Logical reasoning PrepTest 119 · Section 4 · Question 11
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AA large band of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Strengthen
Stimulus Summary:
Hypothesis - South America's east coast was once attached to Africa's west coast
Answer Anticipation:
This stimulus sets out a theory (continental drift), but it asks about a hypothesis related to that theory. Specifically, the hypothesis that South American used to be attached to Africa.
We're tasked with finding an answer that supports that hypothesis, but there really aren't any premises provided for it. So we can head into the answers looking for anything that connects the two areas. Any similarity between them will serve to support the hypothesis that they were once connected.
Note that we should also anticipate a specific type of trap answer. Since the argument talks about the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa, let's make sure we don't pick an answer that reverses those. While it's not certain that they'll go that route to try to trap us, they have in the past, so we need to be careful.
Answer Explanation:
This answer establishes a similarity between the two regions in question that represents a rare type of rock—meaning that the similarity is unlikely to be a coincidence. As such, this answer strengthens the hypothesis.
Key Takeaway:
Note answers (B) and (D)—they were two answers that are tempting, but they're wrong for the same reason. These types of "paired" answers can be good for double-eliminations, as you'll frequently be presented with two answers that are wrong for the same reasons! Don't be shy about eliminating a second answer for reasons that you've already highlighted for another—there are plenty of examples on the LSAT of two answers being similarly wrong. -
BMany people today living Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. First, there's no indication that people aren't all genetically quite similar to each other! Second, this isn't related to the land—it's related to people. Since no timeline is established for the breakup of the supercontinent, it's possible that it happened before humans evolved. -
CThe climates of western Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Climate isn't related to the land being attached—it has to do with location on the planet more than anything. -
DSome of the oldest Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is similar to (B) in that it deals with people instead of the land, and so there are many other explanations for the similarities other than the land being previously connected. -
ESeveral species of plants Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. This answer doesn't mention that the plants in South America grow on the east coast, so it doesn't support the hypothesis. It also doesn't establish that this is a rarity—maybe most plants resemble each other.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Where does it say all? 1 reply
Started by pir2h
-
Started by Brett-Lindsay
-
Explanation Q34 4 replies
Started by aharris