conclusion

Started by ariella · started 2017-01-10 18:52 · last activity 2017-01-15 19:39 · 1 reply

Why isn't "parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety infor mation" the conclusion?

Replies

  1. Mehran · 2017-01-15 19:39

    @ariella the conclusion here is the first sentence, i.e. "The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to proved explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose." The last sentence is a premise. It is provided to support the conclusion that the toy-labeling law should be changed by pointing out why the labels currently required by law are insufficient. Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.

Sign in to reply.