PrepTest 109

[lcid:3533] Prep Test 109 LSAT — Reading Comp — S2 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 8-14  .        The autobiographical narrative Incidents in the Life  . of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself , Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Author on Jacobs's autobiography (uses domestic novel conventions to create sympathy for enslaved people)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • Harriet A. Jacobs's autobiographical narrative Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself used the conventions of the sentimental domestic novel to cause free women to sympathize with enslaved people (second through last sentences)
    • Comparison, according to the author:
      • Jacobs's autobiography uses the same conventions of the sentimental domestic novel (third sentence)
    • Examples of values embodied in the sentimental domestic novel and Jacobs's autobiography, according to the author:
      • The desirability of marriage and the sanctity of personal identity, home, and family (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "provides" (first sentence), "demonstrates to her readers" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • A criticism of Jacobs's autobiography (shortchanges her unique experience) and the author's rebuttal (can't easily apply genre's values to an enslaved person's narrative)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Some critics' views:
      • Using the conventions of the domestic novel undermines Jacobs' story of enslavement (first sentence)
    • Example of criticism:
      • Domestic novel conventions overshadow the slave narrative (first sentence)
    • Author's view:
      • Jacobs uses this tension between the domestic novel and an enslaved person's narrative to show how the domestic novel's values are not achieved enslaved people (second sentence)
    • Comparisons, according to the author:
      • Unlike the typical domestic novel, Jacobs sends her lover away to protect him (third sentence)
      • Unlike the typical domestic novel, Jacobs must sacrifice a stable home and some family members to achieve her freedom (fourth sentence)
      • The "hierarchy or values" promoted by the domestic novel — where family and domesticity are prioritized — do not necessarily apply to enslaved people, who have to sacrifice those to attain their freedom (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "more complex" (second sentence), "creates a tension" (second sentence), "calling into question" (second sentence), "thus becomes an antidomestic novel" (last sentence), "demonstrates" (last sentence), "cannot be fully understood without shedding" (last sentence)

Main Point: Despite claims to the contrary, Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight.

Meta-Structure?

Rebutting Critics: This passage utilizes a Rebutting Critics Meta-Structure.* In such a passage, the author presents one or more criticisms of the subject matter before mounting a defense against those critiques.

And that's what the author does here. After introducing Harriet A. Jacobs's autobiography, the author offers their argument about that narrative: it used the conventions of the domestic novel to force her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic to her plight as an enslaved woman. The author then gives voice to critics who argue that the book's use of these conventions undermines its effectiveness as a slave narrative. The author completely disagrees with these critics, saying that Jacobs' narrative is instead enriched and empowered by the tension between these two genres. The passage concludes by describing how the book uses the expectations and values of domestic novels to force its readers to reexamine the genre's values from a broader cultural perspective.

In a passage that uses a Rebutting Critics Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's central defense. The author summarizes this defense in the last sentence, so we could use that to anticipate the main point. We also formed our own summary: "Despite claims to the contrary, Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight.

*As is often the case with a passage from the Critical Meta-Structure family, several Meta-Structures from that family could work for this passage. You could certainly call this a Correcting the Record passage or a Criticizing a Viewpoint passage and still come up with a workable understanding of the passage's structure and main point. You could even think of this as an Innovative [Subject] passage, as the author discusses Jacobs's innovations within a literary genre.

Comparison: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the comparison. The author compares and contrasts Jacobs's autobiography to a typical domestic novel throughout the passage. The two books espouse the same values. But given Jacobs's experiences as an enslaved woman, her narrative plays out in a very different way as the narratives in a typical domestic novel. Having these comparisons highlighted will make answering the inevitable questions on these similarities and differences much easier.

Last Thoughts?

The author doesn't make understanding their point very easy in this passage, which is typical English major stuff if you ask us. So, Jacobs's autobiography leads "her free readers to perceive [the domestic novel's] values within a broader social context" (P1, S5), forcing the readers to question "the applicability of the hierarchy of values espoused by the domestic novel to those who are in her situation" (P2, S2), and shows that such values "cannot be fully understood without shedding conventional perspectives (P2, S6). If you didn't quite follow that, use the author's premises and your common sense. Fortunately, the author makes the premises easy to follow. Unlike the typical domestic novel, where the protagonist finds love and family, Jacobs must sacrifice those to attain her freedom (P2, S3-S5). Her narrative suggests these values — love and family — are important to Jacobs, but her experience as an enslaved woman forces her to sacrifice those. What point is the author trying to make about that? How might Jacobs's narrative force readers to examine these values in a "broader social context" or question "the hierarchy of these values"? Why might that help free readers sympathize more with an enslaved woman? On a real test, when you don't have an explanation to rely on, you need to ask yourself these questions to figure out passages with difficult language!

