PrepTest 110
[lcid:3537] Prep Test 110 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Professor Chan: The literature
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen Questions
Answer choices
-
AAdvertisements ought to be Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is about how ads should be framed not what lit departments should teach so it doesn't address Wigmore's argument. -
BAny text that is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Wigmore specifically notes that her argument doesn't care if ads are or are not true literary works ("might or might not be") so this answer is out of scope. -
CAll undergraduate students ought Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is about what students should do, not what the lit department should teach, so it doesn't address the conclusion. -
DThe literature department's courses Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed/Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen (Principle)
Stimulus Summary:
PC: Ads are frivolous, so the lit dept. should focus on real literary works and not ads.
PW: Ads have a bad effect on society because people can't tell their real messages. The lit dept. teaches critical reading skills, so they should study ads.
Answer Anticipation:
First off, it's important to note which argument we're strengthening with a principle here. The stem asks about Wigmore's argument—the second one—so let's focus there.
As with all Strengthen (Principle) questions, we should expect the conclusion to draw a judgment that's based on a description of a situation. The principle should justify that judgment based on the details of that situation. It's almost always best to start by focusing on the judgment, and then finding the details that the speaker clearly believes justifies that judgment.
Here, Wigmore's judgment takes the form of a recommendation—the lit department should study ads ("it is the . . . responsibility" backs up "should" because you should do that which is your responsibility to do—it's a part of the definition).
Why? Because focusing on them will allow students to analyze them critically which is important because they have a "powerfully detrimental effect on society."
Putting the judgment and relevant details together we should anticipate a principle that is similar to:
If something has a bad impact on society that can be counteracted by learning to critically analyze it then the lit department should include the study of it.
Answer Explanation:
Wigmore notes that ads do have a detrimental effect on society so this answer applies to them. And it establishes that the lit department should teach students how to analyze these which justifies the conclusion. This answer is therefore correct.
Key Takeaway:
Strengthen (Principle) questions base judgments on details without establishing a principle connecting them. Answers will connect the relevant details to that judgment so start with the conclusion and work backwards. -
EAny professor teaching an Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Wigmore notes that she believes the department should teach something specifically, which suggests that the teachers shouldn't be allowed to teach whatever they want—they should teach how to critically analyze ads, regardless of if they want to.
What this tests
Discussion
-
LSAT Flex Prep Tests 2 replies
Started by delaenajoy