Logical reasoning PrepTest 122 · Section 1 · Question 19
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AAlthough filmmakers are entitled Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The Critic's conclusion is about whether people should pay attention to these films, not about whether filmmakers are justified" in making them. -
BEveryone ought to ignore Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Close! However, the Critic's conclusion is that people don't need to pay attention to them, not that everyone should ignore them. This answer is a step past the Critic's conclusion. -
CFreedom of speech sometimes Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. First, the Critic doesn't concede that making these movies is necessary. Second, this answer might justify the Although" portion of the Critic's conclusion, but not the second half of that sentence, which is the main point of the argument. -
DFreedom of speech does Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The Critic concedes (Although") that it does entitle them to do that, so this answer contradicts her view. -
EViews that people are Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen (Principle)
Stimulus Summary:
Phenomenon — Recent documentaries" are inaccurate and filled with conspiracy theories
Filmmakers — Free speech!
Film Critic — Sure, but that doesn't mean people have to watch.
Answer Anticipation:
This question asks us to find a principle that the Critic's commentary conforms to, but the majority of the stimulus doesn't include commentary by the Critic at all! It starts with a discussion of a phenomenon, and then it moves to the view of the filmmakers who are making the documentaries in question. It's not until the final sentence that her commentary begins.
There, she starts with a concession ("Although")—the filmmakers do have the right to make these documentaries. However, she then pivots to her main point—that people don't have to watch them.
She doesn't really offer a premise in support of that, so the correct answer will likely provide a reason to believe it. Something akin to:
Even if someone has the right to express a view, it doesn't mean anyone has to listen.
Yes, that sounds like we're just restating the author's argument in a generic format. That's what Strengthen (Principle) questions are all about!
Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects the Critic's argument/conclusion. She concedes that the filmmakers have a right to make these films ("entitled to express") but argues this doesn't mean that people should pay attention to them ("need not . . . obliged to pay attention"). Her argument conforms to this answer, so it's correct.
Key Takeaway:
Strengthen (Principle) questions have answers that will generally sound like abstract and general rehashes of the argument. Don't shy away from an answer because it sounds repetitive of the stimulus!
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Why just G? 3 replies
Started by shaase