PrepTest 155

[lcid:3718] Prep Test 155 LSAT — Reading Comp — S3 Reading comp

Passage

Passage A  In 1940, Benjamin Lee Whorf seduced a whole generation into believing that our mother tongue restricts what we Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary Topic:
Social Science

Passage A
Paragraph 1
  • Paragraph note
    • Author's criticism of Whorf's theory (language restricts thoughts)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • There's no evidence for Whorf's outrageous claim that language restricts our thoughts (second and last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "seduced" (first sentence); "impose" (second sentence); "never actually been any evidence" (last sentence); "fantastic claims" (last sentence)
Paragraph 2
  • Paragraph note
    • Author's argument (new research shows that language influences what we think about) and support (gender example)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The main issue with Whorf's theory is the belief that language prevents certain thoughts (first sentence); research suggests that language just influences what we think about
    • Example of how language influences thought, according to the author:
      • German forces you to think about whether neighbors are male or female (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "main mistake" (first sentence); "suggests that in reality"
Paragraph 3
  • Paragraph note
    • Author's additional support (genders of objects influence how we think about the objects)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • Gendered words for objects can cause us to develop different feelings about the object (first sentence)
    • Example of how gendered words influence thoughts, according to study:
      • Study on words where genders are different in German and Spanish (second through last sentence)
      • Words included bridges, clocks, violins, mountains, and chairs
    • Author's attitude: "can shape" (first sentence)


Passage B
Paragraph 1
  • Paragraph note
    • Study of Piraha and Munduruku Indian subjects (don't have number words but seem to understand numbers)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Point of intersection with passage A:
      • The idea of "number words" and an "innate imprecise nonverbal concept of number" invokes the same central question as passage A — does language change how we think?
    • Author's attitude: "give evidence" (first sentence); "appear to indicate" (last setnence)
Paragraph 2
  • Paragraph note
    • Discuss a surface-level interpretation of the study, and a deeper one
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
    • Point of intersection with passage A:
      • The author brings Whorf is brought up, suggesting that on the surface, the study shows that language is independent of concepts (passage A would disagree that language and concepts are independent) (first sentence)
    • Comparison, according to the study:
      • People with exact number words value exact values (e.g., when doing basic addition and subtraction), while those without number words are indifferent to exact values (third through the fifth sentence)
    • List of potential conclusions from the study, according to the author:
      • Strong Whorfian, weak Whorfian, or non-Whorfian (last sentence()
    • Point of intersection with passage A:
      • The author also says the study's findings on exact numerical values could support the idea that language expands how we think about concepts (which the author of passage A discusses re: gender of bridges, etc.) or directs attention to certain concepts (which the author of passage A discusses re: gender of neighbors) (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "support" (first sentence); "there is more to the story" (second sentence); "suggest" (last sentence")


Main Points?
Passage A: Contrary to Whorf's hypothesis that language prevents us from having certain thoughts, language influences how we think about things.
Passage B: A study of innumerate peoples shows could support a variety of conclusions — from strong Whorfian to non-Whorfoian — about the relationship between language and thought.

Meta-Structure? Overall Relationship?
Relationship - Similar Viewpoints: Both passages discuss the connection between language and thought. The authors are at least somewhat aligned in their views. Both would agree that Whorf's theory isn't the end of the story when it comes to the relationship between language and thought. The author of passage A criticizes Whorf's theory for assuming that language prevents us from forming certain thoughts. And the author of passage B says that we can draw at least two non-Whorfian conclusions from a study.

Relationship - Different Scopes: The topic of passage A is also quite a bit broader in scope than the topic of passage B. Passage A addresses the relationship between language and thought in general. On the other hand, passage B discusses the conclusions about language and thought that can be drawn from one specific study. The type of language the passages describe is quite different as well. Passage A focuses on grammatically gendered words, while passage B hones in on numerical words. Because the scope and topics of these passages are slightly different, expect very few questions to ask us to compare the passages' details or the authors' views. Instead, most questions will likely ask about the general relationship between the two passages, or they'll ask about just one of the two passages. 

Last Thoughts?
Passage A is very strong in its negative opinion of Whorf's hypothesis, using language such as "seduced," "never actually been any evidence," and "main mistake." Nonetheless, the author believes there is a connection between language and thought — just not the one that Whorf put forward (forced thought vs. prevented thought).

