Logical reasoning PrepTest 103 · Section 1 · Question 22
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
Awhether all planetary systems Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
The argument does bring up large and small planets, but the total amount of matter in the planetary system is related to the size of the planets, the number of planets, and the mass of other bodies in the system. Since most of that is out of scope of the argument, so is this answer. -
Bwhether intelligent species would Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
This could be a tempting answer! However, there are two issues with it. First, we already know that life wouldn’t have survived on Earth if large comets frequently struck the planet. That’s several shifts on top of a statement that addresses this question partially. Second, this answer is about intelligent life surviving a comet strike, whereas the conclusion is about intelligent life forming. Even if a comet took out intelligent life, it still would have already formed. -
Cwhether large comets could Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
The premise leading directly into the conclusion is about the low chances of any (i.e., even a single) large planet from forming, even if a single planet would deflect comets, the chances of that forming are still low. While the chances of two forming would be lower still, since the chances of either situation is low, the argument could still hold together. -
Dhow high the chances Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
This answer brings up the odds of a planetary system being similar to Earth is a key regard - the chances of containing many large comets. We know Earth’s solar system does, as many would have hit Earth without large planets around. If Earth is an outlier in that regard, then low planets may not be necessary for intelligent life to form; if it isn’t and the chances are very high that a planetary system will have many large comets, then those large planets would be necessary and thus the chances they form control the chances that intelligent life can form. -
Ehow likely it is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
The size of Earth isn’t noted as being required for intelligent life, and we know that the chances a planet that can support life will form are high, so this is out of scope.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Started by iHAVE33FLAWSandAcommonLSATflawAINTone
-
Real time no sound 0 replies
Started by Sandra
-
tech problems 1 reply
Started by gmaramara