Help in understanding the argument “flaw”

@bb042745, happy to help! The argument is flawed because it makes an unsupported logical jump from the first sentence to the second sentence. How do we know that the needs of obscure species will go unmet without bald eagles? We don't. The first sentence does not necessarily give us enough information to make that connection. Does that make sense? Please let us know if you have any other questions!

hey question for all - so at first I thought the LSAT FLEX was going to be a good thing for me but as I am working on these questions on computer finding myself writing all sorts of stuff on scratch paper I just realized how in world and I going to do the whole reading comp section and logical reasoning section without being able to write notes on the passages any one have suggestions how did they get through those sections only having computer to work on

@Natasha. You are allowed five pieces of scratch paper for the LSAT flex.