of quantified and conditional statements? Since there are only three statements, and two of them don't share a term (1 and 3), we'll only need to consider two combinations, so we should make those inferences up front.

    First, can we combine 1 and 2? Yep. We can combine two most statements when they share a first term. It gives us a some inference:
    1+2) Happy students—some—Grad students

    Second, can we combine 2 and 3? Yep. When the sufficient condition of a conditional shows up in a most (or a some) statement, we can draw an inference. However, while most inferences involving quantifiers are some inferences, there's one exception—one combo of a conditional and a most statement leads to a most inference, and this is it. (To walk through it quickly, if there are 100 serious students, at least 51 are grad students, and all 51 of them are overworked, so 51/100 or most serious students are overworked):
    2+3) Serious students—most—Overworked

    Normally, we'd be done. However, we have a new most statement—the combo of 2 and 3. Can that be combined with another statement? Sure—it shares a term with statement 1, and they are two most statements with the same first term, so we can draw a similar inference to the combination of 1 and 2:
    1+2+3) Happy students—some—Overworked

    One of these three will almost certainly be the answer!

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer is the valid combination of all three conditionals, so it's the correct answer!

    Key Takeaway:
    Learn your quantifier inference rules. Love your quantifier inference rules. They're not intuitive, but you can memorize them for a few points on the exam!
  3. C
    All overworked students are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. Similar to (A), we know only about some overworked students, so this answer about all of them is too strong.
  4. D
    Some unhappy students go Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. Happy students are a term in a most statement, and we can't contrapose those, so we can't learn anything about unhappy students. Most serious students being happy does not imply that some serious students are unhappy—quantifier statements are guarantees of a minimum, not a maximum. (E.g., it's true to say that most humans are born on Earth—even though all humans are.)
  5. E
    All serious students are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. We learn only about most serious students, so this answer about all of them is too strong.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 7%
  2. B Credited 79%
  3. C 2%
  4. D 9%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.