Question prompt

With which one of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the main point, and use notes or highlighted/underlined text in the passage to recall the author’s attitude, and find the answer that best reflects your understanding of the main point/author’s attitude

Answer Anticipation

This question asks us about the author's view but doesn't provide any insight into the topic of the correct answer or where the supporting information might show up in the passage. This means the correct answer is likely to relate back to the author's main point. As such, we'll need to rely on our big-picture understanding of the passage to answer this question. We should start by reminding ourselves of the main point: "Despite claims to the contrary, Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight."We can also review any notes about the author's attitude or any text we highlighted because it expresses the author's opinion. After doing that, we can head to the answer choices, tabling those that don't line up with the main point. For those answer choices that conform to the author’s main point, we'll use our notes and the passage to see if it's correct.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Some authors of slave Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Is this answer choice consistent with the author's main point or what we reviewed of the author's opinions?

    No. The author's main point only discusses Jacobs's "slave narrative," so it’s hard to say what they might say about other writers in that genre. Therefore, we can eliminate (A) without reviewing the passage.

    Besides, if we did review the passage, we wouldn't find any support for this claim. (A) is out.

  2. B
    The slave narrative, no Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Is this answer choice consistent with the author's main point or what we reviewed of the author's opinions?

    This doesn't contradict the author's main point. That suggests this answer choice might be correct. If you don't recall where the author supported this claim, you may want to table this answer choice and see if you can eliminate the remaining.

    If you did review the passage to confirm that (B) is correct, you'll see that some of Jacobs’ critics claim that her use of domestic novel conventions prevents it from functioning as a true slave narrative (P2, S1). The author rebuts this claim by saying, "the relationship between the two genres is more complex" (P2, S2). By "two genres,” the author clearly refers to the domestic novels and the slave narratives. Thus, we know that the author thinks the latter is a genre, and (B) is our answer!

  3. C
    Authors who write in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Is this answer choice consistent with the author's main point or what we reviewed of the author's opinions?

    No. The author's main point is that "Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight." This suggests that the domestic novel isn't normally concerned with the plight of an enslaved woman. Further, our note for the second paragraph says that the domestic novels' values are not easily applied to an enslaved person's narrative. This suggests that an enslaved person's narrative usually isn't concerned with the values espoused by a domestic novel. Clearly, the author doesn't think Jacobs's book follows the literary conventions of the domestic novel or a narrative of an enslaved person, yet appreciates Jacobs's book anyway. That's enough to eliminate (C) without reviewing the passage.

    Besides, if we did review the passage, we'd see that the author argues that Jacobs's book succeeds because it is an "antidomestic novel," deviating from the usual "hierarchy of values" in that literary genre (P2, S6). So, the author would definitely disagree with (C).

  4. D
    An autobiography, no less Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Is this answer choice consistent with the author's main point or what we reviewed of the author's opinions?

    This doesn't contradict the author's main point. But this answer choice uses bold, SCOTUS-y language that makes a strong prescription ("should"). This language is hard to support and thus unlikely to appear in the correct answer to an Author Agree question.

    For this reason, we can table (D) and check the remaining answer choices.

    If we had to review the passage to eliminate (D), we wouldn't find any support for this claim. Even if the author thinks that Jacobs's autobiography is powerful, that’s not enough to support this answer choice. Maybe the author also thinks it’s OK for an autobiography to just be fun or amusing!

  5. E
    Autobiographies should be evaluated Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Is this answer choice consistent with the author's main point or what we reviewed of the author's opinions?

    This doesn't contradict the author's main point. But this answer choice uses bold, SCOTUS-y language that makes a strong prescription ("should"). This language is hard to support and thus unlikely to appear in the correct answer to an Author Agree question. For this reason, we can table (E) and check the remaining answer choices.

    If we had to review the passage to eliminate (E), we wouldn't find any support for this claim. We have no idea whether the author appreciates "historical accuracy" in an autobiography — the author never brings up that topic.

What this tests

Discussion