Logical reasoning PrepTest 109 · Section 1 · Question 3
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
Awhether the participation of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed/Valid
Question Type:
Point at Issue
Stimulus Summary:
J: Ancient Olympics — Just amateurs. Modern Olympics — Amateurs and pros. Amateurs don't have the resources of the pros and thus can't really compete, so allowing the pros in doesn't line up with the Olympic's goal of fairness.
M: The goal of the Modern Olympics is to highlight the best athletes, so pros should be allowed in.
Answer Anticipation:
Michiko and Juan here have "dueling" conclusions—Juan believes that professionals shouldn't be let into the Olympics (or at least it violates the spirit of fairness of the games). Michiko believes that they should be as letting them in aligns with the goal of the modern Olympics—to highlight the best athletes.
This encapsulates both things you should anticipate when faced with a Point at Issue question that features opposed conclusions—the conclusion itself but also what difference there is between the two that leads them to different conclusions. Here they disagree over the goals of the modern games (fairness vs. highlight the best athletes) and thus reach a different conclusion on the inclusion of pro athletes.
Answer Explanation:
This answer encapsulates the point at issue between them. They disagree over the ideals of the modern Olympics (fairness vs. best athletes) and thus whether pros should be included.
Key Takeaway:
When two speakers in a Point at Issue question have opposed conclusions make sure to figure out what the difference is in their reasoning or premises that leads them to different conclusions. While many correct answers will reflect the conclusions just as many will highlight the difference in their arguments that led to those different conclusions. -
Bwhether both amateur and Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Michiko doesn't discuss the ancient games, so this answer is out of scope of her statement. -
Cwhether the athletes who Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Juan doesn't discuss the quality of the athletes in the games, so this answer is out of scope. -
Dwhether any amateur athletes Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Michiko doesn't discuss the resources available to these different categories of athlete—in fact, she says that the goals of the modern games are "regardless" of their resources. Even Juan says only that amateurs "rarely" have the resources of pros suggesting that he believes some do. -
Ewhether governments sponsor professional Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Government sponsorship is out of scope, as neither speaker mentions it.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Why? 1 reply
Started by Katie10