PrepTest 155

Incorrect. Leona doesn't accuse Thompson of repeating a premise as a conclusion.

Incorrect. Leona tells us Thompson's definition of a self-identified agent, so this answer is wrong.

Incorrect. Leona doesn't dive into the textual evidence or state that Thompson doesn't back up assertions, so this answer is wrong.

Incorrect. Leona doesn't assess likelihood anywhere in the argument, so this answer is wrong.

Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument

Valid or Flawed:
Flawed

Question Type:
Methods of Reasoning

Stimulus Summary:
At one point, Thompson describes a character as having anxiety. At another point, Thompson identifies that character as being incapable of anxiety. Therefore, the article is puzzling.

Answer Anticipation:
Leona brings up two statements that highlight contradictory statements by Thompson in order to reach the conclusion. It's rare to see contradictory statements on the LSAT, so you should note when it happens. The repeated phrase here is key—that generally means either a shift in meaning or a contradiction.

Answer Explanation:
Thompson claims that a character is anxious and is incapable of anxiety, which are contradictory statements. This is the correct answer.

Key Takeaway:
When you see a concept repeated, pay attention. It generally means a shift in language or a contradiction. The latter is rare, but, as we see here, it does happen!