PrepTest 115
[lcid:3559] Prep Test 115 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
A park's user fees
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Illustration Questions / Principle Questions
Answer choices
-
ATo increase its market Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. There's no equivalent to the increase in fees here. The closest that we get is the improved service, but that results in more users, not fewer. -
BA grocery store's overall Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. There's no equivalent to a decrease in the number of users here. -
CRoad taxes are raised Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. To be equivalent, this answer would need to discuss raising road taxes, and then maintenance on the roads. However, it shifts from a fee on roads to maintenance of the mass transit system, so it's not illustrating the same principle. -
DBy spending more on Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. In this case, there are increases that come from more spending, not decreases based on higher fees. -
ELibrary fees have been Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Illustration (Principle)
Stimulus Summary:
Park user fees maintain the park. More users = more wear.
Conclusion - If fees go up, visitors go down, so even if fewer people visit, maintenance is improved.
Answer Anticipation:
There are multiple types of Illustration (Principle) questions, so we need to know which type this is. Here, we're given a situation. From it, we need to determine the principle that underlies the argument. And then we need to find an answer that brings up a similar situation conforming to the same principle.
The stimulus here is all about an interesting relationship between park wear/maintenance costs, user fees, and the number of users who go to the park. The more users, the more they pay in fees. The more users, the more wear, and thus the higher maintenance costs. So more users both provide more money for park maintenance, but more of a need for maintenance.
Raising fees will increase the money per user, but it could decrease the number of users. However, if the number of users go down, then there's less maintenance needed. The argument concludes that this balance comes out in favor of the park being better maintained—that an increase in fees will lower users, possibly to the point where there's less money for maintenance, but the lowered need for maintenance would outweigh it.
The principle is hard to put into terms, but if we understand the relationship between these three elements (fees, users, maintenance), then we should be able to find the correct answer.
Answer Explanation:
This answer matches up with all the elements in the stimulus. A fee is raised for maintenance of books, and this decreases the number of users and thus the need for book maintenance, allowing for better book maintenance despite decreased money for it. That's the same situation as the raised park fees leading to less need for maintenance and thus better maintenance despite less money for it.
Key Takeaway:
Illustration (Principle) questions can have a lot of moving parts to them. When you're confronted with one that you're having trouble translating into a principle, focus instead on the relationship between key elements. If you can define that, you can find the correct answer.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Answer makes no sense 4 replies
Started by djayasinghe
-
Answer choice E? 2 replies
Started by AnkitM
-
explanation 1 reply
Started by ariella