PrepTest 110

[lcid:3536] Prep Test 110 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 19-26  .        When women are persecuted on account of their  . gender, they are likely to be eligible Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Author on U.N. Convention's "refugee" definition (some persecuted women are likely eligible for asylum as a "social group")
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • Women persecuted on account of their gender are likely eligible for asylum as refugees; even though the U.N. definition doesn't mention gender persecution, the "social group" category was meant to cover such cases (first, fourth through last sentences)
    • Definition of a refugee from the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees:
      • Anyone who is persecuted "for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion" (second sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "likely to be eligible" (first sentence), "does not preclude" (fourth sentence), "nor does it reflect an intention" (fourth sentence), "indicates that this category "Rather" (fourth sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Author's support ("social group" is meant as a catch-all phrase)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The original definition of refugee (from the International Refugee Organization) didn't include protection for "social groups," but it was later added (by the United Nations Convention) as a safety net (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "in order to provide a 'safety net'" (second sentence), "fail to fit neatly" (second sentence), "intentionally left the precise boundaries of the social-group category undefined" (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Author's support (UNHCR Handbook and committee member's comments support including women in refugee category)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Definition of "social group" from the U.N. Handbook by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): "group as persons of similar background, habits, or social status" (first sentence)
    • Author's view:
      • The broad definition of "social group" from the UNHCR handbook supports and a UNHCR committee member support classifying women asylum seekers who face persecution under the "social group category"
    • Author's attitude: "is supported by" (first sentence), "expansive interpretation" (third sentence), "is resonant with the intentions of the Convention drafters" (third sentence), "should fall within" (fourth sentence), "states to use" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Author's support (UNHCR committee member's comments will influence the interpretation of laws)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The UNHCR committee member's comments are important in the international community since it will have a strong influence on the interpretation of national laws (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "particularly significant" (first sentence), "likely to exert strong influence" (second sentence), "In particular" (third sentence), "likely to have an impact" (third sentence)

Main Point: Legislative history, supplementary materials, and committee member comments suggest that women facing gender persecution can qualify for asylum as refugees under the social group category.

Meta-Structure?

Question/Answer: This passage doesn't fit neatly within any of the major Meta-Structures, but we think Question/Answer best fits the passage's argument.* That said, the question is implicit: "Should women facing persecution based on their gender qualify for asylum?" The author answers the question in the first sentence with a resounding "Yes." The author spends the rest of the passage supporting that answer, citing the "social group" category of the U.N. Convention, the Convention's legislative history, the U.N. Handbook on refugee status, and U.N. committee members' comments.

In a Question/Answer passage, the author's answer is generally the main point. So, we could just say the main point is "Yeah." But we decided to go with something a little more detailed: "Legislative history, supplementary materials, and committee member comments suggest that women facing gender persecution can qualify for asylum as refugees under the social group category. "

*Because this passage doesn't neatly fit into any Meta-Structures, some test-takers may wonder if this is a Reporting a Viewpoint passage. Classifying the passage this way won't necessarily cause you to misunderstand the passage. As long as you're clear on the "viewpoint" the passage expresses, you should understand the passage's main point and organization. That said, we typically reserve this Meta-Structure for passages in which the author reports someone else's view. Here, the author is clearly the one who argues that women should be eligible for asylum. Notice how many tonal phrases we highlighted. Also, notice how the argument isn't attributed to anyone else. So, while we wouldn't expect any Tone questions in a typical Reporting a Viewpoint passage, we should expect a few in this passage.

Last Thoughts?

Question prompt

The primary purpose of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Review the main point and any major Meta-Structures, then find an answer that best captures the latter with the details from the former

Answer Anticipation

A question that asks for a passage's "primary purpose" asks us to select the answer choice that describes why the author wrote the passage. The correct answer will describe an action: what the author hoped to do in the passage and how the author accomplished that.Now, in a broad sense, every author hopes to convince us that the main point is true. However, different authors employ different means to convince us of that main point. That's why the passage's Meta-Structure can be revealing: it helps us predetermine how this specific author was attempting to convey the main point.In this case, the central Meta-Structure was Question/Answer. The passage is structured to answer an implicit question: "Should women facing persecution based on their gender qualify for asylum?" The author answers the question in the first sentence with a resounding "Yes." The author spends the rest of the passage supporting that answer, citing the "social group" category of the U.N. Convention, the Convention's legislative history, the U.N. Handbook on refugee status, and U.N. committee members' comments. According to the author, all of these support the notion that the term "refugee" should include women facing gender-based persecution.So, let's look for an answer choice that says something like, "to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition.

Answer choices

  1. A
    trace the development of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem

    (A) Does this match the purpose we anticipated (to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition)?

    Not exactly, but let's look a little closer. We described the passage's subject matter as whether women qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition. (A) calls the subject "the definition of an important term." If we take that term to be "refugee" — or, more precisely, the "social-group category" that might apply to women facing gender-based persecution — then (A) is still a good match for our anticipation. The author traces the development of the "social-group category" through the legislative history that led to the creation of the United Nations Convention, the creation of supplementary materials like the UNHCR documents, and the committee members' comments. So, even if (A) doesn't match our anticipation, it matches what the author does in this passage.

    Now, even expert test-takers would look at the rest of the answer choices before selecting (A), given how far off (A) is from our anticipation. But once we can eliminate the remaining choices, we can select (A) more confidently.

  2. B
    interpret the historical circumstances Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this match the purpose we anticipated (to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition)?

    No. The passage doesn't discuss any historical circumstances that led to the creation of the U.N.Convention or Handbook. Plus, the author is much more focused on the definition of "refugee" in these documents than any circumstances surrounding their creation.(B) is out.

  3. C
    resolve two apparently contradictory Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this match the purpose we anticipated (to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition)?

    Nope. We never read about conflicting interpretations. All the interpretations agree that women should count as refugees. We can cross off (C).

  4. D
    suggest an alternative solution Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this match the purpose we anticipated (to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition)?

    Not quite. The passage doesn't have a "much-disputed problem." As far as we are told, everyone agrees that women facing gender persecution should be given asylum as refugees. And the author never provides an "alternative solution" to granting women asylum status. We can eliminate (D).

  5. E
    argue against the current Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this match the purpose we anticipated (to explain why women facing gender-based persecution should qualify for "refugee" status based on the U.N.'s definition)?

    Nope. The author doesn't argue against a current definition. The current definition of "social group" allows for the inclusion of women facing gender persecution, and the author seems to agree with that! (E) is out.

What this tests

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.