Why not C?
Started by
MichelleRod
· started 2017-09-09 19:36
· last activity 2017-09-14 00:33
· 1 reply
Saying the inspector went to "various" manufacturing locations indicates that he or she didn't go to all of them, so why doesn't C work? How can we discount the possibility that the locations not visited have a much lower defect rate, effectively bringing the average below the contractually required 5%?
-
Mehran
· 2017-09-14 00:33
Hi @MichelleRod, thanks for your post.
It doesn't matter whether the defects are clustered in just a few sites, or instead spread more evenly across a larger number of sites. The "supplier is contractually required to limit to rate of defects among items it manufactures"--on the aggregate--to below 5%.
Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any additional questions.
Sign in to reply.