Why not C and why A?

P argues that because we exist in the same universe with the same constant laws of physics/science and mathematics, that aliens will inevitably develop radio communication which must mean she believes the laws of the universe are interpretable and applicable to any civilization and they will manifest themselves in the same technology. A argues that "*science, mathematics,* and technology" are outgrowths of physiology, cognitive makeup and environment. If A believes that laws of science and math are not constant and discoverable throughout the universe because they're products of our own limitations and environment, then technology would be different and answer choice C would be a point at issue. Paula believes tech is the "inevitable" result of the laws of the universe colliding with any interpreter so she would disagree with C while Ashley agrees with this. My problem with A is that Ashley never implies the improbability that aliens would develop radio communication. Rather, she is arguing they are unlikely to have the same tech as us because they don't operate under the same laws of math and science. This leaves open the possibility aliens can stumble upon radio communication.