Logical reasoning PrepTest 113 · Section 4 · Question 18
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AOne of the various Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
There being another theory doesn’t weaken this theory! Just because some people out there believe the Earth is flat doesn’t weaken the argument of those who believe it’s round. (Which it is.) -
BVarious species of animals Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
This answer attacks a part of the potential causal chain - the statement that the cooled climate would have led to the dinosaurs’ demise. The cause brought up in the Comet Theory isn’t specific to dinosaurs - every animal on the planet would have been affected by the dust cloud and changing climate. Physiologically similar animals should have reacted to a cooling of the Earth in a similar manner to the dinosaurs. If they survived this period, then this suggests that the cause of the dinosaurs’ extinction wasn’t something that generally affected the entire planet and was more specific to them. This answer thus undermines the Comet Theory and is correct. -
CIt cannot be determined Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
First, the Comet Theory brings up that it was the cooling climate and not the dust itself that killed off the dinosaurs. Second, even ignoring that, the inability to prove a theory using a specific method doesn’t weaken that theory. It’d be like saying we can’t prove the moon has a lot of dust on it by looking at it with a cell phone camera, and so it’s less likely that it has a lot of dust on it. -
DMany other animal species Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Compare this answer to (B) in order to see why it’s incorrect and that answer is correct. This answer does establish that many animals from the same time period survived, but it doesn’t establish - as (B) does - that those animals were relevantly similar. This doesn’t just make (B) better than this answer, but it makes (B) an answer that weakens the argument and this answer an answer that doesn’t. To use an analogy to highlight it, it’d be like saying humans survive on land, and so removing fish from water and putting them on land can’t be what caused them to die. -
EThe consequences for vegetation Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Even if the consequences aren’t fully understood, they could be understood enough to know that they killed off the dinosaurs.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Scrupulous Terminology 1 reply
Started by ThomasMore
-
Timing Issues 3 replies
Started by JKEMP
-
Diagramming Confusion 1 reply
Started by zelda