Passage B brings up the hypothesis, but just to have a term to characterize conclusions that can be drawn from the study. At the end of the day, passage B believes that a "non-Whorfian hypothesis" is just as possible as a Whorfian one when describing the study's results.

These viewpoints are much more nuanced than just "Whorf good/bad," and so we should be wary of answers that are blunt in that respect.

Question prompt

Given the style and Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Answer choices

  1. A
    The author of passage Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem
    Question Type:
    Tone/Author's Audience

    Strategy Overview:
    Review the introductory paragraph and the words that express both authors' attitudes to determine whether each author is writing for a general or specific audience

    Answer Anticipation:
    The Author's Audience question is a rare Tone question that appears most frequently in comparative passages. These questions are classified under the Tone family of questions because we'll mostly rely on the authors' word choice to determine whether they are writing for a general audience (like the kind that would read a popular magazine or website) or a specific audience (like an audience of specialists or academics). Authors who write for a general population will tend to use more words that convey excitement or criticism, while the opinions of authors writing for a specialized audience will usually be more muted. Additionally, the introductory paragraphs of both passages can be revealing. Authors writing for a general audience will make the opening paragraph accessible. They'll clearly define the subject matter and any relevant concepts. They'll also try to build intrigue by asking tantalizing questions or making bold assertions. On the other hand, authors writing for specialized or academic audiences will assume that their readers are already familiar with and interested in the topic. Such authors won't define their terms or build suspense.

    In this case, passage A's tone is much more opinionated — notice the words like "seduced" (PA, P1, S1), "fantastical" (PA, P1, S3), and "mistake" (PA, P2, S1). Passage A also defines Whorf's hypothesis and builds intrigue by intimating that Whorf seduced a generation with a fantastically wrong hypothesis (PA, P1, S3). On the other hand, passage B's author is more detached and academic, using big words and including an exploration of the studies' results that were much more difficult to understand. Also, notice how the author of passage B assumes we already know what a "Whorfian" and "non-Whorfian" hypothesis is. For these reasons, we can infer that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized audience (probably an academic audience, given the expectation that we already know who Whorf is). Let's look for that in the answer choices.

    Answer Choice Explanation:
    Does this says that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized or academic audience?

    Absolutely! This was our prediction after reviewing the author's tone and introductory paragraphs, so we can confidently select this answer choice. Indeed, passage A is much more opinionated and relies on more accessible language and straightforward examples. Passage B is more detached, without a clear opinion, and concludes that multiple possible interpretations are correct. It uses "harder" vocab and expects us to already be familiar with Whorfian hypotheses. This suggests that passage A is written for a more general audience than passage B, and passage B is aimed at academics, so this is the correct answer.

    Key Takeaway:
    Similar to the previous question, take these answers one half at a time. If any of the details don't line up, you can eliminate it.
  2. B
    The author of passage Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Does this says that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized or academic audience?

    Nope. We can cross (B) off. Besides, both passages discuss specific groups of people and the languages they use, so either could be an anthropologist or a linguist.
  3. C
    The author of passage Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Does this says that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized or academic audience?

    Not at all. In fact, this answer choice reverses the passages. Passage A uses stronger language — especially with respect to Whorf — and puts forward a specific theory about language and thought. Passage B uses more academic language and concludes that there are four more or less equally valid interpretations of the data. The author of passage B is more of a neutral observer, and the author of passage A is more of an advocate for a particular view.
  4. D
    The author of passage Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Does this says that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized or academic audience?

    Not quite. Passage A discusses Whorf's hypothesis not to explore the history of the idea but to form an alternative hypothesis. And the author of passage A is also concerned with the truth of Whorf's hypothesis.
  5. E
    The author of passage Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Does this says that the author of passage A addresses a general audience, while the author of passage B addresses a specialized or academic audience?

    No, so experienced test-takers would cross this off. But this is still a tempting answer choice! Passage A is dismissive of Whorf's ideas, while passage B states that interpretations of a study can conform to a Whorfian hypothesis. However, Whorf's hypothesis isn't the only idea under discussion. Even in passage A, the focus is broader — on how language influences thought. And the author of passage A isn't dismissive of that idea — it's the author's main point. As such, this answer is incorrect.

What this tests

Discussion