PrepTest 104

[lcid:3513] Prep Test 104 LSAT — Reading Comp — S2 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 7-14  .        By the mid–fourteenth century, professional  . associations of canon lawyers (legal advocates in  . Christian ecclesiastical Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph Note
    • Phenomenon introduced (professional canon lawyers guilds, unlike other guilds, rarely disciplined members)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Definitions
      • Professional associations of canon lawyers: legal advocates in Christian ecclesiastical courts (first sentence)
      • Christian ecclesiastical courts: courts that dealt with cases involving marriage, inheritance, etc. (first sentence)
    • Comparison
      • Professional associations of canon lawyers did not play a prominent role in enforcing standards of conduct, unlike other guilds at the time and modern professional associations do (second sentences)
    • Example of a professional association of lawyers hobbling conduct enforcement efforts, according to the author:
      • Florentine guild forbade its members to play any role in the discipline of another member (fifth sentence)
      • Few recorded examples of disciplinary enforcement are initiated by clients and not fellow lawyers (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "might expect" (second sentence); "often did" (second sentence); "seems not to have happened" (second sentence); "little fervor" (third sentence); "erring" (third sentence); "some even" (fourth sentence); "few" (last sentence); "apparently" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph Note
    • Two possible explanations for phenomenon (1. canon lawyers were more ethical, or 2. discipline was less efficient)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of two explanations for why canon guilds, rarely disciplined members
      • They all followed the rules, or they didn't but the enforcement mechanisms were so bad no one was caught/punished (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "[a]t first glance" (first sentence); "seem" (first sentence); "possible" (first sentence); "may have" (second sentence); "possible" (last sentence three)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph Note
    • Author on why explanation 2 is more likely (1: civil courts, with similar rules and members, disciplined more frequently)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Comparisons, according to the author:
      • The econd explanation is more plausible than the first (first sentence)
      • Unlikely that church lawyers were more ethical than civil court lawyers (last sentence)
    • List of reasons why the second explanation is more likely, according to the author:
      • First reason: Non-church legal courts show plenty of examples of disciplinary proceedings, and these courts had similar rules and members as the church courts (second through last sentences)
    • Author attitude: "makes it clear" (first sentence); "more plausible" (first sentence); "many more" (second sentence); "could well indicate" (third sentence); "seems inherently weak" (last sentence); "especially" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph Note
    • Author on why explanation 2 is more likely (2: church records reveal many complaints about ethics violations)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of reasons why the second explanation is more likely, according to the author (continued from previous paragraph):
      • Second reason: Church authorities complained about ethical failures and lack of disciplinary measures (first sentence)
    • Examples of complaints, according to the author:
      • Council of Basel declared the canon lawyers were lacking ethics and directed Cardinal Cesarini to address the problem (second sentence)
      • In England, there were many complaints about the lack of a functioning discipline system (last sentence)
    • Author attitude: "deplored the shortcomings" (first sentence); "extraordinarily rich" (last sentence)

Paragraph 5

  • Paragraph Note
    • Implications of explanation (caused lawyers to defend themselves rather than discipline members)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the author:
      • Criticism about ethics in the profession caused solidarity among lawyers, which caused them to start a professional association to defend themselves rather than improve ethics (first through last sentence)
    • Author attitude: "paradoxical result" (first sentence); "apparently" (first sentence); "may actually have" (second sentence); "may also have" (last sentence)

Main Point:

Although professional associations of canon lawyers ostensibly were created to uphold professional standards since the mid-fourteenth century, there weren't many disciplinary proceedings against members because these associations may have focused more on defending members from critics than enforcing ethical standards.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1, S2) - Phenomenon introduced

P2, S1 - Two possible explanations introduced

P3, S1 - The author chooses the second explanation

P3, S2 - First reason why

P4, S1 - Second reason why

P5, S2 - Conclusion regarding the real purpose of the association

Meta-Structure?

Phenomenon/Explanation: This passage utilizes a Phenomenon/Explanation Major Meta-Structure. In the first paragraph, the author introduces the central phenemonon: although other medieval guilds played a prominent role in enforcing their own professional standards, professional associations of canon lawyers did not seem to do this much at all. The author then gives two possible explanations to the rarity of disciplinary proceedings: either all these canon lawyers followed the rules, or they didn't but the enforcement mechanisms were so bad no one was caught or punished. The author then explains why the latter is the more likely reason, using comparison and example minor Meta-Structures to support their explanation.

