PrepTest 130
[lcid:3619] Prep Test 130 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Anyone who believes in
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise Questions
Answer choices
-
AAnyone who believes that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer connects the two parts of the premise about Griley. It doesn't connect that premise to the sufficient condition of the conditional premise that would allow the conclusion to be drawn, so it's incorrect. -
BAnyone who believes that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise
Stimulus Summary:
Believe in democracy → High regard for wisdom of masses
Griley: Elitist who thinks pop art is probably bad art
Therefore: Griley not Believe in democracy
Answer Anticipation:
Comparing the conclusion to the premises, we can see that the conditional overlaps with that conclusion, but the shared term is negated. In order to get the premise to line up with the conclusion, we should take the contrapositive:
not High regard for wisdom of masses → not Believe in democracy
So the conclusion about Griley can be reached, as long as Griley is established to lack a high regard for the wisdom of masses. The premise about Griley, however, is just about his feelings towards pop art—that it's unlikely to be good. That concept doesn't perfectly overlap with the sufficient condition that would guarantee the conclusion, though, so we need an answer that will connect those concepts:
Believe popular taste in art is bad → not High regard for wisdom of masses
High regard for wisdom of masses → not Believe popular taste in art is bad
Answer Explanation:
Griley believes that popular artworks are unlikely to be good. This answer guarantees that he doesn't have a high regard for the wisdom of the masses. That triggers the conditional that guarantees the conclusion, so this answer is correct (and it matches our anticipation: Believe popular taste in art is bad → not High regard for wisdom of masses).
Key Takeaway:
When an argument applies a conditional, it needs to ensure that the premises actually establish that the sufficient condition is met. When it doesn't, the correct answer will likely make that connection. -
CIf Griley is not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Griley is an elitist, so this answer choice doesn't apply to him. -
DAnyone who does not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer connects ideas about Griley to regard for mass wisdom, so we should consider it: not High regard for wisdom of the masses → . . . but once we start diagramming it, we can see that it's going to be a reversal/negation of our anticipation. -
EUnless Griley believes in Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is a negation of the conclusion (not Believe in democracy → not High regard for wisdom of masses), so it's incorrect.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Question 4 replies
Started by claire_crites
-
H E L P 3 replies
Started by Maria-Marin
-
Ans Choice C and E 3 replies
Started by ankita96