PrepTest 156
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic:
Science/Social Science
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Problem/Solution and Old Approach/New Approach
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Problem: North American agri practices are eroding the genetic base of crops, making them less durable (pests/disease)
- Solution/New Approach: Look into indigenous farmers (practices, heirloom varieties of crops)
- Old Approach: Focus on agricultural methods brought to North America from elsewhere
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Study/Examples of better practices by indigenous farmers
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Study: Indigenous farmers used genetics to make varieties
- Example: Hybridization — Lots of varieties of (list of crops) that resisted disease/pests
- Example: Make crops for local environments, less dependent on irrigation
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Process of maintenance; new wrinkle on problem
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Process: Regional exchange networks for seeds; oral tradition for methods
- Problem: World market economy leading to these practices and varieties being lost, so need to protect ASAP
Main Point:
Because mass farming practices have harmed crop durability, it's important to turn to indigenous farmers' practices to protect the genetic base of crops, especially as the world market is starting to cause these practices to be lost.
Key Lines (P(aragraph)#, S(entence)#)?
P1, S1 - The problem
P1, S2 - One solution
P1, S3 - The Old and New Approaches
P2, S2 - An example is introduced
P2, S4 - Another example
P3, S1 - Processes by which the solution has worked
P3, S2 - A new wrinkle to the problem
Meta-Structure?
Problem/Solution: The opening sentence here introduces what is clearly a problem: the increasing susceptibility of food crops to pests and disease due to current agricultural processes. From this, we should expect the author to bring up a solution, or a variety of solutions. The author does so explicitly in the second sentence — looking to the "store of agricultural knowledge" held by indigenous farmers and the heirloom crops they work with. While the author calls this only a "possible" solution, the rest of the passage describes why this knowledge and these crop varieties can solve the problem, which suggests the author has at least some faith in the solution. In a Problem/Solution passage where the author supports a particular solution, the solution is the main point, reflected in our summary above.
Old Approach/New Approach: In Paragraph 1, Sentence 3, the author brings up Old and New Approaches used by crop geneticists to preserve the genetic base of crops. The Old Approach focused on studying "solely" agricultural methods brought to North America from elsewhere. These approaches aren't mentioned again. The New Approach is to study the methods and varieties of crops produced by indigenous farmers, which is the solution/main point. So this Meta-Structure informs the main point, but it isn't the central Meta-Structure that defines the passage. Expect a question or two on this Meta-Structure, but we shouldn't eliminate main point answer choices simply because they don't reference the old approach.
Last Thoughts?
This is a fairly straightforward passage as far as information, structure, and Meta-Structures are concerned, so let's head to the questions!
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AThey have been too Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Question Type:
Author's Attitude/Must Be TrueStrategy Overview:
Review the second-to-last sentence of Paragraph 1 (and any related sentences), using that and the overall argument made by the author in the passage to determine the author's overall opinion of the crop geneticists; then, use that to find the correct answerAnswer Anticipation/Relevant Lines:
Since this question points us to P1, S3, we should start there. Looking at that sentence, we can see the author brings up these crop geneticists as a group that has "only recently" recognized the value of heirloom crop varieties. Since we know the author believes these are valuable, this suggests the author believes that the crop geneticists could have recognized the value of heirloom crops earlier. This would suggest the author has at least a slightly negative opinion of them. Later, the author discusses how the crop geneticists focused their thinking "solely" on a certain type of agricultural method. This should solidify our impression that the author doesn't have the best opinion of this group.The following sentence includes a pivot word ("But"), so the thought there is connected in some way to this sentence. Looking there, we can see that the crop geneticists' preferred methods are further described as ones meant to "maximize the land's output for economic reasons."
So, overall, the author believes that the crop geneticists preferred for too long on the wrong agricultural methods because they were too focused on maximizing output to make money. Let's find an answer stating something similar to that.
Answer Choice Explanation:
(P1, S3-4) The author says that these crop geneticists "only recently" focused on the value of heirloom crops, because before the geneticists "solely" focused on agricultural methods that sought "to maximize the land's output for economic reasons." This answer choice reflects those details, and it captures the author's negative opinion of how long it took them to switch their focus ("too willing"), so it's the correct answer.Key Takeaway:
While we can make small inferences in these questions asking about the author's opinion on a subject, we should select an answer that's as close to the text as possible and not make arguments for the author. -
BThey are focused on Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(P1, S3-4) There's no mention of small farmers in the section discussing the crop geneticists. Additionally, there's no sign that their work came "at the expense" of small farmers, who it appears were doing their own thing and weren't much impacted by the work of this group! -
CThey have not demonstrated Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
(P1, S3) The author notes that the crop geneticists have started to focus on the heirloom varieties, even if only recently. So the author would believe that the geneticists are interested in diversifying the crop genetic pool, even if they're turning to a specific solution later than they probably should have. -
DThey are interested in Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(P1, S4) The author disconnects these two goals — maximizing output, maintaining a diverse pool of crop genetics — in the final sentence of Paragraph 1. And the central problem explored in the passage is the erosion of the crop genetic base, not the failure to make money. One could argue that maintaining the genetic base of crops and thus preserving their ability to resist pests and disease is connected to the yields and thus output of crops. But the author doesn't make that argument. -
EThey continue to ignore Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(P1, S3) The author notes that they have "recently" (even if "only" recently) shown an interest in heirloom crop varieties, so this answer is contradicted by the passage.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Question # 7 1 reply
Started by JosephRocco