The main point is generally the author's explanation in a Phenomenon/Explanation passage. The author more or less summarizes their explanation in the last sentence of the passage. But we decided to flesh out the explanation a bit more. So, we summarized the author's explanation as: "Although professional associations of canon lawyers ostensibly were created to uphold professional standards since the mid-fourteenth century, there weren't many disciplinary proceedings against members because these associations may have focused more on defending members from critics than enforcing ethical standards."

Last Thoughts?

This author hits for the minor Meta-Structure cycle — there are comparisons, examples, cause and effect, and lists galore. Given the sheer number of important details in this passage, we expext a higher-than-usual percentage of Minor Point, Author Agree, and Application questions.

Question prompt

The author refers to Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Review the Council of Basel reference in passage, consult notes, and choose an answer choice based on your understanding of that reference in the passage's overall argument

Answer Anticipation

Wow, another Argument Structure/Role of Detail so soon after the last. This one asks us why the author inserted the discussion of Council of Basel into the fourth paragraph. The drill should be familiar then. Unless a detail conflicts with the paragraph's purpose, the author probably mentioned that detail to advance the paragraph's role. So reviewing the fourth paragraph's role, which we hopefully wrote down in the notes on our scratch paper, will generally reveal why the author included that detail.In this case, our note for the fourth paragraph is, "Author on why explanation 2 is more likely (2: church records reveal many complaints about ethics violations)." So, the fourth paragraph apparently has two purposes: first, to show that church records reveal that ethical violations by canon lawyers were common, and second, more generally, to support the author's contention that disciplinary procedures were uncommon because the canon guild's system was inefficient.Does the reference to the Council of Basel serve either of those purposes? Let's review the fourth paragraph. This example doesn't deal with court records specifically but instead shows that ethical violations were so common that the Council was forced to take notice and ask a Cardinal to do something about it (P4, S2). So, this example shows that ethical violations in canon lawyer guilds were common, which indirectly supports the contention that the guilds' enforcement mechanisms were inefficient (by undermining the alternative explanation that such ethical violations were rare). Let's look for an answer choice that brings up one of these points.

Answer choices

  1. A
    provide an example of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice say that the example shows that ethical violations in canon lawyer guilds were common or indirectly supports the contention that the guilds' enforcement mechanisms were inefficient?

    Nope. The example has nothing to do with the type of action needed to *create* professional standards. After all, those standards already existed, and this example shows that the standards were not being adhered to or enforced.

  2. B
    contrast the reactions of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice say that the example shows that ethical violations in canon lawyer guilds were common or indirectly supports the contention that the guilds' enforcement mechanisms were inefficient?

    Nope. It doesn't match our anticipation, so we can eliminate it without dwelling on it.

    Although this sentence is immediately followed by a sentence about churches in England, these two institutions are not contrasted in any way. The author uses both examples to show that ethical violations in canon lawyer guilds were common and that the guilds' enforcement mechanisms were inefficient.

  3. C
    bolster the argument that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem

    (C) Does this answer choice say that the example shows that ethical violations in canon lawyer guilds were common or indirectly supports the contention that the guilds' enforcement mechanisms were inefficient?

    This is it. This answer choice reflects the first part of our anticipation. So, we can confidently choose this one and move on.

  4. D
    explain how rules of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this match any of our anticipations for the role of this detail?

    Nope. Like answer choice (A), the Council of Basel example does not show how standards were *established* but instead illustrates how the standards were not enforced.

  5. E
    describe the development of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this match any of our anticipations for the role of this detail?

    No, but this is nonetheless a popular answer choice. So, let's make sure we understand why it is wrong. Although the author says that the Council of Basel demanded that the Cardinal address canon lawyers' disciplinary violations, the author does say whether anyone actually began enforcing these standards! Moreover, neither the fourth paragraph generally nor the Council of Basel example specifically explained how the guilds started to enforce their ethical standards. Quite the opposite — the author wanted to show that ethical violations were common but rarely disciplined!

What this tests

Discussion

  • Help 2 replies

    Started by JayDee8732